World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fernando Mayer Pelicice

Fernando Mayer Pelicice

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
45
Citations
10893
World Ranking
4759
National Ranking
83

Fernando Mayer Pelicice publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Mayer Pelicice sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Fernando Mayer Pelicice D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Mayer Pelicice sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fernando Mayer Pelicice is affiliated with the Federal University of Tocantins in Brazil. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

Their scientific work covers multiple topics, notably:

  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Fernando Mayer Pelicice has published in various academic journals, frequently contributing to:

  • Neotropical Ichthyology
  • Hydrobiologia
  • Environmental Management
  • Biota Neotropica
  • Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Pelicice include:

  • "Large-scale Degradation of the Tocantins-Araguaia River Basin" (2021) published in Environmental Management
  • "Ecosystem services generated by Neotropical freshwater fishes" (2022) published in Hydrobiologia
  • "A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation" (2021) published in Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

In addition, Pelicice has collaborated in works such as:

  • "Plastic pollution: A focus on freshwater biodiversity" (2021) published in AMBIO
  • "Negative impacts of mining on Neotropical freshwater fishes" (2021) published in Neotropical Ichthyology

Frequent co-authors of Pelicice include:

  • Valter M. Azevedo-Santos
  • Ângelo Antônio Agostinho
  • Dilermando P. Lima-Junior
  • André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães
  • Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule

Best Publications

  • Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong

    K. O Winemiller;P. B McIntyre;L Castello;E Fluet-Chouinard

  • Ecologia e manejo de recursos pesqueiros em reservatorios do Brasil

    A.A. Agostinho;L.C. Gomes;F.M. Pelicice

  • Dams and the fish fauna of the Neotropical region: impacts and management related to diversity and fisheries.

    Agostinho Aa;Pelicice Fm;Gomes Lc

  • Fish‐Passage Facilities as Ecological Traps in Large Neotropical Rivers

    Fernando Mayer Pelicice;Angelo Antonio Agostinho

  • Large reservoirs as ecological barriers to downstream movements of Neotropical migratory fish

    Fernando M Pelicice;Paulo S Pompeu;Angelo A Agostinho

  • Fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: Colonization patterns, impacts and management

    Angelo Antonio Agostinho;Luiz Carlos Gomes;Natália C.L. Santos;Jean Carlo Goncalves Ortega

  • EXISTING AND FUTURE CHALLENGES: THE CONCEPT OF SUCCESSFUL FISH PASSAGE IN SOUTH AMERICA

    P. S. Pompeu;A. A. Agostinho;F. M. Pelicice

  • Effects of River Impoundment on Ecosystem Services of Large Tropical Rivers: Embodied Energy and Market Value of Artisanal Fisheries

    David J. Hoeinghaus;Angelo A. Agostinho;Luiz C. Gomes;Fernando M. Pelicice

  • Blockage of migration routes by dam construction: can migratory fish find alternative routes?

    Rosimeire Ribeiro Antonio;Angelo Antonio Agostinho;Fernando Mayer Pelicice;Dayani Bailly

  • Fish fauna destruction after the introduction of a non-native predator ( Cichla kelberi ) in a Neotropical reservoir

    Fernando Mayer Pelicice;Angelo Antonio Agostinho

  • Fish diversity in the upper Paraná River basin: habitats, fisheries, management and conservation

    A. A. Agostinho;F. M. Pelicice;A. C. Petry;L. C. Gomes

  • Neotropical freshwater fishes imperilled by unsustainable policies

    Fernando M Pelicice;Valter M Azevedo‐Santos;Jean R S Vitule;Mário L Orsi

  • A Serious New Threat to Brazilian Freshwater Ecosystems: The Naturalization of Nonnative Fish by Decree

    Fernando Mayer Pelicice;Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule;Dilermando Pereira Lima Junior;Mário Luis Orsi

  • Fish assemblages associated with Egeria in a tropical reservoir: investigating the effects of plant biomass and diel period

    Fernando Mayer Pelicice;Angelo Antonio Agostinho;Sidinei Magela Thomaz

  • Feeding ecology of fishes associated with Egeria spp. patches in a tropical reservoir, Brazil

    F. M. Pelicice;A. A. Agostinho

  • Plastic pollution: A focus on freshwater biodiversity

    Valter M. Azevedo-Santos;Marcelo F. G. Brito;Pedro S. Manoel;Júlia F. Perroca;Júlia F. Perroca

  • Protected areas: A focus on Brazilian freshwater biodiversity

    Valter M. Azevedo-Santos;Renata G. Frederico;Camila K. Fagundes;Paulo S. Pompeu

  • Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil

    Valter M. Azevedo-Santos;Philip M. Fearnside;Caroline S. Oliveira;André A. Padial

  • Selectivity of fish ladders: a bottleneck in Neotropical fish movement

    Carlos Sérgio Agostinho;Angelo Antônio Agostinho;Fernando Pelicice;Deusimar Augusto de Almeida

  • Plastic ingestion by fish: A global assessment.

    Valter M. Azevedo-Santos;Geslaine R.L. Gonçalves;Pedro S. Manoel;Marcelo C. Andrade

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelo Antonio Agostinho
Angelo Antonio Agostinho State University of Maringa
Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule
Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule Federal University of Paraná
Luiz Carlos Gomes
Luiz Carlos Gomes State University of Maringa
Paulo Santos Pompeu
Paulo Santos Pompeu Federal University of Lavras
Miguel Petrere
Miguel Petrere Federal University of São Carlos
André Andrian Padial
André Andrian Padial Federal University of Paraná
Sidinei Magela Thomaz
Sidinei Magela Thomaz State University of Maringa
Daniel Simberloff
Daniel Simberloff University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Philip M. Fearnside
Philip M. Fearnside National Institute of Amazonian Research
Emili García-Berthou
Emili García-Berthou University of Girona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse fields that prioritize environmental awareness, research skills, and data literacy. For students seeking flexible options, online degrees in related disciplines can be both affordable and career-enhancing.

Many students interested in research or academic careers may benefit from looking into the cheapest online masters in history, where analytical writing and historical context overlap with ecological studies. Similarly, those passionate about managing information resources can explore an affordable library science degree online to gain essential skills in data curation and scientific communication.

Candidates considering roles in science communication or clinical settings may wish to review graduate options like asha approved slp programs online. These accredited programs ensure you meet professional standards in communication science. For students without a related undergraduate background, speech pathology bridge programs can provide valuable entry pathways into the field.

Exploring related online degrees helps students gain interdisciplinary knowledge and develop career flexibility for the evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Fernando Mayer Pelicice

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles