World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Canada
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
16192
World Ranking
1998
National Ranking
74

Robert Sabourin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Sabourin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 456 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert Sabourin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Sabourin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Robert Sabourin is affiliated with the École de Technologie Supérieure in Canada and primarily works in the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans various subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Media Technology, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The main topics addressed in their work include Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques, Machine Learning and Data Classification, Data Stream Mining Techniques, Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Face and Expression Recognition, and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Sabourin's recent publications demonstrate diverse research interests, particularly in pattern recognition, dynamic classification, and ensemble methods. Notable recent papers include:

  • Preprocessed dynamic classifier ensemble selection for highly imbalanced drifted data streams, 2020, Information Fusion
  • A white-box analysis on the writer-independent dichotomy transformation applied to offline handwritten signature verification, 2020, Expert Systems with Applications
  • A multi-task approach for contrastive learning of handwritten signature feature representations, 2023, Expert Systems with Applications
  • OLP++: An online local classifier for high dimensional data, 2022, Information Fusion
  • A scalable dynamic ensemble selection using fuzzy hyperboxes, 2023, Information Fusion

Their study has appeared frequently in various venues, with the most publications found in arXiv (Cornell University), Information Fusion, and Expert Systems with Applications. They have also contributed several papers to the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) and the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools.

Throughout their career, Sabourin has collaborated extensively with a range of co-authors, including Rafael M. O. Cruz, Victor L. F. Souza, Adriano L. I. Oliveira, Alceu S. Britto, and George D. C. Cavalcanti. These collaborations reflect connections within key research areas of machine learning and pattern recognition.

Best Publications

  • From dynamic classifier selection to dynamic ensemble selection

    Albert H. R. Ko;Robert Sabourin;Alceu Souza Britto

  • Dynamic classifier selection

    Rafael M.O. Cruz;Robert Sabourin;George D.C. Cavalcanti

  • Learning features for offline handwritten signature verification using deep convolutional neural networks

    Luiz G. Hafemann;Robert Sabourin;Luiz S. Oliveira

  • Dynamic selection of classifiers-A comprehensive review

    Alceu S. Britto;Alceu S. Britto;Robert Sabourin;Luiz E. S. Oliveira

  • “One Against One” or “One Against All”: Which One is Better for Handwriting Recognition with SVMs?

    Jonathan Milgram;Mohamed Cheriet;Robert Sabourin

  • Automatic recognition of handwritten numerical strings: a recognition and verification strategy

    L.S. Oliveira;R. Sabourin;F. Bortolozzi;C.Y. Suen

  • A comparison of SVM and HMM classifiers in the off-line signature verification

    Edson J. R. Justino;Flávio Bortolozzi;Robert Sabourin

  • Off-line signature verification using HMM for random, simple and skilled forgeries

    E.J.R. Justino;F. Bortolozzi;R. Sabourin

  • An HMM-based approach for off-line unconstrained handwritten word modeling and recognition

    A. El-Yacoubi;M. Gilloux;R. Sabourin;C.Y. Suen

  • Large vocabulary off-line handwriting recognition: A survey

    A. L. Koerich;R. Sabourin;C. Y. Suen

  • Optimization of HVAC Control System Strategy Using Two-Objective Genetic Algorithm

    Nabil Nassif;Stanislaw Kajl;Robert Sabourin

  • Reducing forgeries in writer-independent off-line signature verification through ensemble of classifiers

    D. Bertolini;L. S. Oliveira;E. Justino;R. Sabourin

  • Offline handwritten signature verification — Literature review

    Luiz G. Hafemann;Robert Sabourin;Luiz S. Oliveira

  • Decoupling Direction and Norm for Efficient Gradient-Based L2 Adversarial Attacks and Defenses

    Jerome Rony;Luiz G. Hafemann;Luiz S. Oliveira;Ismail Ben Ayed

  • META-DES

    Rafael M.O. Cruz;Robert Sabourin;George D.C. Cavalcanti;Tsang Ing Ren

  • Off-line signature verification by local granulometric size distributions

    R. Sabourin;G. Genest;F.J. Preteux

  • A METHODOLOGY FOR FEATURE SELECTION USING MULTIOBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHMS FOR HANDWRITTEN DIGIT STRING RECOGNITION

    Luiz E. Soares de Oliveira;Robert Sabourin;Flávio Bortolozzi;Ching Y. Suen

  • Texture-based descriptors for writer identification and verification

    D. Bertolini;L.S. Oliveira;E. Justino;R. Sabourin

  • A dynamic overproduce-and-choose strategy for the selection of classifier ensembles

    Eulanda M. Dos Santos;Robert Sabourin;Patrick Maupin

  • A neural network approach to off-line signature verification using directional PDF

    Jean-Pierre Drouhard;Robert Sabourin;Mario Godbout

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Granger
Eric Granger École de Technologie Supérieure
Luiz S. Oliveira
Luiz S. Oliveira Federal University of Paraná
Ching Y. Suen
Ching Y. Suen Concordia University
Alessandro L. Koerich
Alessandro L. Koerich École de Technologie Supérieure
Gian Luca Marcialis
Gian Luca Marcialis University of Cagliari
Fabio Roli
Fabio Roli University of Genoa
Mohamed Cheriet
Mohamed Cheriet École de Technologie Supérieure
Réjean Plamondon
Réjean Plamondon Polytechnique Montréal
Ali Miri
Ali Miri Toronto Metropolitan University
Francois Gagnon
Francois Gagnon École de Technologie Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary degree pathways can open up new opportunities for studying Computer Science in the USA. Many students are now opting for online programs due to their flexibility and affordability. For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, 6 month associate degree online options offer a fast-track route to entry-level tech positions.

Business skills are also essential in today’s tech landscape. Enrolling in online business schools can help students gain valuable knowledge in project management and entrepreneurship, further enhancing their career prospects.

Cost is a significant consideration for many. Fortunately, a range of affordable online colleges make studying Computer Science and related fields more accessible. Those interested in combining their tech education with applied engineering can explore the cheapest online engineering degree programs available.

Each of these avenues provides unique advantages, allowing you to tailor your education and career pathway to your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Sabourin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles