World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
3936
World Ranking
9538
National Ranking
707

John S. Riddell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Riddell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John S. Riddell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Riddell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John S. Riddell is a researcher affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant contribution to subfields including physiology, epidemiology, dermatology, rheumatology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research topics cover a range of areas related to bone health, skin diseases, pain mechanisms, and spinal cord injury. These include:

  • Bone fractures and treatments
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Riddell has published extensively in a variety of scientific venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Experimental Neurology
  • Pain
  • Bone Reports

Among the recent publications authored by Riddell are:

  • "Refining rodent models of spinal cord injury," 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • "Grpr expression defines a population of superficial dorsal horn vertical cells that have a role in both itch and pain," 2022, Pain
  • "Neuropeptide Y-expressing dorsal horn inhibitory interneurons gate spinal pain and itch signalling," 2023, eLife
  • "Spatiotemporal responses of trabecular and cortical bone to complete spinal cord injury in skeletally mature rats," 2022, Bone Reports
  • "Time course changes to structural, mechanical and material properties of bone in rats after complete spinal cord injury," 2022, PubMed

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated on multiple projects with Riddell include:

  • Jonathan A. Williams
  • James F. C. Windmill
  • S. Coupaud
  • Carmen Huesa
  • Erika Polgár

Best Publications

  • Populations of inhibitory and excitatory interneurons in lamina II of the adult rat spinal dorsal horn revealed by a combined electrophysiological and anatomical approach.

    Toshiharu Yasaka;Sheena Y.X. Tiong;David I. Hughes;John S. Riddell

  • Selective loss of spinal GABAergic or glycinergic neurons is not necessary for development of thermal hyperalgesia in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain

    Erika Polgár;D.I. Hughes;J.S. Riddell;D.J. Maxwell

  • Circuit dissection of the role of somatostatin in itch and pain.

    Jing Huang;Jing Huang;Erika Polgár;Hans Jürgen Solinski;Santosh K. Mishra;Santosh K. Mishra

  • Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and the treatment of CNS injury: advantages and possible caveats.

    Susan C. Barnett;John S. Riddell

  • Lack of evidence for significant neuronal loss in laminae I–III of the spinal dorsal horn of the rat in the chronic constriction injury model

    Erika Polgár;S Gray;JS Riddell;AJ Todd

  • Lack of Evidence for Sprouting of Aβ Afferents into the Superficial Laminas of the Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn after Nerve Section

    David I. Hughes;Dugald T. Scott;Andrew J. Todd;John S. Riddell

  • Olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation as a strategy for spinal cord repair—what can it achieve?

    Susan C Barnett;John S Riddell

  • FGF/heparin differentially regulates Schwann cell and olfactory ensheathing cell interactions with astrocytes: a role in astrocytosis.

    Alessandra Santos-Silva;Richard Fairless;Margaret C Frame;Paul Montague

  • Identification of Nonepithelial Multipotent Cells in the Embryonic Olfactory Mucosa

    Mercedes Tomé;Susan L. Lindsay;John S. Riddell;Susan C. Barnett

  • Olfactory ensheathing cell grafts have minimal influence on regeneration at the dorsal root entry zone following rhizotomy.

    John S. Riddell;Manuel Enriquez-Denton;Andrew Toft;Richard Fairless

  • Electrophysiological evidence that olfactory cell transplants improve function after spinal cord injury

    Andrew Toft;Dugald T. Scott;Susan C. Barnett;John S. Riddell

  • Olfactory mucosa for transplant-mediated repair: a complex tissue for a complex injury?

    Susan L. Lindsay;John S. Riddell;Susan C. Barnett

  • P boutons in lamina IX of the rodent spinal cord express high levels of glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 and originate from cells in deep medial dorsal horn

    Hughes Di;Mackie M;Nagy Gg;Riddell Js

  • Refining rodent models of spinal cord injury

    Elliot Lilley;Melissa R. Andrews;Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Heather Elliott

  • Interneurones mediating presynaptic inhibition of group II muscle afferents in the cat spinal cord.

    E Jankowska;J S Riddell

  • A putative relay circuit providing low-threshold mechanoreceptive input to lamina I projection neurons via vertical cells in lamina II of the rat dorsal horn

    Toshiharu Yasaka;Toshiharu Yasaka;Sheena Y.X. Tiong;Erika Polgár;Masahiko Watanabe

  • Depolarization of group II muscle afferents by stimuli applied in the locus coeruleus and raphe nuclei of the cat.

    J S Riddell;E Jankowska;E Eide

  • Organization of neuronal systems mediating presynaptic inhibition of group II muscle afferents in the cat.

    J S Riddell;E Jankowska;J Huber

  • Morphological and functional properties distinguish the substance P and gastrin-releasing peptide subsets of excitatory interneuron in the spinal cord dorsal horn.

    Allen C. Dickie;Andrew M. Bell;Noboru Iwagaki;Erika Polgár

  • Gating of transmission to motoneurones by stimuli applied in the locus coeruleus and raphe nuclei of the cat.

    E Jankowska;J S Riddell;B Skoog;B R Noga

  • The developing landscape of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for spinal cord injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood.

    Hulme Ch;Brown Sj;Fuller Hr;Riddell J

  • Axoaxonic synapses on terminals of group II muscle spindle afferent axons in the spinal cord of the cat.

    D. J. Maxwell;J. S. Riddell

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Todd
Andrew J. Todd University of Glasgow
Susan C. Barnett
Susan C. Barnett University of Glasgow
Elzbieta Jankowska
Elzbieta Jankowska University of Gothenburg
Erika Polgár
Erika Polgár University of Glasgow
Masahiko Watanabe
Masahiko Watanabe Hokkaido University
David J. Maxwell
David J. Maxwell University of Glasgow
Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer
Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer University of Zurich
George M. Smith
George M. Smith Temple University
Mathis O. Riehle
Mathis O. Riehle University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience can be rewarding, but many students also consider online certificate programs that pay well as alternative or complementary pathways. These certificates can help you gain valuable skills quickly while boosting your earning potential in related healthcare or research roles.

For those seeking flexibility, some of the easy bachelor degrees online may serve as useful stepping stones to neuroscience or related fields. These programs can provide foundational knowledge in science or psychology, making it easier to transition into more specialized neuroscience studies later.

If you’re interested in mental health or social work alongside neuroscience, consider pursuing the cheapest online msw programs. These affordable degrees can open doors to counseling, therapy, and case management careers—many of which benefit from neuroscience expertise.

Those looking for a specialized certification should also explore an accelerated bcba program online. Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credentials are highly valued in both clinical and educational settings, and these fast-track, cost-effective programs can help jumpstart your career.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Riddell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles