World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
Australia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
76
Citations
29850
World Ranking
333
National Ranking
5

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
76
Citations
31049
World Ranking
979
National Ranking
81

Thomas Wiedmann publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Wiedmann sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 170 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Thomas Wiedmann D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Wiedmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Economics and Finance in Australia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Economics and Finance in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Thomas Wiedmann is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a substantial number of publications addressing various interrelated fields and topics within this discipline.

The main field of study for Wiedmann is Environmental Science, with specific subfields including Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, as well as Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their work covers key topics such as Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies, Climate Change Policy and Economics, Urban Transport and Accessibility, Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, and Air Quality and Health Impacts.

Wiedmann has authored or coauthored several papers published in notable academic journals. Selected recent papers include:

  • A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018 (2021, Environmental Research Letters)
  • Scientists' warning on affluence (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Global socio-economic losses and environmental gains from the Coronavirus pandemic (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Implementing the material footprint to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 12 (2021, Nature Sustainability)
  • Three-scope carbon emission inventories of global cities (2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology)

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include Cameron Allen, Manfred Lenzen, Mengyu Li, Graciela Metternicht, and Gail Broadbent.

Their studies are regularly published in journals such as the Journal of Cleaner Production, Environmental Research Letters, Nature Communications, Journal of Industrial Ecology, and PLoS ONE. Wiedmann has contributed numerous articles to these venues, reflecting ongoing engagement with topical issues in environmental and sustainability sciences.

Best Publications

  • A definition of “carbon footprint”

    Tommy Wiedmann;Jan Minx

  • The material footprint of nations.

    Thomas O. Wiedmann;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Heinz Schandl;Manfred Lenzen;Daniel Moran

  • A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting

    Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint

    Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra;Thomas O. Wiedmann

  • Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet

    Alessandro Galli;Thomas Wiedmann;Ertug Ercin;Doris Knoblauch

  • A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018

    William F. Lamb;Thomas Wiedmann;Julia Pongratz;Robbie Andrew

  • Scientists’ warning on affluence

    Thomas Wiedmann;Manfred Lenzen;Lorenz T. Keyßer;Julia K. Steinberger

  • Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade

    Thomas Wiedmann;Manfred Lenzen;Karen Turner;John Barrett

  • Environmental and social footprints of international trade

    Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann;Manfred Lenzen

  • Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice

    Manfred Lenzen;Joy Murray;Fabian Sack;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis

    Thomas Wiedmann;Jan Minx;John Barrett;Mathis Wackernagel

  • Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions

    Heinz Schandl;Heinz Schandl;Steve Hatfield-Dodds;Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann;Arne Geschke

  • INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS

    J. C. Minx;T. Wiedmann;R. Wood;G. P. Peters

  • Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries

    Cameron Allen;Graciela Metternicht;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages

    Cameron Allen;Graciela Metternicht;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints

    Klaus Hubacek;Dabo Guan;John Barrett;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework

    Brad R. Ewing;Troy R. Hawkins;Troy R. Hawkins;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Alessandro Galli

  • Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis

    Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann;Harry C. Wilting;Manfred Lenzen;Stephan Lutter

  • Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study

    John Barrett;Glen Philip Peters;Thomas Wiedmann;Kate Scott

  • Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis

    Karen Turner;Manfred Lenzen;Thomas Wiedmann;John Barrett

  • Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK

    Jan Minx;Giovanni Baiocchi;Giovanni Baiocchi;Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann;John Barrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Lenzen
Manfred Lenzen University of Sydney
John Barrett
John Barrett University of Leeds
Jan Minx
Jan Minx University of Leeds
Heinz Schandl
Heinz Schandl Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Robert H. Crawford
Robert H. Crawford University of Melbourne
Daniel Moran
Daniel Moran Norwegian Institute for Air Research
Dabo Guan
Dabo Guan Tsinghua University
Graciela Metternicht
Graciela Metternicht University of New South Wales
Richard Wood
Richard Wood Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Karlheinz Ballschmiter
Karlheinz Ballschmiter University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Economics and Finance, there are many flexible online degree options that can help you diversify your skillset and advance your career. For those seeking leadership roles, pursuing an online MBA under 35k offers an affordable pathway, blending financial principles with practical business management skills.

The importance of digital marketing knowledge is rapidly growing. Specializing with an online digital marketing degree with social media focus can help you understand modern marketing strategies and data analytics—crucial for success in today's marketplace.

For those passionate about client interaction and global business, hospitality degrees online are a strong complement. These programs offer insights into financial operations unique to the hospitality industry, expanding your job options.

Finally, if quality and accreditation are priorities, consider an aacsb accredited online mba. Attending a program with AACSB accreditation ensures recognized standards in business education, supporting long-term employability and advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Wiedmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles