World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
12644
World Ranking
3812
National Ranking
290

John Barrett publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Barrett sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 128 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John Barrett D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Barrett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Barrett is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions to renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental impact assessment.

The main fields of study for Barrett include Environmental Science, with subfields covering Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, and Pollution.

Barrett's research addresses various key topics such as Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Climate Change Policy and Economics, Energy and Environment Impacts, Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, and Air Quality and Health Impacts.

The scientist has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications, with notable recent papers including:

  • Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom, 2022, published in Nature Energy
  • Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options, 2020, published in Environmental Research Letters
  • Three-scope carbon emission inventories of global cities, 2020, published in Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • A "spatially just" transition? A critical review of regional equity in decarbonisation pathways, 2022, published in Energy Research & Social Science
  • Reducing inequality resulting from UK low-carbon policy, 2020, published in Climate Policy

Barrett frequently publishes in several academic journals, including:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Nature Energy
  • Energy Policy
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • Energy Research & Social Science

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, with frequent collaborations listed as:

  • Jonathan Norman (12 joint publications)
  • Alice Garvey (9 joint publications)
  • Sam Betts-Davies (6 joint publications)
  • Anne Owen (6 joint publications)
  • Peter Taylor (5 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade

    Thomas Wiedmann;Manfred Lenzen;Karen Turner;John Barrett

  • Allocating ecological footprints to final consumption categories with input–output analysis

    Thomas Wiedmann;Jan Minx;John Barrett;Mathis Wackernagel

  • INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS

    J. C. Minx;T. Wiedmann;R. Wood;G. P. Peters

  • Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options

    Diana Ivanova;John Barrett;Dominik Wiedenhofer;Biljana Macura

  • Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints

    Klaus Hubacek;Dabo Guan;John Barrett;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study

    John Barrett;Glen Philip Peters;Thomas Wiedmann;Kate Scott

  • Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 1: A technical note on combining input–output and ecological footprint analysis

    Karen Turner;Manfred Lenzen;Thomas Wiedmann;John Barrett

  • A research agenda for improving national Ecological Footprint accounts

    Justin Kitzes;Alessandro Galli;Marco Bagliani;John Barrett

  • Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK

    Jan Minx;Giovanni Baiocchi;Giovanni Baiocchi;Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann;John Barrett

  • A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods

    Thomas Wiedmann;John Barrett

  • Application of hybrid life cycle approaches to emerging energy technologies--the case of wind power in the UK

    Thomas O. Wiedmann;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Sangwon Suh;Kuishuang Feng;Manfred Lenzen

  • Construction sector views on low carbon building materials

    Jannik Giesekam;John R. Barrett;Peter Taylor

  • Drivers, Trends and Mitigation

    Gabriel Blanco;Reyer Gerlagh;Sangwon Suh;Alfred K.Ofosu Ahenkorah

  • Consumption-based carbon accounting: does it have a future?

    Stavros Afionis;Marco Sakai;Kate Scott;John Barrett

  • A material flow analysis and Ecological Footprint of York

    John Barrett;Harry Vallack;Gary Haq

  • Successful Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With a Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Peripheral-Blood Progenitor-Cell Transplant: Evidence for a Graft-Versus-Tumor Effect

    Richard W. Childs;Emmanuel Clave;John Tisdale;Michelle Plante

  • Identifying critical supply chains and final products: An input-output approach to exploring the energy-water-food nexus

    Anne Owen;Kate Scott;John Barrett

  • Identification of 'carbon hot-spots' and quantification of GHG intensities in the biodiesel supply chain using hybrid LCA and structural path analysis.

    Adolf Acquaye;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Thomas O. Wiedmann;Kuishuang Feng;Robert H. Crawford

  • Companies on the Scale

    Thomas O. Wiedmann;Manfred Lenzen;John R. Barrett

  • Energy demand reduction options for meeting national zero-emission targets in the United Kingdom

    Unknown

  • The greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for materials used in UK construction

    Jannik Giesekam;John Barrett;Peter Taylor;Anne Owen

  • The Concept of City Carbon Maps: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia

    Thomas O. Wiedmann;Guangwu Chen;John Barrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wiedmann
Thomas Wiedmann University of New South Wales
Manfred Lenzen
Manfred Lenzen University of Sydney
Jan Minx
Jan Minx University of Leeds
Richard Childs
Richard Childs National Institutes of Health
Timothy J. Foxon
Timothy J. Foxon University of Sussex
Andy Gouldson
Andy Gouldson University of Leeds
Nicholas Frank Pidgeon
Nicholas Frank Pidgeon Cardiff University
Dabo Guan
Dabo Guan Tsinghua University
Kuishuang Feng
Kuishuang Feng University of Hong Kong
Klaus Hubacek
Klaus Hubacek University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many start with an easiest bachelors degree to build foundational knowledge before specializing. Online programs now offer flexibility without compromising quality.

Specialized fields like geoscience are critical to understanding Earth’s processes. Pursuing a geoscience online degree equips students with skills in geology, environmental monitoring, and natural resource management.

Another impactful pathway is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). A top gis degree programs can lead to careers in mapping, spatial analysis, and environmental planning, essential for tackling climate change and urban development challenges.

For those aiming to combine science with public leadership, a one year mpa offers advanced skills in policy and administration, preparing graduates to influence environmental regulations and sustainable initiatives effectively.

Best Scientists Citing John Barrett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles