World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
27988
World Ranking
2524
National Ranking
109

Jens Lehmann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Lehmann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 346 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jens Lehmann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Lehmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Jens Lehmann is affiliated with the University of Bonn in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence. Their body of research includes a strong emphasis on advanced graph neural networks, natural language processing techniques, and topic modeling.

Their recent publications showcase a range of topics within knowledge graph research and machine learning. Notable papers include:

  • PyKEEN 1.0: A Python Library for Training and Evaluating Knowledge Graph Embeddings, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Trans4E: Link prediction on scholarly knowledge graphs, 2021, Neurocomputing
  • Time-aware Graph Neural Network for Entity Alignment between Temporal Knowledge Graphs, 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Introduction to neural network-based question answering over knowledge graphs, 2021, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
  • SGPT: A Generative Approach for SPARQL Query Generation From Natural Language Questions, 2022, IEEE Access

Jens Lehmann collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including Sahar Vahdati, Mojtaba Nayyeri, Md Rashad Al Hasan Rony, Chengjin Xu, and Ricardo Usbeck. Collaboration counts with these co-authors range from 11 to 35 joint publications.

Their research has been published predominantly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Access, and Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Other venues include Journal der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

The main fields of study encompass:

  • Computer Science

Within computer science, their subfields of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Molecular Biology
  • Information Systems

Research topics covered in their work incorporate:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Best Publications

  • DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data

    Sören Auer;Christian Bizer;Georgi Kobilarov;Jens Lehmann

  • DBpedia - A Large-scale, Multilingual Knowledge Base Extracted from Wikipedia

    Jens Lehmann;Robert Isele;Max Jakob;Anja Jentzsch

  • DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data

    Christian Bizer;Jens Lehmann;Georgi Kobilarov;Sören Auer

  • Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey

    Amrapali Zaveri;Anisa Rula;Andrea Maurino;Ricardo Pietrobon

  • Template-based question answering over RDF data

    Christina Unger;Lorenz Bühmann;Jens Lehmann;Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

  • OntoWiki: A Tool for Social, Semantic Collaboration.

    Sören Auer;Sebastian Dietzold;Jens Lehmann;Thomas Riechert

  • LinkedGeoData: A core for a web of spatial open data

    Claus Stadler;Jens Lehmann;Konrad Höffner;Sören Auer

  • Triplify: light-weight linked data publication from relational databases

    Sören Auer;Sebastian Dietzold;Jens Lehmann;Sebastian Hellmann

  • DBpedia SPARQL benchmark: performance assessment with real queries on real data

    Mohamed Morsey;Jens Lehmann;Sören Auer;Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

  • LinkedGeoData: Adding a Spatial Dimension to the Web of Data

    Sören Auer;Jens Lehmann;Sebastian Hellmann

  • What Have Innsbruck and Leipzig in Common? Extracting Semantics from Wiki Content

    Sören Auer;Jens Lehmann

  • Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality

    Dimitris Kontokostas;Patrick Westphal;Sören Auer;Sebastian Hellmann

  • Neural Network-based Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs on Word and Character Level

    Denis Lukovnikov;Asja Fischer;Jens Lehmann;Sören Auer

  • Assessing linked data mappings using network measures

    Christophe Guéret;Paul Groth;Claus Stadler;Jens Lehmann

  • Integrating NLP Using Linked Data

    Sebastian Hellmann;Jens Lehmann;Sören Auer;Martin Brümmer

  • How Complex Is Your Classification Problem?: A Survey on Measuring Classification Complexity

    Ana C. Lorena;Luís P. F. Garcia;Jens Lehmann;Marcilio C. P. Souto

  • Survey on challenges of Question Answering in the Semantic Web

    Konrad Höffner;Sebastian Walter;Edgard Marx;Ricardo Usbeck

  • Concept learning in description logics using refinement operators

    Jens Lehmann;Pascal Hitzler

  • LC-QuAD: A Corpus for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs

    Priyansh Trivedi;Gaurav Maheshwari;Mohnish Dubey;Jens Lehmann

  • Introduction to linked data and its lifecycle on the web

    Sören Auer;Jens Lehmann;Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo;Amrapali Zaveri

  • LODStats --- an extensible framework for high-performance dataset analytics

    Sören Auer;Jan Demter;Michael Martin;Jens Lehmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Sören Auer
Sören Auer University of Hannover
Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo University of Paderborn
Pascal Hitzler
Pascal Hitzler Kansas State University
Christian Bizer
Christian Bizer University of Mannheim
Ruben Verborgh
Ruben Verborgh Ghent University
Elena Simperl
Elena Simperl King's College London
Paul Groth
Paul Groth University of Amsterdam
Volker Tresp
Volker Tresp Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jeff Z. Pan
Jeff Z. Pan University of Edinburgh
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degree options and career pathways. For those looking to minimize costs while maximizing educational value, exploring the cheapest bachelor's degree online options is a great starting point. These programs can help you build a strong foundation in tech without a large financial burden.

If you’re interested in combining computer science with applied technology, consider the opportunities offered by online colleges for engineering. These degrees often feature coursework relevant to software development, systems architecture, and more, making them ideal for tech-focused careers.

For professionals aiming to move into management roles, an affordable emba programs can provide the business leadership skills that pair well with a technical background. This combination is highly attractive to employers in the tech industry.

Lastly, combining computer science with areas such as library and information science is also an option. Earning a mlis degree online allows graduates to specialize in digital information management, a growing field as organizations seek skilled data professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Lehmann

Trending Scientists