World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
121
Citations
51547
World Ranking
377
National Ranking
49

James W. Fawcett publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 383 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James W. Fawcett D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James W. Fawcett is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has made contributions primarily in the fields of neuroscience, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and medicine. Their research focuses notably on cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cell biology, developmental neuroscience, and pathology and forensic medicine.

They have published extensively on topics related to nerve injury and regeneration, proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, signaling pathways in disease, spinal cord injury research, neuropeptides and animal physiology, and RNA interference and gene delivery.

Recent scientific papers authored or co-authored by James W. Fawcett include:

  • "Microglia-mediated degradation of perineuronal nets promotes pain" (2022), published in Science
  • "The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory" (2022), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Optimization of adeno-associated viral vector-mediated transduction of the corticospinal tract: comparison of four promoters" (2020), published in Gene Therapy
  • "Protrudin functions from the endoplasmic reticulum to support axon regeneration in the adult CNS" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Chondroitin 6-sulphate is required for neuroplasticity and memory in ageing" (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James W. Fawcett include:

  • Jessica C. F. Kwok
  • Pavla Jendelová
  • Joost Verhaagen
  • Lucia Machová Urdzíková
  • Bart Nieuwenhuis

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Gene Therapy
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Their work explores complex cellular mechanisms underlying nerve injury, regeneration, and neuroplasticity, examining the role of extracellular matrix components such as perineuronal nets. Investigations into signaling pathways provide insights into disease processes and potential therapeutic strategies.

Best Publications

  • Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Lawrence D. F. Moon;Lawrence D. F. Moon;Reena J. Popat;Von R. King

  • The glial scar and central nervous system repair

    James W Fawcett;Richard.A Asher

  • Reactivation of Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Adult Visual Cortex

    Tommaso Pizzorusso;Paolo Medini;Nicoletta Berardi;Sabrina Chierzi

  • Regressive events in neurogenesis

    WM Cowan;JW Fawcett;DD O'Leary;BB Stanfield

  • Peripheral nerve regeneration

    James W. Fawcett;Roger J. Keynes

  • The oligodendrocyte precursor cell in health and disease

    Joel M Levine;Richard Reynolds;James W Fawcett

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials

    J W Fawcett;A Curt;J D Steeves;W P Coleman

  • Regeneration of CNS axons back to their target following treatment of adult rat brain with chondroitinase ABC.

    Lawrence D. F. Moon;Richard A. Asher;Kate E. Rhodes;James W. Fawcett

  • The role of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in regeneration and plasticity in the central nervous system.

    Clare M. Galtrey;James W. Fawcett

  • Neurocan is upregulated in injured brain and in cytokine-treated astrocytes.

    Richard A. Asher;Daniel A. Morgenstern;Penny S. Fidler;Kathryn H. Adcock

  • The roles of perineuronal nets and the perinodal extracellular matrix in neuronal function

    James W. Fawcett;Toshitaka Oohashi;Tommaso Pizzorusso

  • Animals lacking link protein have attenuated perineuronal nets and persistent plasticity

    Daniela Carulli;Tommaso Pizzorusso;Jessica C. F. Kwok;Elena Putignano

  • Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans in the CNS injury response.

    Daniel A Morgenstern;Richard A Asher;James W Fawcett

  • Assembly of a new growth cone after axotomy: the precursor to axon regeneration

    Frank Bradke;James W. Fawcett;Micha E. Spira

  • Can experiments in nonhuman primates expedite the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans

    Grégoire Courtine;Mary Bartlett Bunge;James W Fawcett;Robert G Grossman

  • Chondroitinase ABC treatment opens a window of opportunity for task-specific rehabilitation.

    Guillermo García-Alías;Stanley Barkhuysen;Miranda Buckle;James W Fawcett

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures

    J. D. Steeves;D. Lammertse;A. Curt;J. W. Fawcett

  • The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite.

    M. Rickmann;J. W. Fawcett;R. J. Keynes

  • Axonal Protein Synthesis and Degradation Are Necessary for Efficient Growth Cone Regeneration

    Poonam Verma;Sabrina Chierzi;Amanda M. Codd;Douglas Simon Campbell

  • The perineuronal net and the control of CNS plasticity

    Difei Wang;James Fawcett

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen B. Dunnett
Stephen B. Dunnett Cardiff University
Stéphanie P. Lacour
Stéphanie P. Lacour École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Joost Verhaagen
Joost Verhaagen Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
Stephen B. McMahon
Stephen B. McMahon King's College London
Charles ffrench-Constant
Charles ffrench-Constant University of Edinburgh
Herbert M. Geller
Herbert M. Geller National Institutes of Health
John D. Steeves
John D. Steeves University of British Columbia
Mark H. Tuszynski
Mark H. Tuszynski University of California, San Diego
Elizabeth J. Bradbury
Elizabeth J. Bradbury King's College London
Andreas Faissner
Andreas Faissner Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James W. Fawcett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles