World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
11156
World Ranking
4352
National Ranking
1971

James E. Schwob publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Schwob sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James E. Schwob D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Schwob sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Schwob is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States and specializes in neuroscience with an emphasis on sensory systems. Their research predominantly focuses on the olfactory and sensory function studies, exploring various biochemical, molecular, and cellular mechanisms underlying olfactory processes.

Their work covers key topics such as:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics

Schwob's research can be situated within multiple subfields, including sensory systems, nutrition and dietetics, molecular biology, biomedical engineering, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach combining neuroscience with biochemical and engineering perspectives.

The scientist has published extensively in several journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology
  • iScience
  • International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • Chemical Senses
  • Modern Pathology

Notable recent publications include:

  • "International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction," 2022, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • "Identifying Treatments for Taste and Smell Disorders: Gaps and Opportunities," 2020, Chemical Senses
  • "Integrated age-related immunohistological changes occur in human olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb," 2022, The Journal of Comparative Neurology
  • "Molecular Evidence for Olfactory Neuroblastoma as a Tumor of Malignant Globose Basal Cells," 2023, Modern Pathology
  • "Horizontal basal cells self-govern their neurogenic potential during injury-induced regeneration of the olfactory epithelium," 2023, Development

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Eric H. Holbrook
  • Brian Lin
  • Matthew J. Zunitch
  • Jonathan D. Louie
  • Camila M. Barrios-Camacho

Best Publications

  • Widespread patterns of neuronal damage following systemic or intracerebral injections of kainic acid: a histological study.

    J.E. Schwob;T. Fuller;J.L. Price;J.W. Olney

  • Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system

    James E. Schwob

  • Olfactory sensory neurons are trophically dependent on the olfactory bulb for their prolonged survival

    JE Schwob;KE Szumowski;AA Stasky

  • Adult olfactory epithelium contains multipotent progenitors that give rise to neurons and non‐neural cells

    Josee M.T. Huard;Steven L. Youngentob;Bradley J. Goldstein;Marla B. Luskin

  • Reconstitution of the rat olfactory epithelium after methyl bromide‐induced lesion

    James E. Schwob;Steven L. Youngentob;Renee C. Mezza

  • Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium.

    Donald A. Leopold;Thomas Hummel;James E. Schwob;Seok Chen Hong

  • The development of axonal connections in the central olfactory system of rats.

    James E. Schwob;Joseph L. Price

  • The FXG: A Presynaptic Fragile X Granule Expressed in a Subset of Developing Brain Circuits

    Sean B. Christie;Michael R. Akins;James E. Schwob;Justin R. Fallon

  • Stem and progenitor cells of the mammalian olfactory epithelium: Taking poietic license.

    James E. Schwob;Woochan Jang;Eric H. Holbrook;Brian Lin

  • Monoclonal antibodies show that kinase C phosphorylation of GAP-43 during axonogenesis is both spatially and temporally restricted in vivo.

    K F Meiri;L E Bickerstaff;J E Schwob

  • Multipotency of purified, transplanted globose basal cells in olfactory epithelium.

    Xueyan Chen;Hengsheng Fang;James E. Schwob

  • An immunochemical, ultrastructural, and developmental characterization of the horizontal basal cells of rat olfactory epithelium

    Eric H. Holbrook;Karen E. Mieleszko Szumowski;James E. Schwob;James E. Schwob

  • The aging olfactory epithelium: Neurogenesis, response to damage, and odorant-induced activity

    Alice T. Loo;Steven L. Youngentob;Paul F. Kent;James E. Schwob

  • Growth-Associated Protein-43 Is Required for Commissural Axon Guidance in the Developing Vertebrate Nervous System

    Yiping Shen;Shyamala Mani;Stacy L. Donovan;James E. Schwob

  • Neurons of the olfactory epithelium in adult rats contain vimentin

    JE Schwob;NB Farber;DI Gottlieb

  • Odorant Receptor Expression Patterns Are Restored in Lesion-Recovered Rat Olfactory Epithelium

    Carrie L. Iwema;Hengsheng Fang;Daniel B. Kurtz;Steven L. Youngentob

  • Immunohistochemical characterization of human olfactory tissue

    Eric Hans Holbrook;Enming Wu;William Thomas Curry;Derrick T. Lin

  • Monoclonal antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase.

    David I. Gottlieb;Yen-Chung Chang;James E. Schwob

  • Analysis of the Globose Basal Cell Compartment in Rat Olfactory Epithelium Using GBC-1, a New Monoclonal Antibody against Globose Basal Cells

    Bradley J. Goldstein;James E. Schwob

  • Notch3-Jagged signaling controls the pool of undifferentiated airway progenitors

    Munemasa Mori;John E. Mahoney;Maria R. Stupnikov;Jesus R. Paez-Cortez

  • Olfactory uptake of manganese requires DMT1 and is enhanced by anemia

    Khristy Thompson;Ramon M. Molina;Thomas Donaghey;James E. Schwob

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Youngentob
Steven L. Youngentob University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Joseph L. Price
Joseph L. Price Washington University in St. Louis
Matt Wachowiak
Matt Wachowiak University of Utah
Yiping Shen
Yiping Shen Boston Children's Hospital
Justin R. Fallon
Justin R. Fallon Brown University
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Steven D. Munger
Steven D. Munger University of Florida
Joel D. Mainland
Joel D. Mainland Monell Chemical Senses Center
David L. Kaplan
David L. Kaplan University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Lewis B. Haberly
Lewis B. Haberly University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James E. Schwob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles