World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
6492
World Ranking
8904
National Ranking
538

Elena Simperl publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Simperl sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 325 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Elena Simperl D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Simperl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Elena Simperl is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has a concentrated academic focus within the field of Computer Science, with 120 related publications. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Communication, Information Systems, and Computer Science Applications.

The scientist's work touches on several specialized topics, such as Topic Modeling, Data Quality and Management, Wikis in Education and Collaboration, Advanced Graph Neural Networks, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Recent papers by Elena Simperl include the following:

  • A Survey of Data Quality Requirements That Matter in ML Development Pipelines, 2023, Journal of Data and Information Quality
  • Talking datasets - Understanding data sensemaking behaviours, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Toward a Formal Scholarly Understanding of Blockchain-Mediated Decentralization: A Systematic Review and a Framework, 2020, Frontiers in Blockchain
  • Dataset Reuse: Toward Translating Principles to Practice, 2020, Patterns
  • Data protection by design: Building the foundations of trustworthy data sharing, 2020, Data & Policy

Elena Simperl frequently collaborates with various co-authors, including Albert Meroño-Peñuela, Óscar Corcho, Neal Reeves, Odinaldo Rodrigues, and Elisavet Koutsiana, with collaboration counts ranging from 9 to 24 joint works.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 26 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 9 publications
  • Journal of Web Semantics with 5 publications
  • Data & Policy with 4 publications
  • Semantic Web with 4 publications

In addition to journal articles, Elena Simperl has contributed to book publications, including works published by Springer Science+Business Media and the European Organization for Nuclear Research. Noteworthy titles include "The Semantic Web: ESWC 2022 Satellite Events" (2022) and "Participatory Science Toolkit Against Pollution" (2022).

Among their recognitions, Elena Simperl was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study

    Elena Simperl

  • CrowdMap: crowdsourcing ontology alignment with microtasks

    Cristina Sarasua;Elena Simperl;Natalya F. Noy

  • Dataset search: a survey

    Adriane Chapman;Elena Simperl;Laura Koesten;George Konstantinidis

  • Semantic Web Services

    Dieter Fensel;Federico Michele Facca;Elena Simperl;Ioan Toma

  • T-REx: A large scale alignment of natural language with knowledge base triples

    Hady ElSahar;Pavlos Vougiouklis;Arslen Remaci;Christophe Gravier

  • An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project

    Ramine Tinati;Markus Luczak-Roesch;Elena Simperl;Wendy Hall

  • Crowdsourcing Linked Data Quality Assessment

    Maribel Acosta;Amrapali Zaveri;Elena Simperl;Dimitris Kontokostas

  • Ontology engineering: a reality check

    Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl;Christoph Tempich

  • The Semanic Web: Research and Applications

    Grigoris Antoniou;Marko Grobelnik;Elena Simperl;Bijan Parsia

  • Collaborative ontology engineering: a survey

    Elena Simperl;Markus Luczak-Rösch

  • Tuplespace-based computing for the semantic web: A survey of the state-of-the-art

    Lyndon j. b. Nixon;Elena Simperl;Reto Krummenacher;Francisco Martin-recuerda

  • Human Intelligence in the Process of Semantic Content Creation

    Katharina Siorpaes;Elena Simperl

  • Towards a classification framework for social machines

    Nigel R. Shadbolt;Daniel A. Smith;Elena Simperl;Max Van Kleek

  • Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform

    Ramine Tinati;Max Van Kleek;Elena Simperl;Markus Luczak-Rösch

  • The Trials and Tribulations of Working with Structured Data: -a Study on Information Seeking Behaviour

    Laura M. Koesten;Emilia Kacprzak;Jenifer F. A. Tennison;Elena Simperl

  • Argumentation-Based Ontology Engineering

    C. Tempich;E. Simperl;M. Luczak;R. Studer

  • ONTOCOM : A cost estimation model for ontology engineering

    Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl;Christoph Tempich;York Sure

  • Improving Paid Microtasks through Gamification and Adaptive Furtherance Incentives

    Oluwaseyi Feyisetan;Elena Simperl;Max Van Kleek;Nigel Shadbolt

  • Towards the Future Internet - Emerging Trends from European Research

    G. Tselentis;A. Galis;A. Gavras;S. Krco

  • Towards the Future Internet

    G. Tselentis;A. Galis;A. Gavras;S. Krco

  • Dataset search: a survey

    Adriane Chapman;Elena Simperl;Laura Koesten;George Konstantinidis

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar Corcho
Oscar Corcho Technical University of Madrid
Dieter Fensel
Dieter Fensel University of Innsbruck
Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford
John Domingue
John Domingue The Open University
Wendy Hall
Wendy Hall University of Southampton
Marko Grobelnik
Marko Grobelnik Jožef Stefan Institute
Grigoris Antoniou
Grigoris Antoniou University of Huddersfield
Bijan Parsia
Bijan Parsia University of Manchester
Dimitris Plexousakis
Dimitris Plexousakis University of Crete
Max Van Kleek
Max Van Kleek University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re looking to launch or advance a career in computer science, there are several online options to consider. Many students explore graduate degrees that are worth it to gain specialized skills and enhance their job prospects. These advanced programs can open doors to higher-paying roles and leadership positions in the tech industry.

For a quicker entry into the workforce, 1 year associate degree programs online offer a flexible and efficient way to build foundational tech skills. These programs are ideal for those seeking affordable options or a fast track to a new career.

Budget is often a major concern for students, but there are affordable online colleges that deliver quality education without overwhelming debt. Even if you have a less competitive academic history, many online schools that accept low gpa offer accessible pathways to further your studies in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Simperl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles