World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
22299
World Ranking
13357
National Ranking
1244

Neuroscience

D-Index
88
Citations
22299
World Ranking
1223
National Ranking
133

Maria Fitzgerald publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 276 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maria Fitzgerald D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Fitzgerald is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pharmacy.

The main topics of Maria Fitzgerald's work include:

  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research
  • Infant Health and Development
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maria Fitzgerald are:

  • Lorenzo Fabrizi
  • Judith Meek
  • Mohammed Rupawala
  • Laura Jones
  • Maria Pureza Laudiano-Dray

Their recent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Pain
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Current Biology

Selected recent papers by Maria Fitzgerald include:

  • "Spinal interleukin-6 contributes to central sensitisation and persistent pain hypersensitivity in a model of juvenile idiopathic arthritis" (2020, Brain Behavior and Immunity)
  • "A developmental shift in habituation to pain in human neonates" (2023, Current Biology)
  • "Early Life Pain Experience Changes Adult Functional Pain Connectivity in the Rat Somatosensory and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex" (2022, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "Widespread nociceptive maps in the human neonatal somatosensory cortex" (2022, eLife)
  • "Clinical thresholds in pain-related facial activity linked to differences in cortical network activation in neonates" (2022, Pain)

Best Publications

  • The development of nociceptive circuits

    Maria Fitzgerald

  • Capsaicin and sensory neurones--a review.

    Maria Fitzgerald

  • Cortical Pain Responses in Human Infants

    Rebeccah Slater;Anne Cantarella;Shiromi Gallella;Alan Worley

  • Cutaneous hypersensitivity following peripheral tissue damage in newborn infants and its reversal with topical anaesthesia

    Maria Fitzgerald;Catherine Millard;Neil McIntosh

  • T-cell infiltration and signaling in the adult dorsal spinal cord is a major contributor to neuropathic pain-like hypersensitivity.

    Michael Costigan;Andrew Moss;Andrew Moss;Alban Latremoliere;Caroline Johnston;Caroline Johnston

  • Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial

    Rebeccah Slater;Rebeccah Slater;Laura Cornelissen;Lorenzo Fabrizi;Debbie Patten

  • The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation

    Katharine Andrews;Maria Fitzgerald

  • The neurobiology of pain: developmental aspects.

    Maria Fitzgerald;Simon Beggs

  • Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosensory perception in children born extremely preterm

    Suellen M. Walker;Linda S. Franck;Maria Fitzgerald;Jonathan Myles

  • Postnatal development of the cutaneous flexor reflex: comparative study of preterm infants and newborn rat pups

    M Fitzgerald;A Shaw;N MacIntosh

  • The functional development of descending inhibitory pathways in the dorsolateral funiculus of the newborn rat spinal cord

    Maria Fitzgerald;Martin Koltzenburg

  • Infant pain management: a developmental neurobiological approach

    Maria Fitzgerald;Suellen M Walker

  • Nerve growth factor counteracts the neurophysiological and neurochemical effects of chronic sciatic nerve section

    M. Fitzgerald;P.D. Wall;M. Goedert;P.C. Emson

  • The consequences of pain in early life: injury-induced plasticity in developing pain pathways

    Fred Schwaller;Maria Fitzgerald

  • A Shift in Sensory Processing that Enables the Developing Human Brain to Discriminate Touch from Pain

    Lorenzo Fabrizi;Rebeccah Slater;Rebeccah Slater;Alan Worley;Judith Meek

  • How Well Do Clinical Pain Assessment Tools Reflect Pain in Infants

    Rebeccah Slater;Anne Cantarella;Linda Franck;Judith Meek

  • The post-natal development of cutaneous afferent fibre input and receptive field organization in the rat dorsal horn.

    M Fitzgerald

  • Long-term sensory hyperinnervation following neonatal skin wounds

    M. L. Reynolds;M. Fitzgerald

  • The postnatal physiological and neurochemical development of peripheral sensory C fibres.

    M. Fitzgerald;M. Fitzgerald;S. Gibson;S. Gibson

  • Premature infants display increased noxious-evoked neuronal activity in the brain compared to healthy age-matched term-born infants.

    Rebeccah Slater;Lorenzo Fabrizi;Alan Worley;Judith Meek

  • The sensitization of high threshold mechanoreceptors with myelinated axons by repeated heating.

    M Fitzgerald;B Lynn

Frequent Co-Authors

Clifford J. Woolf
Clifford J. Woolf Boston Children's Hospital
Stewart Boyd
Stewart Boyd Great Ormond Street Hospital
Simon Beggs
Simon Beggs University of Toronto
Patrick D. Wall
Patrick D. Wall University College London
Richard E. Coggeshall
Richard E. Coggeshall The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Anthony H. Dickenson
Anthony H. Dickenson University College London
Michael Costigan
Michael Costigan Boston Children's Hospital
Michael W. Salter
Michael W. Salter University of Toronto
Martin Koltzenburg
Martin Koltzenburg University College London
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Maria Fitzgerald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles