World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
10814
World Ranking
4718
National Ranking
404

Susan C. Barnett publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan C. Barnett sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Susan C. Barnett D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan C. Barnett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan C. Barnett is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily Medicine and Neuroscience, focusing on several specialized subfields including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Developmental Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics within neuroscience and regenerative medicine. Main research themes include nerve injury and regeneration, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, mosquito-borne diseases and control, mesenchymal stem cell research, spinal cord injury research, neurogenetic and muscular disorders research, and proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research.

Recent publications showcase a breadth of studies in these areas. Some notable works are:

  • "Multi-target approaches to CNS repair: olfactory mucosa-derived cells and heparan sulfates" (2020, Nature Reviews Neurology)
  • "Oligodendrocytes are susceptible to Zika virus infection in a mouse model of perinatal exposure: Implications for CNS complications" (2021, Glia)
  • "Therapeutic Potential of Niche-Specific Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Spinal Cord Injury Repair" (2021, Cells)
  • "Zika Virus Infection Leads to Demyelination and Axonal Injury in Mature CNS Cultures" (2021, Viruses)
  • "A scoping review of trials for cell-based therapies in human spinal cord injury" (2020, Spinal Cord)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Susan C. Barnett include:

  • Susan L. Lindsay
  • Christopher Linington
  • Rebecca Sherrard Smith
  • Julia M. Edgar
  • George A. McCanney

The primary publication venues where the scientist's research appears are Glia, Nature Reviews Neurology, Cells, Viruses, and Spinal Cord, reflecting a focus on neurological sciences and biomedical exploration of central nervous system disorders and therapies.

Best Publications

  • Cooperation between two growth factors promotes extended self-renewal and inhibits differentiation of oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte (O-2A) progenitor cells.

    Oliver Bogler;Damian Wren;Susan C. Barnett;Hartmut Land

  • Induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by intramuscular immunization with plasmid DNA is facilitated by bone marrow-derived cells.

    Barbara Doe;Mark Selby;Susan Barnett;Juerg Baenziger

  • Repair of demyelinated lesions by transplantation of purified O-2A progenitor cells

    A. K. Groves;S. C. Barnett;R. J. M. Franklin;A. J. Crang

  • Schwann cell-like myelination following transplantation of an olfactory bulb-ensheathing cell line into areas of demyelination in the adult CNS.

    R.J.M. Franklin;J.M. Gilson;I.A. Franceschini;S.C. Barnett

  • Identification of a human olfactory ensheathing cell that can effect transplant-mediated remyelination of demyelinated CNS axons

    Susan C. Barnett;Claire L. Alexander;Yasushi Iwashita;Jennifer M. Gilson

  • Olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells differ in their in vitro interactions with astrocytes.

    Andras Lakatos;Robin J.M. Franklin;Susan C. Barnett

  • Low-Affinity NGF-Receptor and E-N-CAM Expression Define Two Types of Olfactory Nerve Ensheathing Cells That Share a Common Lineage

    Isabelle A. Franceschini;Susan C. Barnett

  • Olfactory ensheathing cells induce less host astrocyte response and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan expression than Schwann cells following transplantation into adult CNS white matter.

    Andras Lakatos;Susan C Barnett;Robin J.M Franklin

  • Purification of Olfactory Nerve Ensheathing Cells from the Olfactory Bulb

    Susan C. Barnett;Anne-Marie Hutchins;Mark Noble

  • The multifaceted role of astrocytes in regulating myelination.

    Hülya Kıray;Susan L. Lindsay;Sara Hosseinzadeh;Susan C. Barnett

  • Olfactory ensheathing cells and CNS regeneration: the sweet smell of success?

    Robin J.M. Franklin;Susan C. Barnett

  • Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and the treatment of CNS injury: advantages and possible caveats.

    Susan C. Barnett;John S. Riddell

  • Olfactory ensheathing cells and CNS repair: going solo or in need of a friend?

    Susan C Barnett;Lynda Chang

  • Functional identification of pathogenic autoantibody responses in patients with multiple sclerosis

    Christina Elliott;Maren Lindner;Ariel Arthur;Kathryn Brennan

  • Olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation as a strategy for spinal cord repair—what can it achieve?

    Susan C Barnett;John S Riddell

  • Do olfactory glia have advantages over Schwann cells for CNS repair

    Robin J.M. Franklin;Susan C. Barnett

  • KIBRA exhibits MST-independent functional regulation of the Hippo signaling pathway in mammals

    S Moleirinho;N Chang;A H Sims;A M Tilston-Lünel

  • Functional Duality of Astrocytes in Myelination

    Besma Nash;Christine E. Thomson;Christopher Linington;Ariel T. Arthur

  • FGF/heparin differentially regulates Schwann cell and olfactory ensheathing cell interactions with astrocytes: a role in astrocytosis.

    Alessandra Santos-Silva;Richard Fairless;Margaret C Frame;Paul Montague

  • Identification of Nonepithelial Multipotent Cells in the Embryonic Olfactory Mucosa

    Mercedes Tomé;Susan L. Lindsay;John S. Riddell;Susan C. Barnett

  • Identification of growth factors that promote long-term proliferation of olfactory ensheathing cells and modulate their antigenic phenotype.

    Claire L. Alexander;U. N. A. F. Fitzgerald;Susan C. Barnett

  • N-cadherin differentially determines Schwann cell and olfactory ensheathing cell adhesion and migration responses upon contact with astrocytes

    Richard Fairless;Margaret C. Frame;Susan C. Barnett

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin J.M. Franklin
Robin J.M. Franklin University of Cambridge
Hugh J. Willison
Hugh J. Willison University of Glasgow
John S. Riddell
John S. Riddell University of Glasgow
Christopher Linington
Christopher Linington University of Glasgow
Mathis O. Riehle
Mathis O. Riehle University of Glasgow
Mark Noble
Mark Noble University of Rochester
Alain Kohl
Alain Kohl University of Glasgow
Hans Lassmann
Hans Lassmann Medical University of Vienna
Edgar Meinl
Edgar Meinl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Nikolaj Gadegaard
Nikolaj Gadegaard University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and professional pathways, many of which complement or expand your knowledge of the brain and behavior. If you’re considering a multidisciplinary approach, a bachelor of psychology online can provide a foundational understanding of mental processes, ideal for those interested in both theory and applied work.

For those leaning toward social or clinical impact, an online msw program can lead to a fulfilling career in social work, supporting individuals and communities with evidence-based interventions. If advanced clinical practice is your goal, pursuing one of the top online psyd clinical psychology programs will prepare you for licensure and a career as a clinical psychologist, combining neuroscience insights with mental healthcare.

Interested in therapy with a focus on relationships? Accredited lmft programs offer a path to becoming a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, allowing you to apply your neuroscience background to real-world counseling situations. Each pathway has its own prerequisites, flexibility, and outcomes, making it important to research which best fits your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Susan C. Barnett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles