World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
24305
World Ranking
10424
National Ranking
4351

Tin Kam Ho publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tin Kam Ho sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tin Kam Ho D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tin Kam Ho sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tin Kam Ho is affiliated with IBM in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Pollution, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Medicine, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability, and the Environment.

The scientist's recent publications cover diverse topics related to machine learning applications, environmental impacts, and antimicrobial resistance. Notable papers include:

  • "Rapid MOSFET Contact Resistance Extraction From Circuit Using SPICE-Augmented Machine Learning Without Feature Extraction," 2021, published in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
  • "What Makes You Hold on to That Old Car? Joint Insights From Machine Learning and Multinomial Logit on Vehicle-Level Transaction Decisions," 2022, Frontiers in Future Transportation
  • "Interpretability, Reproducibility, and Replicability [From the Guest Editors]," 2022, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • "Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) across Diverse Bacterial Species in Shrimp Aquaculture," 2024, Antibiotics
  • "Explainability of Methods for Critical Information Extraction From Clinical Documents: A survey of representative works," 2022, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Tin Kam Ho's research engages heavily with topics such as Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria, Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies, Energy and Environment Impacts, Neural Networks and Applications, Topic Modeling, and Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tin Kam Ho include Liseth Salinas, Thomas VanderYacht, Nikolina Walas, Gabriel Trueba, and Jay P. Graham.

The scientist has contributed multiple papers to prominent publication venues. These venues include:

  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Antibiotics
  • IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
  • Frontiers in Future Transportation

The combination of Tin Kam Ho's publication record and research topics indicates a multidisciplinary approach bridging computer science methodologies with environmental and medical applications, particularly focusing on machine learning techniques and their explainability within critical real-world domains.

Best Publications

  • The random subspace method for constructing decision forests

    Tin Kam Ho

  • Random decision forests

    Tin Kam Ho

  • Decision combination in multiple classifier systems

    Tin Kam Ho;J.J. Hull;S.N. Srihari

  • Complexity measures of supervised classification problems

    Tin Kam Ho;M. Basu

  • Machine Learning Made Easy: A Review of "Scikit-learn" Package in Python Programming Language.

    Jiangang Hao;Tin Kam Ho

  • Nearest Neighbors in Random Subspaces

    Tin Kam Ho

  • How Complex Is Your Classification Problem?: A Survey on Measuring Classification Complexity

    Ana C. Lorena;Luís P. F. Garcia;Jens Lehmann;Marcilio C. P. Souto

  • A Data Complexity Analysis of Comparative Advantages of Decision Forest Constructors

    Tin Kam Ho

  • SignalSLAM: Simultaneous localization and mapping with mixed WiFi, Bluetooth, LTE and magnetic signals

    Piotr Mirowski;Tin Kam Ho;Saehoon Yi;Michael MacDonald

  • MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER COMBINATION: LESSONS AND NEXT STEPS

    Tin Kam Ho

  • Data Complexity in Pattern Recognition

    Mitra Basu;Tin Kam Ho

  • Methods and apparatus for location determination based on dispersed radio frequency tags

    Michael Andrews;Tin Ho;Gregory Kochanaki;Louis Lanzerotti

  • A Sparse Coding Approach to Household Electricity Demand Forecasting in Smart Grids

    Chun-Nam Yu;Piotr Mirowski;Tin Kam Ho

  • Building projectable classifiers of arbitrary complexity

    Tin Kam Ho;E.M. Kleinberg

  • Domain of competence of XCS classifier system in complexity measurement space

    E. Bernado-Mansilla;Tin Kam Ho

  • Design of the 2015 ChaLearn AutoML challenge

    Isabelle Guyon;Kristin Bennett;Gavin Cawley;Hugo Jair Escalante

  • Classification technique using random decision forests

    Tin Kam Ho

  • Demand forecasting in smart grids

    Piotr Mirowski;Sining Chen;Tin Kam Ho;Chun-Nam Yu

  • Large-scale simulation studies in image pattern recognition

    Tin Kam Ho;H.S. Baird

  • Complexity of Classification Problems and Comparative Advantages of Combined Classifiers

    Tin Kam Ho

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan J. Hull
Jonathan J. Hull Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Sargur N. Srihari
Sargur N. Srihari University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Henry S. Baird
Henry S. Baird Lehigh University
Philip Whiting
Philip Whiting Macquarie University
Richard Hull
Richard Hull Spring Hills Foundation
Lawrence O'Gorman
Lawrence O'Gorman Nokia (United States)
Daniel C. Kilper
Daniel C. Kilper Trinity College Dublin
George Nagy
George Nagy Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Jens Lehmann
Jens Lehmann University of Bonn
Edwin R. Hancock
Edwin R. Hancock University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA? There are flexible online options to help launch or accelerate your tech career. If you’re eager to enter the workforce quickly, consider quick certifications that pay well. These short programs focus on in-demand skills like cybersecurity, IT support, and coding, often leading to lucrative entry-level roles.

For those aiming for leadership or specialized positions, look at quick masters degrees online that can often be completed in as little as one year. These programs blend speed with recognized credentials, helping professionals transition or advance in the tech field efficiently.

Not sure which path suits your career goals? Check out the list of what masters program should I do to find high-demand, valuable degrees in technology and related disciplines.

If you’re just starting out, don’t overlook online associate degree programs. These two-year degrees offer foundational knowledge and can serve as a stepping stone to further education or immediate employment in computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Tin Kam Ho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles