World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elizabeth J. Bradbury

Elizabeth J. Bradbury

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
13312
World Ranking
5654
National Ranking
455

Elizabeth J. Bradbury publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Bradbury sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Elizabeth J. Bradbury D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Bradbury sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth J. Bradbury is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research centers primarily on spinal cord injury, with significant contributions to the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience. Their work spans subfields including pathology and forensic medicine, cellular and molecular neuroscience, genetics, molecular biology, and surgery.

Bradbury's research topics include spinal cord injury research, nerve injury and regeneration, RNA interference and gene delivery, nerve injury and rehabilitation, virus-based gene therapy research, human-animal interaction studies, and animal testing and alternatives.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Refining rodent models of spinal cord injury, 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans prevent immune cell phenotypic conversion and inflammation resolution via TLR4 in rodent models of spinal cord injury, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Combined treatment with enteric neural stem cells and chondroitinase ABC reduces spinal cord lesion pathology, 2021, Stem Cell Research & Therapy
  • Secretion of a mammalian chondroitinase ABC aids glial integration at PNS/CNS boundaries, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Managing healthcare worker well-being in an Australian emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Emergency Medicine Australasia

Frequent coauthors in their work include Fred de Winter, Joost Verhaagen, Emily R. Burnside, Isaac Francos-Quijorna, and Melissa R. Andrews.

The main venues where their research has been published are:

  • Experimental Neurology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Communications
  • Stem Cell Research & Therapy
  • Emergency Medicine Australasia

Best Publications

  • Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Lawrence D. F. Moon;Lawrence D. F. Moon;Reena J. Popat;Von R. King

  • Moving beyond the glial scar for spinal cord repair.

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Emily R. Burnside

  • The expression of P2X3 purinoreceptors in sensory neurons: effects of axotomy and glial-derived neurotrophic factor.

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Geoffery Burnstock;Stephen B. McMahon

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulates nociceptive sensory inputs and NMDA-evoked responses in the rat spinal cord.

    B J Kerr;Elizabeth Bradbury;D L Bennett;P M Trivedi

  • Chondroitinase ABC Promotes Sprouting of Intact and Injured Spinal Systems after Spinal Cord Injury

    AW Barritt;M Davies;F Marchand;R Hartley

  • Spinal cord repair strategies: why do they work?

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Stephen B. McMahon

  • The soft mechanical signature of glial scars in the central nervous system.

    Emad Moeendarbary;Emad Moeendarbary;Emad Moeendarbary;Isabell P. Weber;Graham K. Sheridan;Graham K. Sheridan;David E. Koser

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is an endogenous modulator of nociceptive responses in the spinal cord

    S. W. N. Thompson;D. L. H. Bennett;B. J. Kerr;E. J. Bradbury

  • Restoring function after spinal cord injury: towards clinical translation of experimental strategies

    Leanne M Ramer;Leanne M Ramer;Matt S Ramer;Matt S Ramer;Matt S Ramer;Elizabeth J Bradbury

  • Manipulating the glial scar: Chondroitinase ABC as a therapy for spinal cord injury

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Lucy M. Carter

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is released in the dorsal horn by distinctive patterns of afferent fiber stimulation

    Isobel J. Lever;Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Joanna R. Cunningham;David W. Adelson

  • Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Expression in Rat Spinal Cord

    W P Farquhar-Smith;M Egertova;Elizabeth Bradbury;Stephen McMahon

  • NT‐3 promotes growth of lesioned adult rat sensory axons ascending in the dorsal columns of the spinal cord

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Sameer Khemani;Von R;King

  • Role of spinal microglia in rat models of peripheral nerve injury and inflammation

    Anna K. Clark;Clive Gentry;Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Stephen B. McMahon

  • Nerve growth factor induces P2X(3) expression in sensory neurons.

    Matt S. Ramer;Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Stephen B. McMahon

  • Large-scale chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan digestion with chondroitinase gene therapy leads to reduced pathology and modulates macrophage phenotype following spinal cord contusion injury.

    Katalin Bartus;Nicholas D. James;Athanasios Didangelos;Karen D. Bosch

  • Assessing behavioural function following a pyramidotomy lesion of the corticospinal tract in adult mice

    Michelle L. Starkey;Andrew W. Barritt;Ping K. Yip;Meirion Davies

  • Effects of Etanercept and Minocycline in a rat model of spinal cord injury

    Fabien Marchand;Christoforos Tsantoulas;Dalbinder Singh;John Grist

  • Manipulating the extracellular matrix and its role in brain and spinal cord plasticity and repair.

    E R Burnside;Elizabeth J Bradbury

  • Progress in spinal cord research - A refined strategy for the International Spinal Research Trust

    M S Ramer;G P Harper;Elizabeth Bradbury

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen B. McMahon
Stephen B. McMahon King's College London
James W. Fawcett
James W. Fawcett University of Cambridge
Matt S. Ramer
Matt S. Ramer University of British Columbia
Joost Verhaagen
Joost Verhaagen Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
Ping K. Yip
Ping K. Yip Queen Mary University of London
John Grist
John Grist King's College London
Marzia Malcangio
Marzia Malcangio King's College London
David L.H. Bennett
David L.H. Bennett University of Oxford
John V. Priestley
John V. Priestley Queen Mary University of London
Bart Vanhaesebroeck
Bart Vanhaesebroeck University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Bradbury

Trending Scientists