World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8904 8653 538 531 325 6492

Elena Simperl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elena Simperl between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elena Simperl published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 17.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2011. 21 of the 405 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2011. 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

405 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elena Simperl: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 4
2005 6
2006 12
2007 14
2008 13
2009 20
2010 11
2011 37
2012 18
2013 7
2014 18
2015 19
2016 13
2017 25
2018 37
2019 21
2020 18
2021 11
2022 22
2023 21
2024 37
2025 20
2026 1
Total 405
Download as CSV

Elena Simperl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Simperl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 322–331 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 325 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206 325
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Elena Simperl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Simperl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Elena Simperl is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has a concentrated academic focus within the field of Computer Science, with 120 related publications. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Communication, Information Systems, and Computer Science Applications.

The scientist's work touches on several specialized topics, such as Topic Modeling, Data Quality and Management, Wikis in Education and Collaboration, Advanced Graph Neural Networks, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Recent papers by Elena Simperl include the following:

  • A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines, 2023, Journal of Data and Information Quality
  • Talking datasets - Understanding data sensemaking behaviours, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Toward a Formal Scholarly Understanding of Blockchain-Mediated Decentralization: A Systematic Review and a Framework, 2020, Frontiers in Blockchain
  • Dataset Reuse: Toward Translating Principles to Practice, 2020, Patterns
  • Data protection by design: Building the foundations of trustworthy data sharing, 2020, Data & Policy

Elena Simperl frequently collaborates with various co-authors, including Albert Meroño-Peñuela, Óscar Corcho, Neal Reeves, Odinaldo Rodrigues, and Elisavet Koutsiana, with collaboration counts ranging from 9 to 24 joint works.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 26 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 9 publications
  • Journal of Web Semantics with 5 publications
  • Data & Policy with 4 publications
  • Semantic Web with 4 publications

In addition to journal articles, Elena Simperl has contributed to book publications, including works published by Springer Science+Business Media and the European Organization for Nuclear Research. Noteworthy titles include "The Semantic Web: ESWC 2022 Satellite Events" (2022) and "Participatory Science Toolkit Against Pollution" (2022).

Among their recognitions, Elena Simperl was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study

    Elena Simperl

  • CrowdMap: crowdsourcing ontology alignment with microtasks

    Cristina Sarasua;Elena Simperl;Natalya F. Noy

  • Dataset search: a survey

    Adriane Chapman;Elena Simperl;Laura Koesten;George Konstantinidis

  • Semantic Web Services

    Dieter Fensel;Federico Michele Facca;Elena Simperl;Ioan Toma

  • T-REx: A large scale alignment of natural language with knowledge base triples

    Hady ElSahar;Pavlos Vougiouklis;Arslen Remaci;Christophe Gravier

  • An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project

    Ramine Tinati;Markus Luczak-Roesch;Elena Simperl;Wendy Hall

  • Crowdsourcing Linked Data Quality Assessment

    Maribel Acosta;Amrapali Zaveri;Elena Simperl;Dimitris Kontokostas

  • Ontology engineering: a reality check

    Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl;Christoph Tempich

  • The Semanic Web: Research and Applications

    Grigoris Antoniou;Marko Grobelnik;Elena Simperl;Bijan Parsia

  • Collaborative ontology engineering: a survey

    Elena Simperl;Markus Luczak-Rösch

  • Tuplespace-based computing for the semantic web: A survey of the state-of-the-art

    Lyndon j. b. Nixon;Elena Simperl;Reto Krummenacher;Francisco Martin-recuerda

  • Human Intelligence in the Process of Semantic Content Creation

    Katharina Siorpaes;Elena Simperl

  • Towards a classification framework for social machines

    Nigel R. Shadbolt;Daniel A. Smith;Elena Simperl;Max Van Kleek

  • Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform

    Ramine Tinati;Max Van Kleek;Elena Simperl;Markus Luczak-Rösch

  • The Trials and Tribulations of Working with Structured Data: -a Study on Information Seeking Behaviour

    Laura M. Koesten;Emilia Kacprzak;Jenifer F. A. Tennison;Elena Simperl

  • Argumentation-Based Ontology Engineering

    C. Tempich;E. Simperl;M. Luczak;R. Studer

  • ONTOCOM : A cost estimation model for ontology engineering

    Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl;Christoph Tempich;York Sure

  • Improving Paid Microtasks through Gamification and Adaptive Furtherance Incentives

    Oluwaseyi Feyisetan;Elena Simperl;Max Van Kleek;Nigel Shadbolt

  • Towards the Future Internet - Emerging Trends from European Research

    G. Tselentis;A. Galis;A. Gavras;S. Krco

  • Towards the Future Internet

    G. Tselentis;A. Galis;A. Gavras;S. Krco

  • Dataset search: a survey

    Adriane Chapman;Elena Simperl;Laura Koesten;George Konstantinidis

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar Corcho
Oscar Corcho Technical University of Madrid
Dieter Fensel
Dieter Fensel University of Innsbruck
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford
John Domingue
John Domingue The Open University
Wendy Hall
Wendy Hall University of Southampton
Marko Grobelnik
Marko Grobelnik Jožef Stefan Institute
Grigoris Antoniou
Grigoris Antoniou University of Huddersfield
Bijan Parsia
Bijan Parsia University of Manchester
Dimitris Plexousakis
Dimitris Plexousakis University of Crete
Max Van Kleek
Max Van Kleek University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re looking to launch or advance a career in computer science, there are several online options to consider. Many students explore graduate degrees that are worth it to gain specialized skills and enhance their job prospects. These advanced programs can open doors to higher-paying roles and leadership positions in the tech industry.

For a quicker entry into the workforce, 1 year associate degree programs online offer a flexible and efficient way to build foundational tech skills. These programs are ideal for those seeking affordable options or a fast track to a new career.

Budget is often a major concern for students, but there are affordable online colleges that deliver quality education without overwhelming debt. Even if you have a less competitive academic history, many online schools that accept low gpa offer accessible pathways to further your studies in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Simperl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles