World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claudia Costa Bonecker

Claudia Costa Bonecker

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4625
World Ranking
7169
National Ranking
132

Claudia Costa Bonecker publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Costa Bonecker sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 193 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Claudia Costa Bonecker D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Costa Bonecker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudia Costa Bonecker is affiliated with the State University of Maringa in Brazil and has a research focus in Environmental Science, with a particular concentration on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, Oceanography, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research topics cover a range of aquatic and ecological studies, including:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Recent publications by Claudia Costa Bonecker include:

  • Scale-dependent patterns of metacommunity structuring in aquatic organisms across floodplain systems, 2020, Journal of Biogeography
  • Multitrophic richness enhances ecosystem multifunctionality of tropical shallow lakes, 2021, Functional Ecology
  • Zooplankton taxonomic and functional structure is determined by macrophytes and fish predation in a Neotropical river, 2021, Hydrobiologia
  • Environmental filter drives the taxonomic and functional β-diversity of zooplankton in tropical shallow lakes, 2021, Hydrobiologia
  • Non-native fishes homogenize native fish communities and reduce ecosystem multifunctionality in tropical lakes over 16 years, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, notably:

  • Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha
  • Luzia Cleide Rodrigues
  • Gilmar Perbiche-Neves
  • Tatiane Mantovano
  • Fernando Miranda Lansac-Tôha

Bonecker's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Hydrobiologia
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Limnologica
  • Aquatic Sciences
  • Freshwater Biology

Best Publications

  • Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure.

    André A. Padial;Fernanda Ceschin;Steven A. J. Declerck;Luc De Meester

  • Biodiversity of zooplankton communities in the Upper Paraná River floodplain: interannual variation from long-term studies

    F A Lansac-Tôha;C C Bonecker;L F M Velho;N R Simões

  • Rotifers in different environments of the Upper Paraná River floodplain (Brazil): richness, abundance and the relationship with connectivity

    Anderson S.M. Aoyagui;Claudia C. Bonecker

  • Effects of water quantity on connectivity: the case of the upper Paraná River floodplain

    Angelo Antonio Agostinho;Cláudia Costa Bonecker;Luiz Carlos Gomes

  • Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems.

    Paloma M. Lopes;Luis M. Bini;Steven A. J. Declerck;Vinicius F. Farjalla

  • Community structure of rotifers in two environments of the upper River Paraná floodplain (MS) - Brazil

    C. C. Bonecker;F. A. Lansac-Tôha

  • Floods control the influence of environmental gradients on the diversity of zooplankton communities in a neotropical floodplain

    Nadson Ressyé Simões;Juliana Déo Dias;Clarice Maria Leal;Louizi de Souza Magalhães Braghin

  • Planktonic and non-planktonic rotifers in two environments of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

    Cláudia C. Bonecker;Fábio A. Lansac-Tôha;Dayane C. Rossa

  • Impact of reservoirs on zooplankton diversity and implications for the conservation of natural aquatic environments

    Nadson R. Simões;Ariádine H. Nunes;Juliana D. Dias;Fábio A. Lansac-Tôha

  • Temporal changes in zooplankton species diversity in response to environmental changes in an alluvial valley

    Claudia Costa Bonecker;Nadson Ressyé Simões;Carolina Viviane Minte-Vera;Fabio Amodeo Lansac-Tôha

  • Effects of dams decrease zooplankton functional β‐diversity in river‐associated lakes

    Louizi de Souza Magalhães Braghin;Bia de Arruda Almeida;Diogo Castanho Amaral;Tassia Felício Canella

  • The impact of impoundment on the rotifer communities in two tropical floodplain environments: interannual pulse variations

    C. C. Bonecker;A. S. M. Aoyagui;R. M. Santos

  • Zooplankton biomass in tropical reservoirs in southern Brazil

    Claudia Costa Bonecker;Mariza Yuri Nagae;Martin Cesar Maria Bletller;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho

  • Diversity and Abundance of the Planktonic Rotifers in Different Environments of the Upper Paraná River Floodplain (Paraná State – Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil)

    Cláudia Costa Bonecker;Christiane Luciana Da Costa;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho;Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

  • Intra and inter-annual structure of zooplankton communities in floodplain lakes: a long-term ecological research study.

    Nadson R. Simões;Fábio A. Lansac-Tôha;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho;Claudia C. Bonecker

  • Effects of fish farming on plankton structure in a Brazilian tropical reservoir

    Paula A. F. Borges;Paula A. F. Borges;Sueli Train;Juliana D. Dias;Cláudia C. Bonecker

  • Hydrological dynamics drives zooplankton metacommunity structure in a Neotropical floodplain

    Juliana Déo Dias;Nadson Ressyé Simões;Mariana Meerhoff;Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

  • Qualitative study of rotifers in different environments of the high Parana river floodplain (MS) - Brazil

    Claudia Costa Bonecker;Fabio Armodeo Lansac-Toha;Andrea Staub

  • Zooplankton assemblage concordance patterns in Brazilian reservoirs

    Luis Mauricio Bini;Leo Caetano F. da Silva;Luiz Felipe M. Velho;Claudia C. Bonecker

  • Evidence against the use of surrogates for biomonitoring of Neotropical floodplains

    André A. Padial;André A. Padial;Steven A. J. Declerck;Luc De Meester;Cláudia C. Bonecker

  • The influence of heavy metals on toxicogenetic damage in a Brazilian tropical river

    Leomá A. Matos;Ana C.S. Cunha;Aline A. Sousa;Jéssica P.R. Maranhão

  • The temporal distribution pattern of copepods in Corumbá Reservoir, State of Goiás, Brazil

    C. C. Bonecker;F. A. Lansac-Tôha;L. F. M. Velho;D. C. Rossa

Frequent Co-Authors

Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha
Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha State University of Maringa
Luiz Felipe Machado Velho
Luiz Felipe Machado Velho State University of Maringa
Luis Mauricio Bini
Luis Mauricio Bini Universidade Federal de Goiás
André Andrian Padial
André Andrian Padial Federal University of Paraná
Tadeu Siqueira
Tadeu Siqueira Sao Paulo State University
Sidinei Magela Thomaz
Sidinei Magela Thomaz State University of Maringa
Maria Rosa Miracle
Maria Rosa Miracle University of Valencia
Koen Martens
Koen Martens Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
Angelo Antonio Agostinho
Angelo Antonio Agostinho State University of Maringa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution opens the door to various academic and professional opportunities, especially when choosing flexible online study options. Many programs, such as those in nursing and healthcare, have become widely accessible online, making it easier for students to balance education and personal commitments.

When considering specialized study tracks, comparing programs like the chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program can help you find the right fit for your career goals and lifestyle. Similarly, aspiring professionals seeking advanced qualifications can explore online bsn to msn programs to bridge their credentials and expand career prospects.

Accreditation and institutional reputation matter too. Opting for not for profit online colleges ensures quality education backed by recognized standards. Additionally, those with military backgrounds or commitments may value the support offered by military friendly colleges, which provide tailored resources and flexible course delivery.

Whether you aim to advance in the sciences, nursing, or related fields, these online pathways offer accessible, reputable, and supportive environments for lifelong learning and career development.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Costa Bonecker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles