World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ana M. Moura-da-Silva

Ana M. Moura-da-Silva

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 47 2763 2506 5 5 52 3481

Ana M. Moura-da-Silva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ana M. Moura-da-Silva between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ana M. Moura-da-Silva published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2020. 7 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2020. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1990 2025

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ana M. Moura-da-Silva: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 4
2003 5
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 4
2012 5
2013 3
2014 3
2015 5
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 6
2020 14
2021 7
2022 7
2023 9
2024 5
2025 2
Total 130
Download as CSV

Ana M. Moura-da-Silva publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana M. Moura-da-Silva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 47–56 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7 52
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Ana M. Moura-da-Silva D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana M. Moura-da-Silva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 47
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ana M. Moura-da-Silva is affiliated with the Instituto Butantan in Brazil. Their research primarily focuses on venomous animal envenomation and studies, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology as well as immunology and microbiology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies
  • Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins

The scientist's primary fields are further subdivided into subfields such as genetics, virology, paleontology, global and planetary change, and molecular biology. The breadth of their research displays an interdisciplinary approach connecting molecular biology techniques with ecological and epidemiological studies.

Ana M. Moura-da-Silva has authored numerous publications in several journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Toxins
  • Toxicon
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
  • Toxicology Letters

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Phylogenetically diverse diets favor more complex venoms in North American pitvipers," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Bothrops atrox, the most important snake involved in human envenomings in the amazon: How venomics contributes to the knowledge of snake biology and clinical toxinology," 2020, Toxicon X
  • "Tracking the recruitment and evolution of snake toxins using the evolutionary context provided by the Bothrops jararaca genome," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Plant-Derived Toxin Inhibitors as Potential Candidates to Complement Antivenom Treatment in Snakebite Envenomations," 2022, Frontiers in Immunology
  • "Size Matters: An Evaluation of the Molecular Basis of Ontogenetic Modifications in the Composition of Bothrops jararacussu Snake Venom," 2020, Toxins

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers. Some of the most frequent co-authors include:

  • Wuelton Marcelo Monteiro
  • Jacqueline de Almeida Gonçalves Sachett
  • Luciana Aparecida Freitas-de-Sousa
  • Felipe G. Grazziotin
  • Fan Hui Wen

This network of collaboration reflects active participation in advancing the understanding of venom biology and toxinology through multidisciplinary research efforts. Their work bridges molecular genetics, clinical toxinology, and immunology, contributing to the broader field of venomous animals and related public health concerns.

Best Publications

  • Snake population venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops atrox: Paedomorphism along its transamazonian dispersal and implications of geographic venom variability on snakebite management

    Juan J. Calvete;Libia Sanz;Alicia Pérez;Adolfo Borges

  • Processing of pro-tumor necrosis factor-alpha by venom metalloproteinases: a hypothesis explaining local tissue damage following snake bite.

    Ana Maria Moura-da-Silva;Gavin David Laing;Mark John Ingraham Paine;Jeremy Michael Thomas Jonathan Dennison

  • Clinical trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of Bothrops and Lachesis bites in the north eastern Amazon region of Brazil.

    Pedro Pereira de Oliveira Pardal;Suzana Medeiro Souza;Maria Rita de Cássia da Costa Monteiro;Hui Wen Fan

  • Novel insights into capillary vessel basement membrane damage by snake venom hemorrhagic metalloproteinases: A biochemical and immunohistochemical study

    Teresa Escalante;John Shannon;Ana M. Moura-da-Silva;José María Gutiérrez

  • Natterins, a new class of proteins with kininogenase activity characterized from Thalassophryne nattereri fish venom.

    G.S. Magalhães;M. Lopes-Ferreira;I.L.M. Junqueira-de-Azevedo;P.J. Spencer

  • Inflammatory pathogenesis of snake venom metalloproteinase-induced skin necrosis.

    Gavin David Laing;Patricia Bianca Clissa;Robert David Geoffrey Theakston;Ana Maria Moura-da-Silva

  • Comparison of venoms from wild and long-term captive Bothrops atrox snakes and characterization of Batroxrhagin, the predominant class PIII metalloproteinase from the venom of this species.

    L.A. Freitas-de-Sousa;D.R. Amazonas;L.F. Sousa;S.S. Sant'Anna

  • BnP1, a novel P-I metalloproteinase from Bothrops neuwiedi venom: biological effects benchmarking relatively to jararhagin, a P-III SVMP.

    C. Baldo;I. Tanjoni;I.R. León;I.F.C. Batista

  • Isolation and comparison of myotoxins isolated from venoms of different species of bothrops snakes

    A.M. Moura-da-Silva;H. Desmond;G. Laing;R.D.G. Theakston

  • Collagen-induced secretion-dependent phase of platelet aggregation is inhibited by the snake venom metalloproteinase jararhagin

    A. S. Kamiguti;A. M. Moura-Da-Silva;A. M. Moura-Da-Silva;G. D. Laing;T. Knapp

  • Evidence for heterogeneous forms of the snake venom metalloproteinase jararhagin: a factor contributing to snake venom variability.

    A.M Moura-da-Silva;M.S Della-Casa;A.S David;M.T Assakura

  • Functional variability of snake venom metalloproteinases: adaptive advantages in targeting different prey and implications for human envenomation

    Juliana L. Bernardoni;Leijiane F. Sousa;Luciana S. Wermelinger;Aline S. Lopes

  • Collagen binding is a key factor for the hemorrhagic activity of snake venom metalloproteinases.

    A.M. Moura-da-Silva;O.H.P. Ramos;C. Baldo;S. Niland

  • Transcriptome analysis of expressed sequence tags from the venom glands of the fish Thalassophryne nattereri.

    G.S. Magalhães;I.L.M. Junqueira-de-Azevedo;M. Lopes-Ferreira;D.M. Lorenzini

  • The molecular cloning of a phospholipase A2 from Bothrops jararacussu snake venom: evolution of venom group II phospholipase A2's may imply gene duplications.

    Ana M. Moura-da-Silva;Ana M. Moura-da-Silva;Mark J. I. Paine;Marcelo R. V. Diniz;R. David G. Theakston

  • Jararhagin ECD-Containing Disintegrin Domain: Expression in Escherichia coli and Inhibition of the Platelet–Collagen Interaction

    A. M. Moura-Da-Silva;A. Linica;M. S. Della-Casa;A. S. Kamiguti

  • Cloning of metalloprotease genes in the carpet viper (Echis pyramidum leakeyi). Further members of the metalloprotease/disintegrin gene family.

    Mark J. I. Paine;Ana M. Moura-Da-Silva;Ana M. Moura-Da-Silva;R. David G. Theakston;Julian M. Crampton

  • Importance of metalloproteinases and macrophages in viper snake envenomation-induced local inflammation.

    E. P. Costa;P. B. Clissa;C. F. P. Teixeira;A. M. Moura-da-Silva

  • Structural and biological characterization of Nattectin, a new C-type lectin from the venomous fish Thalassophryne nattereri

    Mônica Lopes-Ferreira;Geraldo Santana Magalhães;Jorge Hernandez Fernandez;Inácio de Loiola M. Junqueira-de-Azevedo

  • Thalassophryne nattereri fish venom: biological and biochemical characterization and serum neutralization of its toxic activities

    M Lopes-Ferreira;K.C Barbaro;D.F Cardoso;A.M Moura-Da-Silva

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. I. Paine
Mark J. I. Paine Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
José María Gutiérrez
José María Gutiérrez University of Costa Rica
H. Lisle Gibbs
H. Lisle Gibbs The Ohio State University
R.D.G. Theakston
R.D.G. Theakston Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Jay W. Fox
Jay W. Fox University of Virginia
Yamileth Angulo
Yamileth Angulo University of Costa Rica
Carol V. Robinson
Carol V. Robinson University of Oxford
Bruno Lomonte
Bruno Lomonte University of Costa Rica
Bryan G. Fry
Bryan G. Fry University of Queensland
Antonio C. Marques
Antonio C. Marques Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open the door to various advanced studies and medical professions. If you’re interested in broadening your expertise or switching to a healthcare role, there are several online degree pathways to consider in the USA. Many students wonder how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner, as the journey can vary depending on your prior education and career goals.

For registered nurses seeking to advance quickly, a 6 month rn to bsn program is a fast-track option that can enhance qualifications and open doors to leadership positions. Graduates who hold an ADN may also look into specialized bridge programs like the asn to np route, allowing for a direct path into advanced practice roles.

Even those with non-nursing backgrounds are finding accessible routes to healthcare. Direct entry msn programs for non nurses online are designed for career changers with a bachelor’s in another discipline, making a transition into nursing both efficient and achievable.

Whether you plan to build on your molecular biology background or pivot to patient care, these flexible online programs provide diverse opportunities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ana M. Moura-da-Silva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles