World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
9612
World Ranking
7875
National Ranking
3403

Lawrence O'Gorman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence O'Gorman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lawrence O'Gorman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence O'Gorman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - IEEE Fellow For developments in the arears of pattern recognition and document analysis for technology transfer of these into industrial and commercial systems.
  • 1996 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to document analysis

Overview

Lawrence O'Gorman is affiliated with Nokia in the United States with a research focus primarily within the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their work has contributed to several subfields, including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their research topics cover a range of areas such as Human Pose and Action Recognition, Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications, Machine Learning and Data Classification, Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods, Gait Recognition and Analysis, Advanced Neural Network Applications, and Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection.

Frequent collaborators of Lawrence O'Gorman include Bryan Bo Cao, Michael Coss, Shubham Jain, Mariofanna Milanova, and Xinyi Liu.

The scholar's recent publication venues highlight a focus on peer-reviewed preprint servers and specialist journals, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Robotics & Automation Journal

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Lawrence O'Gorman encompass various topics related to video processing and human-robot interaction. These works include:

  • "Efficient Multi-Band Temporal Video Filter for Reducing Human-Robot Interaction," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "How can humans and robots communicate better?", 2020, International Robotics & Automation Journal

Other related publications from close collaborators also reflect the thematic scope of their research community, although not directly authored by O'Gorman.

Lawrence O'Gorman has been recognized within professional organizations through awards such as the IEEE Fellow in 1997, awarded for developments in pattern recognition and document analysis focusing on technology transfer into industrial and commercial systems. They were also named a Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) in 1996 for contributions to document analysis.

Best Publications

  • Comparing passwords, tokens, and biometrics for user authentication

    L. O'Gorman

  • The document spectrum for page layout analysis

    L. O'Gorman

  • Electronic marking and identification techniques to discourage document copying

    J.T. Brassil;S. Low;N.F. Maxemchuk;L. O'Gorman

  • Document Image Analysis

    Lawrence O'Gorman;Rangachar Kasturi

  • An approach to fingerprint filter design

    Lawrence O'Gorman;Jeffrey V. Nickerson

  • Document marking and identification using both line and word shifting

    S.H. Low;N.F. Maxemchuk;J.T. Brassil;L. O'Gorman

  • Electronic marking and identification techniques to discourage document copying

    J. Brassil;S. Low;N. Maxemchuk;L. O'Gorman

  • Determination of vitality from a non-invasive biomedical measurement for use in fingerprint scanners

    Reza Derakhshani;Stephanie A.C. Schuckers;Larry A. Hornak;Lawrence O'Gorman

  • Document copying deterrent method using line and word shift techniques

    John T. Brassil;Steven H. Low;Nicholas F. Maxemchuk;Lawrence P. O'Gorman

  • Method and system for capturing fingerprints from multiple swipe images

    Lawrence O'Gorman;Xiongwu Xia

  • Protecting ownership rights through digital watermarking

    H. Berghel;L. O'Gorman

  • Document image analysis: A primer

    R. Kasturi;L. O'Gorman;V. Govindaraju

  • Binarization and multithresholding of document images using connectivity

    Lawrence O'Gorman

  • Practical algorithms for image analysis : description, examples, and code

    Michael Seul;Lawrence O'Gorman;Michael J. Sammon

  • The RightPages image-based electronic library for alerting and browsing

    G.A. Story;L. O'Gorman;D. Fox;L.L. Schaper

  • Self-verifying identification card

    David Morris Kristol;Lawrence Patrick O'gorman

  • Image skeletonization method

    John S. Denker;Hans P. Graf;Donnie Henderson;Richard E. Howard

  • Enclosure and biometric data collection for fingerprint sensor device

    Lawrence O'Gorman;Wayne H. Miller

  • Image and document processing techniques for the RightPages electronic library system

    L. O'Gorman

  • Innovations in fingerprint capture devices

    Xiongwu Xia;Lawrence O'Gorman

Frequent Co-Authors

Rangachar Kasturi
Rangachar Kasturi University of South Florida
Nicholas F. Maxemchuk
Nicholas F. Maxemchuk Columbia University
Steven H. Low
Steven H. Low California Institute of Technology
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish
Hosagrahar V. Jagadish University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephanie Schuckers
Stephanie Schuckers Clarkson University
Alfred M. Bruckstein
Alfred M. Bruckstein Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Tin Kam Ho
Tin Kam Ho IBM (United States)
Josef Kittler
Josef Kittler University of Surrey
Alon Orlitsky
Alon Orlitsky University of California, San Diego
Richard Howard
Richard Howard Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Computer Science opens many doors, especially when exploring online education. For those seeking accessible entry points, online associates programs offer a flexible way to build foundational skills and qualify for entry-level tech jobs.

If you’re aiming for advanced roles or higher earning potential, pursuing one of the most in demand masters degrees in computer science and related fields can significantly boost your career prospects.

Affordability is also essential. Many students look for affordable online courses to help reduce debt and manage costs while studying.

Worried about your academic history? Some best online colleges that accept low gpa provide opportunities for learners who may not have a high GPA, making it more inclusive to pursue computer science degrees online.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence O'Gorman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles