World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8575
World Ranking
6050
National Ranking
213

Bradley G. Ridoutt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley G. Ridoutt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Bradley G. Ridoutt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bradley G. Ridoutt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bradley G. Ridoutt is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia and focuses primarily on environmental science. Their research encompasses several subfields, including ecology, environmental engineering, public health related to environmental and occupational health, global and planetary change, and food science.

The scientist's work is centered around key topics such as agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, environmental impact and sustainability, food waste reduction and sustainability, nutritional studies and diet, climate change and health impacts, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and water-energy-food nexus studies.

Ridoutt has published extensively in venues specializing in environmental and sustainability issues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Nutrients
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Their recent scholarly papers highlight a focus on diet, environmental impact, and climate change. Notable publications include:

  • "Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations," 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Potential GHG emission benefits of Asparagopsis taxiformis feed supplement in Australian beef cattle feedlots," 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "A planetary boundary-based environmental footprint family: From impacts to boundaries," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "The role of dairy foods in lower greenhouse gas emission and higher diet quality dietary patterns," 2020, European Journal of Nutrition
  • "Short communication: climate impact of Australian livestock production assessed using the GWP* climate metric," 2021, Livestock Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ridoutt include:

  • Danielle Baird
  • Gilly A. Hendrie
  • Javier Navarro Garcia
  • Laura Scherer
  • Jing Huang

The breadth of Ridoutt's research reflects a multidisciplinary approach to understanding and mitigating environmental impacts in agriculture, food systems, and public health contexts. Their work contributes to discussions on sustainability, climate metrics, and dietary impacts with a regional focus on Australian livestock systems and global perspectives on planetary boundaries.

Best Publications

  • The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE)

    Anne Marie Boulay;Anne Marie Boulay;Jane Bare;Lorenzo Benini;Markus Berger

  • A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Stephan Pfister

  • Nitrogen and phosphorus losses and eutrophication potential associated with fertilizer application to cropland in China

    Jing Huang;Chang-chun Xu;Bradley G. Ridoutt;Bradley G. Ridoutt;Xue-chun Wang

  • Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment

    Anna Kounina;Anna Kounina;Manuele Margni;Manuele Margni;Jean-Baptiste Bayart;Anne-Marie Boulay

  • Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) “A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA”

    Stephan Pfister;Anne-Marie Boulay;Markus Berger;Michalis Hadjikakou

  • LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

    Francesca Verones;Jane Bare;Cecile Bulle;Rolf Frischknecht

  • Carbon and water footprint tradeoffs in fresh tomato production

    Girija Page;Brad Ridoutt;Bill Bellotti

  • A new water footprint calculation method integrating consumptive and degradative water use into a single stand-alone weighted indicator

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Stephan Pfister

  • Water footprinting at the product brand level: case study and future challenges.

    B.G. Ridoutt;S.J. Eady;J. Sellahewa;L. Simons

  • The water footprint of food waste: case study of fresh mango in Australia.

    B.G. Ridoutt;P. Juliano;P. Sanguansri;J. Sellahewa

  • Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Peerasak Sanguansri;Michael Freer;Gregory S. Harper

  • Dietary Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impact: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base

    Bradley G Ridoutt;Bradley G Ridoutt;Gilly A Hendrie;Manny Noakes

  • Reducing humanity’s water footprint

    Bradley G Ridoutt;Stephan Pfister

  • Consensus building on the development of a stress-based indicator for LCA-based impact assessment of water consumption : outcome of the expert workshops

    Anne-Marie Boulay;Jane Bare;Camillo De Camillis;Petra Döll

  • Overconsumption of Energy and Excessive Discretionary Food Intake Inflates Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia

    Gilly A. Hendrie;Danielle Baird;Brad Ridoutt;Michalis Hadjikakou

  • Carbon, water and land use footprints of beef cattle production systems in southern Australia

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Girija Page;Kimberley Opie;Jing Huang

  • Environmental performance of local food: trade-offs and implications for climate resilience in a developed city

    Alison Rothwell;Brad Ridoutt;Girija Page;William D Bellotti

  • Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study

    Rolf Frischknecht;Peter Fantke;Laura Tschümperlin;Monia Niero

  • Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet-comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes

    Gilly A. Hendrie;Brad G. Ridoutt;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Manny Noakes

  • Short communication: The water footprint of dairy products: case study involving skim milk powder.

    B.G. Ridoutt;S.R.O. Williams;S. Baud;S. Fraval

  • Meat consumption and water scarcity: beware of generalizations

    Bradley G. Ridoutt;Peerasak Sanguansri;Michelle Nolan;Nicki Marks

Frequent Co-Authors

Jing Huang
Jing Huang Peking University
Manny Noakes
Manny Noakes Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Manuele Margni
Manuele Margni Polytechnique Montréal
Peter Fantke
Peter Fantke Technical University of Denmark
Luís Arroja
Luís Arroja University of Aveiro
Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Michael Zwicky Hauschild Technical University of Denmark
Olivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rattan Lal
Rattan Lal The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students complement their scientific expertise with social science knowledge by enrolling in a sociology bachelor degree online program. This combination broadens understanding of human-environment interactions, which is essential for addressing complex environmental challenges.

For professionals aiming to advance in academia or leadership roles, online options such as doctorate degree online no dissertation offer flexible paths that reduce traditional barriers like lengthy research projects. These programs emphasize practical skills, allowing students to balance career and education effectively.

Educators and practitioners focused on environmental policy and education may also benefit from transitioning through eds to edd programs. This route enhances leadership abilities in environmental education settings, preparing graduates to influence curriculum development and community outreach.

Additionally, those interested in social welfare related to environmental justice might explore dsw programs online, blending social work expertise with environmental advocacy. This interdisciplinary skill set is increasingly valuable in promoting sustainable, equitable solutions worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Bradley G. Ridoutt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles