World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4760 4405 38 38 199 7260

Claudia R. Binder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudia R. Binder between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudia R. Binder published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 31 of the 262 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 1966: 2 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 19 publications
1966 2025

262 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudia R. Binder: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 2
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 9
2008 2
2009 7
2010 18
2011 10
2012 5
2013 8
2014 10
2015 11
2016 13
2017 21
2018 17
2019 14
2020 23
2021 24
2022 4
2023 10
2024 12
2025 19
Total 262
Download as CSV

Claudia R. Binder publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia R. Binder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 199 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 199
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudia R. Binder D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia R. Binder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Claudia R. Binder is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Environmental Science and Engineering.

Their work covers a variety of subfields including Molecular Biology, Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, as well as Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

Frequent topics of interest in their research include:

  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Sustainable Industrial Ecology

Claudia R. Binder has published extensively in several venues, with notable frequency in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Sustainability
  • Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

They have co-authored multiple papers with several collaborators, including:

  • Ralph Hansmann (12 publications)
  • Anna Pagani (11 publications)
  • Annalen Bleckmann (9 publications)
  • Aristide Athanassiadis (9 publications)
  • Kerstin Menck (8 publications)

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Claudia R. Binder include:

  • Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers (2020) in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Indicators for urban sustainability: Key lessons from a systematic analysis of 67 measurement initiatives (2020) in Ecological Indicators
  • Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of university students and staff from diverse faculties at a Swiss University (2020) in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Microvesicles in Cancer: Small Size, Large Potential (2020) in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research (2020) in European Journal of Futures Research

In addition to journal articles, Claudia R. Binder has contributed to book publications. One notable publication is Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems, published in 2020 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems

    Claudia R. Binder;Jochen Hinkel;Pieter W. G. Bots;Claudia Pahl-Wostl

  • Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture

    Claudia R. Binder;Claudia R. Binder;Giuseppe Feola;Julia K. Steinberger;Julia K. Steinberger

  • Functions of scenarios in transition processes

    Arnim Wiek;Claudia Binder;Roland W. Scholz

  • Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions

    Arnim Wiek;Claudia R. Binder

  • Towards an improved understanding of farmers' behaviour: The integrative agent-centred (IAC) framework

    Giuseppe Feola;Claudia R. Binder;Claudia R. Binder

  • Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts

    Laura Würtenberger;Thomas Koellner;Claudia R. Binder

  • Increasing organic food consumption: An integrating model of drivers and barriers

    Ralph Hansmann;Ivo Philippe Baur;Claudia R. Binder

  • A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases

    Jochen Hinkel;Michael E. Cox;Maja Schlüter;Claudia R. Binder

  • Scenarios for vulnerability: opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk

    Joern Birkmann;Susan L. Cutter;Dale S. Rothman;Torsten Welle

  • Indicators for urban sustainability: Key lessons from a systematic analysis of 67 measurement initiatives

    Albert Merino-Saum;Pekka Jaakko Halla;Valeria Superti;Anne Boesch

  • From material flow analysis to material flow management Part I: social sciences modeling approaches coupled to MFA

    Claudia R. Binder;Claudia R. Binder

  • Transition towards a new global change science: Requirements for methodologies, methods, data and knowledge

    Claudia Pahl-Wostl;Carlo Giupponi;Keith Richards;Claudia R. Binder

  • Transition towards improved regional wood flows by integrating material flux analysis and agent analysis : the case of Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Switzerland

    Claudia R. Binder;Christoph Hofer;Arnim Wiek;Roland W. Scholz

  • GeoFarmer: A monitoring and feedback system for agricultural development projects.

    Anton Eitzinger;Anton Eitzinger;James Cock;Karl Atzmanstorfer;Claudia R. Binder;Claudia R. Binder

  • Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of university students and staff from diverse faculties at a Swiss University

    Ralph Hansmann;Rafael Laurenti;Rafael Laurenti;Tarik Mehdi;Claudia R. Binder

  • Analysis of intra-country virtual water trade strategy to alleviate water scarcity in Iran

    Monireh Faramarzi;Monireh Faramarzi;Hong X. Yang;Jamshid Mousavi;R. Schulin

  • Risk perception and decision-making: do farmers consider risks from climate change?

    Anton Eitzinger;Anton Eitzinger;Claudia R. Binder;Claudia R. Binder;Markus A. Meyer

  • The reality of transdisciplinarity: a framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders.

    Claudia R. Binder;Iris Absenger-Helmli;Thorsten Schilling

  • From material flow analysis to material flow management Part II: the role of structural agent analysis

    Claudia R. Binder;Claudia R. Binder

  • Pesticide uptake in potatoes: model and field experiments.

    Ronnie Juraske;Carmen S. Mosquera Vivas;Alexander Erazo Velásquez;Glenda García Santos

  • Why Don't Pesticide Applicators Protect Themselves?

    Giuseppe Feola;Claudia R. Binder

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel J. Lang
Daniel J. Lang Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Julia K. Steinberger
Julia K. Steinberger University of Lausanne
Arnim Wiek
Arnim Wiek Arizona State University
Jochen Hinkel
Jochen Hinkel Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Claudia Pahl-Wostl Osnabrück University
Christian Folberth
Christian Folberth International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Maja Schlüter
Maja Schlüter Stockholm University
Astrid Oberson
Astrid Oberson ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a vast range of online degrees and professional avenues. For students with a keen interest in mental health and behavior, choosing the most affordable online psychology degree is a practical way to start a career in counseling, research, or human services while managing costs.

Those passionate about community support can consider the masters in social work online. These programs cater to diverse academic backgrounds and prepare graduates for rewarding roles in social work, advocacy, and clinical practice.

Students interested in advanced clinical credentials may explore psy d programs for in-depth training in applied psychology, assessment, and therapy—key for those aiming to become licensed psychologists.

Another pathway is specializing in relationships and family dynamics through the marriage and family therapy online programs. These programs offer a fast track to becoming a certified therapist, helping couples and families overcome challenges.

With flexible, online options, pursuing these degrees can open doors to fulfilling, in-demand careers across the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia R. Binder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles