World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joanne Berger-Sweeney

Joanne Berger-Sweeney

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4908
World Ranking
8837
National Ranking
3739

Joanne Berger-Sweeney publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne Berger-Sweeney sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joanne Berger-Sweeney D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne Berger-Sweeney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Joanne Berger-Sweeney is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States. Their research is situated primarily within the social sciences, with a focus on education and early childhood education and development.

The scientist has contributed to the body of academic literature with papers published in notable venues. One recent publication is titled Diversity in Neuroscience: How This Moment Is Different, published in 2023 in the Journal of Neuroscience.

  • Journal of Neuroscience

The researcher's main fields and subfields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Education

Primary topics addressed in their work are:

  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Joanne Berger-Sweeney has been recognized by professional organizations with the following awards:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, awarded in 2018
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 2012

Best Publications

  • Differential effects on spatial navigation of immunotoxin-induced cholinergic lesions of the medial septal area and nucleus basalis magnocellularis

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;Stephan Heckers;Marek Marsel Mesulam;Ronald G. Wiley

  • Reference memory, anxiety and estrous cyclicity in C57BL/6NIA mice are affected by age and sex.

    K.M. Frick;L.A. Burlingame;J.A. Arters;J. Berger-Sweeney

  • Gene knockout of glycine transporter 1: Characterization of the behavioral phenotype

    Guochuan Tsai;Rebecca J. Ralph-Williams;Marzia Martina;Richard Bergeron

  • Behavioral consequences of abnormal cortical development: insights into developmental disabilities

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;Christine F. Hohmann

  • Behavioral and anatomical abnormalities in Mecp2 mutant mice: a model for Rett syndrome.

    N.A. Stearns;L.R. Schaevitz;H. Bowling;N. Nag

  • Preclinical research in Rett syndrome: Setting the foundation for translational success

    David M. Katz;Joanne E. Berger-Sweeney;James H. Eubanks;Monica J. Justice

  • Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Spatial Memory and Neurochemistry in Middle-Aged Mice

    Karyn M. Frick;Nancy A. Stearns;Jing-Yu Pan;Joanne Berger-Sweeney

  • Mice are not little rats: species differences in a one-day water maze task.

    Karyn M. Frick;Erica T. Stillner;Joanne Berger-Sweeney

  • Selective Immunolesions of Cholinergic Neurons in Mice: Effects on Neuroanatomy, Neurochemistry, and Behavior

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;Nancy A. Stearns;Stephanie L. Murg;Laura R. Floerke-Nashner

  • Sex differences in learning and memory in mice: effects of sequence of testing and cholinergic blockade.

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;Amy Arnold;Darlene Gabeau;Jennifer Mills

  • Spatial reference memory and neocortical neurochemistry vary with the estrous cycle in C57BL/6 mice.

    K. M. Frick;J. Berger-Sweeney

  • An altered neonatal behavioral phenotype in mecp2 mutant mice

    Jonathan D Picker;Rebecca Yang;Laura Ricceri;Joanne Berger-Sweeney

  • The cholinergic basal forebrain system during development and its influence on cognitive processes: important questions and potential answers.

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney

  • Reduced extinction of hippocampal-dependent memories in CPEB knockout mice.

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;N. Ruth Zearfoss;Joel D. Richter

  • Postnatal dietary choline supplementation alters behavior in a mouse model of Rett syndrome

    Nupur Nag;Joanne E. Berger-Sweeney

  • Impairments in learning and memory accompanied by neurodegeneration in mice transgenic for the carboxyl-terminus of the amyloid precursor protein.

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;Donna L McPhie;Jill A Arters;Jane Greenan

  • Cholinergic basal forebrain is critical for social transmission of food preferences.

    Joanne Berger-Sweeney;Nancy A. Stearns;Karyn M. Frick;Binta Beard

  • Environmental enrichment alters locomotor behaviour and ventricular volume in Mecp21lox mice

    Nupur Nag;Jennifer M. Moriuchi;Cassandra G.K. Peitzman;Bonnie C. Ward

  • Gene–Environment Interactions and Epigenetic Pathways in Autism: The Importance of One-Carbon Metabolism

    Laura R. Schaevitz;Joanne E. Berger-Sweeney

  • Early neonatal 192 IgG saporin induces learning impairments and disrupts cortical morphogenesis in rats

    Laura Ricceri;Christine Hohmann;Joanne Berger-Sweeney

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura Ricceri
Laura Ricceri Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Karyn M. Frick
Karyn M. Frick University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Joseph T. Coyle
Joseph T. Coyle Harvard University
Mark G. Baxter
Mark G. Baxter Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gemma Calamandrei
Gemma Calamandrei Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Rachael L. Neve
Rachael L. Neve Harvard University
Huda Y. Zoghbi
Huda Y. Zoghbi Baylor College of Medicine
Igor Branchi
Igor Branchi Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Jacqueline N. Crawley
Jacqueline N. Crawley University of California, Davis
Monica J. Justice
Monica J. Justice Hospital for Sick Children

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to diverse and rewarding career pathways in healthcare, research, counseling, and education. If you're looking for flexible learning options, a wide range of accredited online degrees now make it easier to start or advance your career in related fields.

Those interested in social work and mental health can consider accelerated msw programs that are specifically designed for faster completion and practical experience. For students seeking a strong foundation in human behavior, the best online psychology degree programs offer coursework in cognitive neuroscience, behavioral science, and psychological research.

Counseling is another popular path that often requires accredited credentials. If you're aiming for professional licensure, look into cacrep accredited programs, which ensure your degree meets industry standards. Affordability is also key, and many institutions provide online mental health degree programs that fit a variety of budgets.

Pursuing an online degree in these related areas allows you to develop versatile skills and specialize in a field that supports people’s psychological and neurological well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Joanne Berger-Sweeney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles