World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
16354
World Ranking
3104
National Ranking
1448

Lorne M. Mendell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorne M. Mendell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lorne M. Mendell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorne M. Mendell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorne M. Mendell is a researcher affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields within medicine, with a focus on physiology, pharmacology, and neurology. This interdisciplinary approach positions them at the intersection of several subfields engaged in understanding complex biological and neurological processes.

Their main research topics include pain mechanisms and treatments, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, as well as botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders. These areas reflect ongoing investigations into both the fundamental science of pain and its clinical applications.

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Among their scholarly contributions is the paper titled The Path to Discovery of Windup and Central Sensitization, published in 2022 within the journal Frontiers in Pain Research. This article addresses critical topics related to central sensitization, a phenomenon important to understanding chronic pain states.

  • The Path to Discovery of Windup and Central Sensitization (2022, Frontiers in Pain Research)

This publication venue also represents the primary platform where Mendell has shared their research findings. The single publication in Frontiers in Pain Research aligns with their thematic focus on pain-related mechanisms and treatments.

  • Frontiers in Pain Research

The researcher's record indicates a concentration on interdisciplinary medical sciences, with three publications categorized under medicine. These publications include studies in physiology, pharmacology, and neurology, allowing for integration across biological sciences that contribute to a comprehensive understanding of pain and neurological disorders.

  • Medicine

  • Physiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Neurology

There are no listed frequent co-authors, indicating that their research may be conducted either independently or in collaboration with varied partners not recurring frequently in scholarly publications. No awards have been recorded in the available data, and there is no indication that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • Physiological Properties of Unmyelinated Fiber Projection to the Spinal Cord

    Lorne M. Mendell

  • Functional Organization of Motoneuron Pool and its Inputs

    Elwood Henneman;Lorne M. Mendell

  • Responses of Single Dorsal Cord Cells to Peripheral Cutaneous Unmyelinated Fibres

    Lorne M. Mendell;Patrick D. Wall

  • Nerve growth factor-induced hyperalgesia in the neonatal and adult rat

    Gary R. Lewin;Amy M. Ritter;Lorne M. Mendell

  • Nerve growth factor and nociception

    Gary R. Lewin;Lorne M. Mendell

  • Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of NGF‐induced Hyperalgesia

    Gary R. Lewin;Alain Rueff;Lorne M. Mendell

  • Terminals of single Ia fibers: location, density, and distribution within a pool of 300 homonymous motoneurons.

    L M Mendell;E Henneman

  • Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain.

    Lorne M. Mendell

  • Antagonism of Nerve Growth Factor-TrkA Signaling and the Relief of Pain

    Patrick W. Mantyh;Martin Koltzenburg;Lorne M. Mendell;Leslie Tive

  • Nerve growth factor acutely sensitizes the response of adult rat sensory neurons to capsaicin.

    Xiaoquan Shu;Lorne M Mendell

  • Modifiability of spinal synapses.

    L M Mendell

  • Neurotrophins and hyperalgesia.

    X.-Q. Shu;L. M. Mendell

  • Presynaptic hyperpolarization: a role for fine afferent fibres

    L. M. Mendell;P. D. Wall

  • The size principle: a rule describing the recruitment of motoneurons

    Lorne M. Mendell

  • Neurotrophins, nociceptors, and pain.

    Lorne M. Mendell;Kathryn M. Albers;Brian M. Davis

  • Somal membrane properties of physiologically identified sensory neurons in the rat: effects of nerve growth factor.

    A. M. Ritter;L. M. Mendell

  • Quantitative ultrastructure of Ia boutons in the ventral horn: scaling and positional relationships

    Joseph P. Pierce;Lorne M. Mendell

  • Heterogeneity of group Ia synapses on homonymous alpha-motoneurons as revealed by high-frequency stimulation of Ia afferent fibers

    W. F. Collins;Marcia Honig;L. M. Mendell

  • Properties of somata of spinal dorsal root ganglion cells differ according to peripheral receptor innervated

    H. R. Koerber;R. E. Druzinsky;L. M. Mendell

  • On the role of nerve growth factor in the development of myelinated nociceptors.

    GR Lewin;AM Ritter;LM Mendell

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary R. Lewin
Gary R. Lewin Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Brian M. Davis
Brian M. Davis University of Pittsburgh
Fred H. Gage
Fred H. Gage Salk Institute for Biological Studies
James W. Fawcett
James W. Fawcett University of Cambridge
Joel M. Levine
Joel M. Levine Stony Brook University
John B. Munson
John B. Munson University of Florida
William J. Bowers
William J. Bowers University of Rochester
Lisa Schnell
Lisa Schnell University of Zurich
Howard J. Federoff
Howard J. Federoff University of California, Irvine
Philip J. Horner
Philip J. Horner Houston Methodist

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience? There are a variety of highest paying jobs available for individuals with backgrounds in science, technology, and healthcare. Neuroscience graduates are often well-positioned for roles in research, pharmaceuticals, and clinical settings—fields that offer strong earning potential.

For those seeking flexibility or looking to complement their neuroscience education, there are many online certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can boost your resume and open doors to specialized tech or health-related roles with competitive salaries.

If affordability is a priority, explore fafsa-approved online certificate programs. These allow you to advance your education and skills while utilizing federal financial aid, making them accessible for many students.

Worried about the difficulty? There are also options for what is the easiest degree to get online. These programs can provide a stepping stone towards a neuroscience career or help you build foundational academic experience before pursuing more advanced study.

Best Scientists Citing Lorne M. Mendell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles