World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 7958 7647 601 582 183 8330

Gregor C. Leckebusch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gregor C. Leckebusch between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gregor C. Leckebusch published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2009. 10 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2009. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gregor C. Leckebusch: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 5
2008 4
2009 22
2010 15
2011 6
2012 10
2013 15
2014 10
2015 19
2016 20
2017 6
2018 14
2019 5
2020 8
2021 8
2022 6
2023 7
2024 9
2025 9
2026 1
Total 211
Download as CSV

Gregor C. Leckebusch publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregor C. Leckebusch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 183 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 183
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Gregor C. Leckebusch D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregor C. Leckebusch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Gregor C. Leckebusch is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Environmental Engineering, and Water Science and Technology.

The scientist's research topics focus mainly on climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, ocean waves and remote sensing, hydrology and drought analysis, hydrology and watershed management studies, as well as cryospheric studies and observations.

Gregor C. Leckebusch has authored numerous papers, among which the recent publications include:

  • Large-scale circulation patterns and their influence on European winter windstorm predictions (2022) in Climate Dynamics
  • On the Dependency of Atlantic Hurricane and European Windstorm Hazards (2020) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • A new view on the risk of typhoon occurrence in the western North Pacific (2021) in Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • Assessment of mudflow risk in Uzbekistan using CMIP5 models (2021) in Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Objective identification of potentially damaging tropical cyclones over the Western North Pacific (2020) in Environmental Research Communications

Frequent co-authors working alongside Gregor C. Leckebusch include:

  • Kelvin S. Ng
  • Michael Angus
  • Kevin I. Hodges
  • Lisa Degenhardt
  • Adam A. Scaife

The scientist's publications appear regularly in notable venues such as:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Best Publications

  • IMILAST: A Community Effort to Intercompare Extratropical Cyclone Detection and Tracking Algorithms

    Urs Neu;Mirseid G. Akperov;Nina Bellenbaum;Rasmu S. Benestad

  • Extra-tropical cyclones in the present and future climate: a review

    U. Ulbrich;G. C. Leckebusch;Joaquim G Pinto

  • The 2003 European summer heatwaves and drought - synoptic diagnosis and impacts

    Andreas H. Fink;Tim Brücher;Andreas Krüger;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • IMILAST – a community effort to intercompare extratropical cyclone detection and tracking algorithms: assessing method-related uncertainties

    Urs Neu;Mirseid G. Akperov;Nina Bellenbaum;Rasmus Benestad

  • Factors contributing to the development of extreme North Atlantic cyclones and their relationship with the NAO

    Joaquim G. Pinto;Stefan Zacharias;Andreas H. Fink;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • Changing Northern Hemisphere Storm Tracks in an Ensemble of IPCC Climate Change Simulations

    U. Ulbrich;Joaquim G Pinto;H. Kupfer;G. C. Leckebusch

  • The central European floods of August 2002: Part 1 - Rainfall periods and flood development

    Uwe Ulbrich;Tim Brücher;Andreas H. Fink;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • Changes in storm track and cyclone activity in three SRES ensemble experiments with the ECHAM5/MPI-OM1 GCM

    Joaquim G Pinto;U. Ulbrich;G. C. Leckebusch;T. Spangehl

  • Summer Floods in Central Europe – Climate Change Track?

    Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz;Uwe Ulbrich;Tim brücher;Dariusz Graczyk

  • On the relationship between cyclones and extreme windstorm events over Europe under climate change

    Gregor C. Leckebusch;Uwe Ulbrich

  • Factors contributing to the development of extreme North Atlantic cyclones and their relationship with the NAO

    Unknown

  • Cyclones causing wind storms in the Mediterranean: characteristics, trends and links to large-scale patterns

    K. M. Nissen;G. C. Leckebusch;Joaquim G Pinto;D. Renggli

  • Climate of the Mediterranean: Synoptic Patterns, Temperature, Precipitation, Winds, and Their Extremes

    Uwe Ulbrich;Piero Lionello;Danijel Belušić;Jucundus Jacobeit

  • The central European floods of August 2002: Part 2 –Synoptic causes and considerations with respect to climatic change

    Uwe Ulbrich;Tim Brücher;Andreas H. Fink;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • Property loss potentials for European midlatitude storms in a changing climate

    Gregor C. Leckebusch;Uwe Ulbrich;Luise Fröhlich;Luise Fröhlich;Joaquim G. Pinto

  • Examination of wind storms over Central Europe with respect to circulation weather types and NAO phases

    Markus G. Donat;Gregor C. Leckebusch;Joaquim G. Pinto;Uwe Ulbrich

  • Future changes in European winter storm losses and extreme wind speeds inferred from GCM and RCM multi-model simulations

    M. G. Donat;M. G. Donat;G. C. Leckebusch;S. Wild;U. Ulbrich

  • Analysis of frequency and intensity of European winter storm events from a multi-model perspective, at synoptic and regional scales

    Gregor C. Leckebusch;Brigitte Koffi;Uwe Ulbrich;Joaquim G. Pinto

  • Reanalysis suggests long‐term upward trends in European storminess since 1871

    M. G. Donat;M. G. Donat;D. Renggli;D. Renggli;S. Wild;L. V. Alexander

  • Development and application of an objective storm severity measure for the Northeast Atlantic region

    Gregor C. Leckebusch;Dominik Renggli;Uwe Ulbrich

  • Changing European storm loss potentials under modified climate conditions according to ensemble simulations of the ECHAM5/MPI-OM1 GCM

    Joaquim G Pinto;E. L. Fröhlich;E. L. Fröhlich;G. C. Leckebusch;U. Ulbrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Uwe Ulbrich
Uwe Ulbrich Freie Universität Berlin
Joaquim G. Pinto
Joaquim G. Pinto Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Markus G. Donat
Markus G. Donat Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Piero Lionello
Piero Lionello University of Salento
Ian Simmonds
Ian Simmonds University of Melbourne
Christoph C. Raible
Christoph C. Raible University of Bern
Andreas H. Fink
Andreas H. Fink Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ulrich Cubasch
Ulrich Cubasch Freie Universität Berlin
Antje Weisheimer
Antje Weisheimer University of Oxford
Andrea Toreti
Andrea Toreti University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences opens doors to diverse online degree options that complement this field. For those interested in broad foundational knowledge, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers flexibility and affordability while covering interdisciplinary topics linked to environmental awareness.

If you're aiming for a specialized career, pursuing an online geoscience degree will deepen your understanding of Earth systems, mineral resources, and environmental impact. This path is ideal for those interested in planetary health and natural resource management.

For professionals considering advanced practice or leadership roles, enrolling in the cheapest dsw program can enhance expertise in social aspects related to environmental justice and community health.

Finally, individuals keen on balancing academics with other commitments might explore the easiest bachelor's degree programs online. These options help students build relevant skills while managing workload to suit their lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Gregor C. Leckebusch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles