World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
12953
World Ranking
3686
National Ranking
208

Pierre Drapeau publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Drapeau sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Pierre Drapeau D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Drapeau sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre Drapeau is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in ecology and its subfields.

Their work spans several subfields of study including:

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Insect Science
  • Neurology

Key topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Forest ecology and management

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Interpericyte tunnelling nanotubes regulate neurovascular coupling," 2020, Nature
  • "Tree-Related Microhabitats Are Promising Yet Underused Tools for Biodiversity and Nature Conservation: A Systematic Review for International Perspectives," 2022, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • "Transmission patterns of tick-borne pathogens among birds and rodents in a forested park in southeastern Canada," 2022, PLoS ONE
  • "Global patterns and environmental drivers of forest functional composition," 2023, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • "Lowering the rate of timber harvesting to mitigate impacts of climate change on boreal caribou habitat quality in eastern Canada," 2022, The Science of The Total Environment

Drapeau frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • The Forestry Chronicle
  • Nature
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Martin-Hugues St-Laurent
  • Nicolas Bélanger
  • Nicole J. Fenton
  • Ariane Dumas
  • Catherine Bouchard

Best Publications

  • Time course of the development of motor behaviors in the zebrafish embryo

    Louis Saint-Amant;Pierre Drapeau

  • Gain and loss of function of ALS-related mutations of TARDBP (TDP-43) cause motor deficits in vivo.

    Edor Kabashi;Li Lin;Miranda L. Tradewell;Patrick A. Dion

  • Development of the locomotor network in zebrafish.

    Pierre Drapeau;Louis Saint-Amant;Robert Rr Buss;Mabel Chong

  • De novo mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 in patients ascertained for schizophrenia

    Julie Gauthier;Nathalie Champagne;Ronald G. Lafrenière;Lan Xiong

  • Mutations in SYNGAP1 in autosomal nonsyndromic mental retardation.

    Fadi F. Hamdan;Julie Gauthier;Dan Spiegelman;Anne Noreau

  • Excess of De Novo Deleterious Mutations in Genes Associated with Glutamatergic Systems in Nonsyndromic Intellectual Disability

    Fadi F. Hamdan;Julie Gauthier;Yoichi Araki;Da-Ting Lin

  • Novel de novo SHANK3 mutation in autistic patients.

    Julie Gauthier;Dan Spiegelman;Amélie Piton;Ronald G. Lafrenière

  • Systematic resequencing of X-chromosome synaptic genes in autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia.

    Piton A;Gauthier J;Hamdan Ff;Lafrenière Rg

  • Mutations in VANGL1 Associated with Neural-Tube Defects

    Zoha Kibar;Elena Torban;Jonathan R. McDearmid;Jonathan R. McDearmid;Annie Reynolds;Annie Reynolds

  • Truncating mutations in NRXN2 and NRXN1 in autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia

    Julie Gauthier;Tabrez J. Siddiqui;Peng Huashan;Daisaku Yokomaku

  • Direct Measure of the De Novo Mutation Rate in Autism and Schizophrenia Cohorts

    Philip Awadalla;Julie Gauthier;Rachel A. Myers;Rachel A. Myers;Ferran Casals

  • Interpericyte tunnelling nanotubes regulate neurovascular coupling.

    Luis Alarcon-Martinez;Deborah Villafranca-Baughman;Heberto Quintero;J. Benjamin Kacerovsky

  • Steps during the development of the zebrafish locomotor network

    Edna Brustein;Louis Saint-Amant;Robert R Buss;Mabel Chong

  • De Novo Mutations in FOXP1 in Cases with Intellectual Disability, Autism, and Language Impairment

    Fadi F. Hamdan;Hussein Daoud;Daniel Rochefort;Amélie Piton

  • Motoneuron activity patterns related to the earliest behavior of the zebrafish embryo.

    Louis Saint-Amant;Pierre Drapeau

  • Rare Mutations in N-methyl-D-aspartate Glutamate Receptors in Autism Spectrum Disorders and Schizophrenia

    Tarabeux J;Tarabeux J;Tarabeux J;Kebir O;Kebir O;Gauthier J;Hamdan Ff

  • Synaptic drive to motoneurons during fictive swimming in the developing zebrafish.

    Robert R. Buss;Pierre Drapeau

  • Synchronization of an embryonic network of identified spinal interneurons solely by electrical coupling.

    Louis Saint-Amant;Pierre Drapeau

  • Mutations in the KIAA0196 Gene at the SPG8 Locus Cause Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

    Paul N. Valdmanis;Inge A. Meijer;Annie Reynolds;Adrienne Lei

  • Mutations in the calcium-related gene IL1RAPL1 are associated with autism

    Amélie Piton;Jacques L. Michaud;Huashan Peng;Swaroop Aradhya

  • In vivo recording from identifiable neurons of the locomotor network in the developing zebrafish

    Pierre Drapeau;Declan W Ali;Robert R Buss;Louis Saint-Amant

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy A. Rouleau
Guy A. Rouleau Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fadi F. Hamdan
Fadi F. Hamdan University of Montreal
Eric Fombonne
Eric Fombonne Oregon Health & Science University
Laurent Mottron
Laurent Mottron University of Montreal
Ridha Joober
Ridha Joober Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Marie-Odile Krebs
Marie-Odile Krebs Université Paris Cité
Amélie Piton
Amélie Piton University of Strasbourg
Jacques L. Michaud
Jacques L. Michaud University of Montreal
Lynn E. DeLisi
Lynn E. DeLisi Harvard Medical School
Jean-Claude Lacaille
Jean-Claude Lacaille University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads to a wide array of academic and career options. Many students look for flexible, online pathways that support their interests in brain science, psychology, or mental health. For those interested in clinical practice, choosing one of the cheapest psyd programs can provide an affordable and direct route to becoming a psychologist.

If your focus is on therapeutic work with families or couples, you might consider accredited online mft programs accredited for Marriage and Family Therapy. These programs offer the flexibility to start your counseling career sooner.

For those who want to enter the job market quickly, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees can be a fast-track option, enabling you to complete your undergraduate studies and move directly into neuroscience-adjacent roles or further study.

Financial outcomes are also important to consider. Review 4 year degrees that pay well to ensure your education investment pays off in the long run. Whether you pursue clinical, counseling, or research fields, choosing the right pathway can create a strong foundation for your career.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Drapeau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles