What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Neuroscience
- Internal medicine
- Genetics
His primary scientific interests are in Olfactory epithelium, Olfaction, Epithelium, Pathology and Neurogenesis.
He interconnects Olfactory ensheathing glia, Olfactory mucosa and Cell biology in the investigation of issues within Olfactory epithelium.
His Olfaction research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Basal, Audiology, Communication, Degeneration and Odor.
He combines subjects such as Internal medicine, Quantitative analysis, Endocrinology and Sniffing with his study of Odor.
His research investigates the connection between Epithelium and topics such as Lesion that intersect with problems in Respiratory system.
Steven L. Youngentob studied Pathology and Olfactory nerve that intersect with Anatomy, Glial cell proliferation, Reinnervation and Olfactory marker protein.
His most cited work include:
- Adult olfactory epithelium contains multipotent progenitors that give rise to neurons and non‐neural cells (261 citations)
- Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide‐induced lesion (234 citations)
- A quantitative analysis of sniffing strategies in rats performing odor detection tasks. (180 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Steven L. Youngentob mostly deals with Olfaction, Odor, Olfactory epithelium, Neuroscience and Olfactory system.
The concepts of his Olfaction study are interwoven with issues in Sensory threshold, Psychophysics, Neural coding and Communication.
His work deals with themes such as Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Nicotine, Physiology and Sniffing, which intersect with Odor.
His Olfactory epithelium research includes themes of Epithelium, Lesion, Pathology and Olfactory bulb, Olfactory ensheathing glia.
The Olfactory ensheathing glia study combines topics in areas such as Immunology and Cell biology.
His work on Sensory system as part of general Neuroscience study is frequently linked to Statistical analysis, bridging the gap between disciplines.
He most often published in these fields:
- Olfaction (57.14%)
- Odor (63.49%)
- Olfactory epithelium (30.16%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2016)?
- Odor (63.49%)
- Physiology (34.92%)
- Olfaction (57.14%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Odor, Physiology, Olfaction, Ethanol and Taste are his primary areas of study.
His Odor study incorporates themes from Internal medicine and Nicotine.
Steven L. Youngentob connects Olfaction with Behavioral response in his research.
In the field of Ethanol, his study on Ethanol abuse overlaps with subjects such as Naltrexone.
Steven L. Youngentob has researched Taste in several fields, including Alcohol, Nicotine replacement therapy, Anesthesia and Irritation.
His research integrates issues of Fetus and Endocrinology in his study of Offspring.
Between 2011 and 2016, his most popular works were:
- Gestational naltrexone ameliorates fetal ethanol exposures enhancing effect on the postnatal behavioral and neural response to ethanol (13 citations)
- Gestational naltrexone ameliorates fetal ethanol exposures enhancing effect on the postnatal behavioral and neural response to ethanol (13 citations)
- Fetal nicotine exposure increases preference for nicotine odor in early postnatal and adolescent, but not adult, rats. (10 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Neuroscience
- Internal medicine
- Biochemistry
His primary areas of study are Fetus, Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Ethanol abuse and Gestation.
The study of Fetus is intertwined with the study of Olfactory mucosa in a number of ways.
His Olfactory mucosa research incorporates elements of Stimulus, Odor, Olfactory bulb, Addiction and Nicotine.
Steven L. Youngentob frequently studies issues relating to Offspring and Nicotine.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Gestational exposure, Animal studies and Pregnancy in addition to Ethanol abuse.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
