World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
4832
World Ranking
6705
National Ranking
118

Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 191 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha is affiliated with the State University of Maringa in Brazil. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant contributions to the subfields of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their research topics cover a broad range of aquatic and ecological systems including:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha has published extensively in scientific journals with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Hydrobiologia
  • Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
  • Limnologica
  • International Review of Hydrobiology
  • Limnology and Oceanography

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Human pressure drives biodiversity-multifunctionality relationships in large Neotropical wetlands, 2022, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Scale-dependent patterns of metacommunity structuring in aquatic organisms across floodplain systems, 2020, Journal of Biogeography
  • Zooplankton taxonomic and functional structure is determined by macrophytes and fish predation in a Neotropical river, 2021, Hydrobiologia
  • Towards a synthesis of the biodiversity of freshwater Protozoa, Rotifera, Cladocera, and Copepoda in Brazil, 2022, Limnologica
  • Beta diversity patterns in zooplankton assemblages from a semiarid river ecosystem, 2020, International Review of Hydrobiology

The researcher collaborates regularly with a group of frequent co-authors including:

  • Fernando Miranda Lansac-Tôha
  • Cláudia Cósta Bonecker
  • Tatiane Mantovano
  • Francieli de Fátima Bomfim
  • Luiz Felipe Machado Velho

Best Publications

  • Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure.

    André A. Padial;Fernanda Ceschin;Steven A. J. Declerck;Luc De Meester

  • Biodiversity of zooplankton communities in the Upper Paraná River floodplain: interannual variation from long-term studies

    F A Lansac-Tôha;C C Bonecker;L F M Velho;N R Simões

  • Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing.

    Michael Tessler;Johannes S. Neumann;Ebrahim Afshinnekoo;Ebrahim Afshinnekoo;Michael Pineda

  • Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems.

    Paloma M. Lopes;Luis M. Bini;Steven A. J. Declerck;Vinicius F. Farjalla

  • Community structure of rotifers in two environments of the upper River Paraná floodplain (MS) - Brazil

    C. C. Bonecker;F. A. Lansac-Tôha

  • Human pressure drives biodiversity–multifunctionality relationships in large Neotropical wetlands

    Unknown

  • Floods control the influence of environmental gradients on the diversity of zooplankton communities in a neotropical floodplain

    Nadson Ressyé Simões;Juliana Déo Dias;Clarice Maria Leal;Louizi de Souza Magalhães Braghin

  • Planktonic and non-planktonic rotifers in two environments of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

    Cláudia C. Bonecker;Fábio A. Lansac-Tôha;Dayane C. Rossa

  • Testate Amoebae (Rhizopodea-Sarcodina) from Zooplankton of the High Paraná River Floodplain, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil: I. Families Arcellidae and Centropyxidae

    L F M Velho;F A Lansac-Tôha;M Serafim-Junior

  • Spatial and temporal variation in densities of testate amoebae in the plankton of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil

    L.F.M. Velho;F.A. Lansac-Tôha;L.M. Bini

  • Impact of reservoirs on zooplankton diversity and implications for the conservation of natural aquatic environments

    Nadson R. Simões;Ariádine H. Nunes;Juliana D. Dias;Fábio A. Lansac-Tôha

  • Temporal changes in zooplankton species diversity in response to environmental changes in an alluvial valley

    Claudia Costa Bonecker;Nadson Ressyé Simões;Carolina Viviane Minte-Vera;Fabio Amodeo Lansac-Tôha

  • Pleuston communities are buffered from regional flood pulses: the example of ostracods in the Paraná River floodplain, Brazil

    Janet Higuti;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho;Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha;Koen Martens

  • Cladocera fauna composition in a river-lagoon system of the upper Paraná River floodplain, with a new record for Brazil

    Serafim Júnior M;Lansac-Tôha Fa;Paggi Jc;Velho Lf

  • Zooplankton biomass in tropical reservoirs in southern Brazil

    Claudia Costa Bonecker;Mariza Yuri Nagae;Martin Cesar Maria Bletller;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho

  • Differently dispersing organism groups show contrasting beta diversity patterns in a dammed subtropical river basin

    Fernando M. Lansac-Tôha;Jani Heino;Bárbara A. Quirino;Geovani A. Moresco

  • Diversity and Abundance of the Planktonic Rotifers in Different Environments of the Upper Paraná River Floodplain (Paraná State – Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil)

    Cláudia Costa Bonecker;Christiane Luciana Da Costa;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho;Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

  • Intra and inter-annual structure of zooplankton communities in floodplain lakes: a long-term ecological research study.

    Nadson R. Simões;Fábio A. Lansac-Tôha;Luiz Felipe Machado Velho;Claudia C. Bonecker

  • Influence of Environmental Heterogeneity on the Structure of Testate Amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) Assemblages in the Plankton of the Upper Paraná River Floodplain, Brazil

    Luiz Felipe Machado Velho;Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha;Luis Mauricio Bini

  • Hydrological dynamics drives zooplankton metacommunity structure in a Neotropical floodplain

    Juliana Déo Dias;Nadson Ressyé Simões;Mariana Meerhoff;Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

  • Zooplankton assemblage concordance patterns in Brazilian reservoirs

    Luis Mauricio Bini;Leo Caetano F. da Silva;Luiz Felipe M. Velho;Claudia C. Bonecker

  • Evidence against the use of surrogates for biomonitoring of Neotropical floodplains

    André A. Padial;André A. Padial;Steven A. J. Declerck;Luc De Meester;Cláudia C. Bonecker

Frequent Co-Authors

Luiz Felipe Machado Velho
Luiz Felipe Machado Velho State University of Maringa
Claudia Costa Bonecker
Claudia Costa Bonecker State University of Maringa
Luis Mauricio Bini
Luis Mauricio Bini Universidade Federal de Goiás
Koen Martens
Koen Martens Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
André Andrian Padial
André Andrian Padial Federal University of Paraná
Jani Heino
Jani Heino University of Oulu
Tadeu Siqueira
Tadeu Siqueira Sao Paulo State University
Luc De Meester
Luc De Meester Freie Universität Berlin
Rob DeSalle
Rob DeSalle American Museum of Natural History

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Ecology and Evolution, there are a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your expertise and career options. Many students choose interdisciplinary study to broaden their skills or pivot into emerging areas that complement an ecological background.

For those interested in the intersection between human behavior and environmental issues, earning a masters degree in counseling online can provide valuable tools for community outreach and environmental education. If you wish to apply psychological principles in a legal or investigative context, you might ask, what can you do with a masters in forensic psychology? This pathway can lead to careers that integrate science, law, and advocacy.

Those passionate about working with younger generations might opt for child psychology masters programs online, opening doors to education and youth programs aligned with conservation and environmental science. Additionally, pursuing an online master's in counseling can offer versatile career pathways, including roles in wellness, crisis intervention, and ecological therapy.

By exploring these online degree options, you can amplify your impact as an environmental professional while unlocking new avenues for growth and contribution.

Best Scientists Citing Fábio Amodêo Lansac-Tôha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles