World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
74
Citations
17615
World Ranking
1360
National Ranking
92

Joaquim G. Pinto publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joaquim G. Pinto sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 329 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Joaquim G. Pinto D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joaquim G. Pinto sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Joaquim G. Pinto is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences with a strong focus on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work covers a range of topics primarily related to climate and weather phenomena, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Tropical and extratropical cyclones research
  • Hydrology and drought analysis
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Geology and paleoclimatology research

Recent publications by Joaquim G. Pinto include:

  • "Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards", 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Guidelines for Studying Diverse Types of Compound Weather and Climate Events", 2021, Earth's Future
  • "Atmospheric blocking and weather extremes over the Euro-Atlantic sector - a review", 2022, Weather and Climate Dynamics
  • "A multi-disciplinary analysis of the exceptional flood event of July 2021 in central Europe - Part 1: Event description and analysis", 2023, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
  • "Extreme weather and societal impacts in the eastern Mediterranean", 2022, Earth System Dynamics

The main venues where this scientist frequently publishes include:

  • Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
  • International Journal of Climatology
  • Weather and Climate Dynamics
  • Earth System Dynamics
  • Journal of Climate

Joaquim G. Pinto often collaborates with several researchers, with the most frequent co-authors being:

  • Patrick Ludwig
  • Hendrik Feldmann
  • Alexandre M. Ramos
  • Julia Moemken
  • Assaf Hochman

Best Publications

  • IMILAST: A Community Effort to Intercompare Extratropical Cyclone Detection and Tracking Algorithms

    Urs Neu;Mirseid G. Akperov;Nina Bellenbaum;Rasmu S. Benestad

  • Extra-tropical cyclones in the present and future climate: a review

    U. Ulbrich;G. C. Leckebusch;Joaquim G Pinto

  • Objective Climatology of Cyclones in the Mediterranean Region

    Isabel F. Trigo;Trevor D. Davies;Grant R. Bigg

  • The 2003 European summer heatwaves and drought - synoptic diagnosis and impacts

    Andreas H. Fink;Tim Brücher;Andreas Krüger;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • IMILAST – a community effort to intercompare extratropical cyclone detection and tracking algorithms: assessing method-related uncertainties

    Urs Neu;Mirseid G. Akperov;Nina Bellenbaum;Rasmus Benestad

  • Response of the North Atlantic storm track to climate change shaped by ocean–atmosphere coupling

    Tim Woollings;Jonathan M. Gregory;Joaquim G Pinto;M. Reyers

  • Synoptic-Scale Controls of Persistent Low Temperature and Icy Weather over Southern China in January 2008

    Wen Zhou;Johnny C. L. Chan;Wen Chen;Jian Ling

  • The European storm Kyrill in January 2007: synoptic evolution, meteorological impacts and some considerations with respect to climate change

    Andreas H. Fink;Tim Brücher;Volker Ermert;Andreas Krüger

  • Factors contributing to the development of extreme North Atlantic cyclones and their relationship with the NAO

    Joaquim G. Pinto;Stefan Zacharias;Andreas H. Fink;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • Changing Northern Hemisphere Storm Tracks in an Ensemble of IPCC Climate Change Simulations

    U. Ulbrich;Joaquim G Pinto;H. Kupfer;G. C. Leckebusch

  • The central European floods of August 2002: Part 1 - Rainfall periods and flood development

    Uwe Ulbrich;Tim Brücher;Andreas H. Fink;Gregor C. Leckebusch

  • Changes in storm track and cyclone activity in three SRES ensemble experiments with the ECHAM5/MPI-OM1 GCM

    Joaquim G Pinto;U. Ulbrich;G. C. Leckebusch;T. Spangehl

  • Three extreme storms over Europe in December 1999

    U. Ulbrich;A. H. Fink;M. Klawa;Joaquim G Pinto

  • Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards

    Bruno Merz;Christian Kuhlicke;Michael Kunz;Massimiliano Pittore

  • Climate change scenarios applied to viticultural zoning in Europe

    Aureliano C. Malheiro;João A. Santos;Helder Fraga;Joaquim G. Pinto

  • Factors contributing to the development of extreme North Atlantic cyclones and their relationship with the NAO

    Unknown

  • Sensitivities of a cyclone detection and tracking algorithm: individual tracks and climatology

    Joaquim G. Pinto;Thomas Spangehl;Uwe Ulbrich;Peter Speth

  • Past and recent changes in the North Atlantic oscillation

    Joaquim G. Pinto;Christoph C. Raible

  • Guidelines for Studying Diverse Types of Compound Weather and Climate Events

    Emanuele Bevacqua;Emanuele Bevacqua;Carlo De Michele;Colin Manning;Anaïs Couasnon

  • Cyclones causing wind storms in the Mediterranean: characteristics, trends and links to large-scale patterns

    K. M. Nissen;G. C. Leckebusch;Joaquim G Pinto;D. Renggli

  • Regionally coupled atmosphere-ocean-sea ice-marine biogeochemistry model ROM: 1. Description and validation

    Dmitry V. Sein;Uwe Mikolajewicz;Matthias Gröger;Irina Fast

  • Objective climatology of cyclones in the Mediterranean region: a consensus view among methods with different system identification and tracking criteria

    Piero Lionello;Isabel F. Trigo;Victoria Gil;Margarida L. R. Liberato

Frequent Co-Authors

Uwe Ulbrich
Uwe Ulbrich Freie Universität Berlin
Gregor C. Leckebusch
Gregor C. Leckebusch University of Birmingham
Andreas H. Fink
Andreas H. Fink Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
João A. C. Santos
João A. C. Santos Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Margarida L. R. Liberato
Margarida L. R. Liberato University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
Ricardo M. Trigo
Ricardo M. Trigo University of Lisbon
Christoph C. Raible
Christoph C. Raible University of Bern
Isabel F. Trigo
Isabel F. Trigo Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera
Len Shaffrey
Len Shaffrey University of Reading
Piero Lionello
Piero Lionello University of Salento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens many doors, but exploring related online degrees can broaden career options. For educators or those interested in academic leadership, transitioning from eds to edd program offers advanced expertise and expanded opportunities.

Social work intersects with environmental justice and community health, making an online dsw programs a valuable path for those aiming to impact environmental policies through social frameworks.

For students seeking a flexible, interdisciplinary approach, affordable options like a cheap online general studies degree provide a broad foundation that complements specialized environmental knowledge.

Additionally, selecting the easiest bachelor degree to get can help motivated learners quickly build credentials, making career transitions into environmental sectors more accessible.

By exploring these pathways, students and professionals can tailor their education to match evolving environmental challenges and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Joaquim G. Pinto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles