World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
17055
World Ranking
2225
National Ranking
224

John V. Priestley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John V. Priestley sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 189 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John V. Priestley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John V. Priestley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John V. Priestley is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the broader field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with specific contributions across several subfields including Physiology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Developmental Biology, and Ecology.

Their work covers a range of topics, notably Diet and Metabolism Studies, Metabolism and Genetic Disorders, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, Marine Animal Studies Overview, and Animal Behavior and Reproduction.

Recent published papers by Priestley include:

  • A new ketogenic formulation improves functional outcome and reduces tissue loss following traumatic brain injury in adult mice (2020, Theranostics)
  • Serotonin Expression in the Song Circuitry of Adult Male Zebra Finches (2020, Neuroscience)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Priestley are:

  • Adina T. Michael-Titus
  • Orli Thau-Zuchman
  • Linda Svendsen
  • Simon C. Dyall
  • Ursula Paredes-Esquivel

Priestley has contributed publications in the venues Thermanostics and Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Mutations in Dynein Link Motor Neuron Degeneration to Defects in Retrograde Transport

    Majid Hafezparast;Rainer Klocke;Christiana Ruhrberg;Andreas Marquardt

  • Immunocytochemical localization of trkA receptors in chemically identified subgroups of adult rat sensory neurons.

    S. Averill;S. B. McMahon;D. O. Clary;L. F. Reichardt

  • A Distinct Subgroup of Small DRG Cells Express GDNF Receptor Components and GDNF Is Protective for These Neurons after Nerve Injury

    David L. H. Bennett;Gregory J. Michael;Navin Ramachandran;John B. Munson

  • Differential Expression of the mRNA for the Vanilloid Receptor Subtype 1 in Cells of the Adult Rat Dorsal Root and Nodose Ganglia and Its Downregulation by Axotomy

    Gregory J. Michael;John V. Priestley

  • Nerve Growth Factor Treatment Increases Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Selectively in TrkA-Expressing Dorsal Root Ganglion Cells and in Their Central Terminations within the Spinal Cord

    G. J. Michael;S. Averill;A. Nitkunan;M. Rattray

  • Functional regeneration of sensory axons into the adult spinal cord

    Matt S. Ramer;John V. Priestley;Stephen B. McMahon

  • The biological effects of endogenous nerve growth factor on adult sensory neurons revealed by a trkA-IgG fusion molecule

    Stephen B. Mcmahon;David L.H. Bennett;John V. Priestley;David L. Shelton

  • Targeted disruption of the galanin gene reduces the number of sensory neurons and their regenerative capacity

    Fiona E. Holmes;Sally Mahoney;Von R. King;Andrea Bacon

  • Cholinergic projections from the midbrain and pons to the thalamus in the rat, identified by combined retrograde tracing and choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry

    Unknown

  • NT‐3 promotes growth of lesioned adult rat sensory axons ascending in the dorsal columns of the spinal cord

    Elizabeth J. Bradbury;Sameer Khemani;Von R;King

  • Axotomy results in major changes in BDNF expression by dorsal root ganglion cells : BDNF expression in large trkB and trkC cells, in pericellular baskets, and in projections to deep dorsal horn and dorsal column nuclei

    G. J. Michael;S. Averill;P. J. Shortland;Q. Yan

  • Omega-3 Fatty Acids Improve Recovery, whereas Omega-6 Fatty Acids Worsen Outcome, after Spinal Cord Injury in the Adult Rat

    Von R King;Wenlong L Huang;Simon C Dyall;Olimpia E Curran

  • Regulation of nociceptive neurons by nerve growth factor and glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor.

    J V Priestley;G J Michael;S Averill;M Liu

  • The glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor components are differentially regulated within sensory neurons after nerve injury.

    David L. H. Bennett;Timothy J. Boucher;Mark P. Armanini;Kris T. Poulsen

  • trkA, CGRP and IB4 expression in retrogradely labelled cutaneous and visceral primary sensory neurones in the rat

    David L.H. Bennett;Natalia Dmietrieva;John V. Priestley;Douglas Clary

  • Aberrant neurofilament phosphorylation in sensory neurons of rats with diabetic neuropathy

    Paul Fernyhough;Alex Gallagher;Sharon A. Averill;John V. Priestley

  • Postnatal Changes in the Expression of the trkA High‐affinity NGF Receptor in Primary Sensory Neurons

    D. L. H. Bennett;S. Averill;D. O. Clary;J. V. Priestley

  • A combination of intravenous and dietary docosahexaenoic acid significantly improves outcome after spinal cord injury.

    W. L. Huang;V. R. King;O. E. Curran;S. C. Dyall

  • Endogenous nerve growth factor regulates the sensitivity of nociceptors in the adult rat

    David L. H. Bennett;Martin Koltzenburg;John V. Priestley;David L. Shelton

  • Inputs to motoneurones in the hypoglossal nucleus of the rat: light and electron microscopic immunocytochemistry for choline acetyltransferase, substance P and enkephalins using monoclonal antibodies.

    M. Connaughton;J.V. Priestley;M.V. Sofroniew;F. Eckenstein

  • Synaptic connections of enkephalin-immunoreactive nerve terminals in the neostriatum: a correlated light and electron microscopic study

    P. Somogyi;P. Somogyi;J. V. Priestley;A. C. Cuello;A. D. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen B. McMahon
Stephen B. McMahon King's College London
Ping K. Yip
Ping K. Yip Queen Mary University of London
David L.H. Bennett
David L.H. Bennett University of Oxford
Matt S. Ramer
Matt S. Ramer University of British Columbia
Paul Fernyhough
Paul Fernyhough University of Manitoba
Francisco J. Alvarez
Francisco J. Alvarez Emory University
Elizabeth J. Bradbury
Elizabeth J. Bradbury King's College London
David R. Tomlinson
David R. Tomlinson University of Manchester
Clive P. Page
Clive P. Page King's College London
Martin Koltzenburg
Martin Koltzenburg University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, there are several educational routes to think about. Today’s students can take advantage of accelerated programs to complete their degrees faster—helping you enter the workforce or pursue graduate studies sooner.

Neuroscience majors often enjoy strong earning potential, especially when they combine their background with skills in data science, healthcare, or technology. If maximizing your salary is a priority, it’s worth researching the highest paying bachelor degrees and related fields. You may also want to explore some of the best degrees to make money—fields like computer science, engineering, or business intersect well with neuroscience for unique, high-demand career paths.

Many affordable educational options are available online. For those concerned about cost and financial aid, finding an online college that accepts fafsa can help make your neuroscience journey more financially accessible.

Best Scientists Citing John V. Priestley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles