World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
84
Citations
27181
World Ranking
787
National Ranking
337

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
73
Citations
21592
World Ranking
851
National Ranking
296

Olivier Jolliet publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Jolliet sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 364 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Olivier Jolliet D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Jolliet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier Jolliet is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a specific emphasis on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. Additional areas of study include ecology, public health related to environmental and occupational health, environmental engineering, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Their work covers a range of topics including agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, air quality and health impacts, environmental impact and sustainability more broadly, effects and risks of endocrine-disrupting chemicals, nutritional studies and diet, recycling and waste management techniques, and carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment.

Jolliet has published numerous papers across various scientific journals. Recent publications include:

  • "LC-IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method," 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • "A framework for the assessment of marine litter impacts in life cycle impact assessment," 2021, Ecological Indicators
  • "Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment-part I: a critical review of existing methods," 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • "Chemicals of concern in plastic toys," 2020, Environment International
  • "Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment: part II- recommendations on application-dependent use of existing methods and on future method development needs," 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jolliet include Peter Fantke, Lei Huang, Vy Kim Nguyen, Justin A. Colacino, and Nicolò Aurisano.

The scientist's work has appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • Environment International

Jolliet has contributed to book publications as well, including a title published by FAO eBooks: "Integration of environment and nutrition in life cycle assessment of food items: opportunities and challenges," published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology

    Olivier Jolliet;Manuele Margni;Raphaël Charles;Sébastien Humbert

  • USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment

    Ralph K. Rosenbaum;Till M. Bachmann;Lois Swirsky Gold;Mark A. J. Huijbregts

  • System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches

    Sangwon Suh;Manfred Lenzen;Graham J. Treloar;Hiroki Hondo

  • Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice.

    D. W. Pennington;J. Potting;Göran Finnveden;E. Lindeijer

  • Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment

    Michael Zwicky Hauschild;Mark Goedkoop;Jeroen Guinée;Reinout Heijungs

  • Life cycle impact assessment of pesticides on human health and ecosystems

    M. Margni;D. Rossier;P. Crettaz;O. Jolliet

  • Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture

    R Clift;A Audsley;S Alber;S Cowell

  • Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics

    T Corbière-Nicollier;B Gfeller Laban;L Lundquist;Y Leterrier

  • IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method

    Cécile Bulle;Cécile Bulle;Manuele Margni;Laure Patouillard;Laure Patouillard;Anne-Marie Boulay

  • Defining intake fraction.

    Deborah H. Bennett;Thomas E. McKone;John S. Evans;William W. Nazaroff

  • Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment

    Helias A. Udo de Haes;Olivier Jolliet;Göran Finnveden;Michael Hauschild

  • The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

    Olivier Jolliet;Ruedi Müller-Wenk;Jane Bare;Alan Brent

  • Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony.

    Michael Z. Hauschild;Mark Huijbregts;Olivier Jolliet;Matt Macleod

  • Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan.

    Jinglan Hong;Jingmin Hong;Masahiro Otaki;Olivier Jolliet

  • Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice

    H.A Udo de Haes;G Finnveden;M Goedkoop;M Hauschild

  • Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: energy and global warming analysis

    G. Houillon;O. Jolliet

  • The effect of climate on tomato transpiration in greenhouses : measurements and models comparison

    O Jolliet;B.J Bailey

  • Apparent Half-Lives of Dioxins, Furans, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls as a Function of Age, Body Fat, Smoking Status, and Breast-Feeding

    Meghan O Grady Milbrath;Yvan Wenger;C. W Chiung Wen Chang;Claude Emond

  • Health impact and damage cost assessment of pesticides in Europe.

    Peter Fantke;Rainer Friedrich;Olivier Jolliet

  • Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: Spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe

    David W. Pennington;Manuele Margni;Christoph Ammann;Olivier Jolliet

  • USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties

    Ralph K. Rosenbaum;Mark Huijbregts;Andrew D. Henderson;Manuele Margni

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Fantke
Peter Fantke Technical University of Denmark
Manuele Margni
Manuele Margni Polytechnique Montréal
Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Michael Zwicky Hauschild Technical University of Denmark
Thomas E. McKone
Thomas E. McKone University of California, Berkeley
Mark A. J. Huijbregts
Mark A. J. Huijbregts Radboud University
Brenda W. Gillespie
Brenda W. Gillespie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeroen B. Guinée
Jeroen B. Guinée Leiden University
Dik van de Meent
Dik van de Meent Radboud University
Bradley G. Ridoutt
Bradley G. Ridoutt Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degree options can complement this field. Programs such as the cheapest online dsw programs offer opportunities to pursue advanced social work degrees, which can intersect with environmental justice and community outreach careers.

If you're looking for flexibility, a cheap online general studies degree provides a broad foundational knowledge, allowing students to tailor their coursework to include environmental topics alongside other disciplines.

Many students wonder about the difficulty of degree programs. Resources highlighting what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help prospective learners identify paths that match their learning style and career goals while maintaining relevance to environmental fields.

For a more specialized focus, pursuing a geology degree online offers in-depth knowledge of earth sciences, which is highly valuable in environmental consulting, conservation, and natural resource management industries.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Jolliet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles