World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gianluca Demartini

Gianluca Demartini

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5173
World Ranking
11711
National Ranking
356

Gianluca Demartini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianluca Demartini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gianluca Demartini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianluca Demartini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Gianluca Demartini is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and has a primary research focus within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The scientist's research engages deeply with topics related to Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Topic Modeling, Data Quality and Management, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Open Source Software Innovations, and Auction Theory and Applications.

Among their recent papers are:

  • The many dimensions of truthfulness: Crowdsourcing misinformation assessments on a multidimensional scale (2021), published in Information Processing & Management
  • Crowdsourced Fact-Checking at Twitter (2022), published in Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
  • Cognitive Biases in Fact-Checking and Their Countermeasures: A Review (2024), published in Information Processing & Management
  • Evaluating the Quality of Learning Resources: A Learnersourcing Approach (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • Who Determines What Is Relevant? Humans or AI? Why Not Both? (2024), published in Communications of the ACM

Frequent co-authors with whom Demartini has collaborated include:

  • Shazia Sadiq
  • Kevin Roitero
  • Stefano Mizzaro
  • Lei Han
  • Damiano Spina

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Information Processing & Management
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

Gianluca Demartini was awarded the ACM Senior Member distinction in 2020.

Best Publications

  • ZenCrowd: leveraging probabilistic reasoning and crowdsourcing techniques for large-scale entity linking

    Gianluca Demartini;Djellel Eddine Difallah;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • Understanding Malicious Behavior in Crowdsourcing Platforms: The Case of Online Surveys

    Ujwal Gadiraju;Ricardo Kawase;Stefan Dietze;Gianluca Demartini

  • The Dynamics of Micro-Task Crowdsourcing: The Case of Amazon MTurk

    Djellel Eddine Difallah;Michele Catasta;Gianluca Demartini;Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis

  • Pick-a-crowd: tell me what you like, and i'll tell you what to do

    Djellel Eddine Difallah;Gianluca Demartini;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • Using Twitter as a Data Source: An Overview of Ethical, Legal, and Methodological Challenges

    Wasim Ahmed;Peter A. Bath;Gianluca Demartini

  • Overview of the INEX 2009 entity ranking track

    Gianluca Demartini;Tereza Iofciu;Arjen P. De Vries

  • Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgment

    Unknown

  • Mechanical cheat: Spamming schemes and adversarial techniques on crowdsourcing platforms

    Djellel Eddine Difallah;Gianluca Demartini;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • Large-scale linked data integration using probabilistic reasoning and crowdsourcing

    Gianluca Demartini;Djellel Eddine Difallah;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • Novel insights into views towards H1N1 during the 2009 Pandemic: a thematic analysis of Twitter data

    Wasim Ahmed;Peter A. Bath;Laura Sbaffi;Gianluca Demartini

  • Combining inverted indices and structured search for ad-hoc object retrieval

    Alberto Tonon;Gianluca Demartini;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • Finding experts using Wikipedia

    Gianluca Demartini

  • Scaling-Up the Crowd: Micro-Task Pricing Schemes for Worker Retention and Latency Improvement

    Djellel Eddine Difallah;Michele Catasta;Gianluca Demartini;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • Overview of the INEX 2008 Entity Ranking Track

    Gianluca Demartini;Arjen P. Vries;Tereza Iofciu;Jianhan Zhu

  • Modeling Task Complexity in Crowdsourcing

    Jie Yang;Judith Redi;Gianluca Demartini;Alessandro Bozzon

  • TRank: Ranking Entity Types Using the Web of Data

    Alberto Tonon;Michele Catasta;Gianluca Demartini;Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

  • The Impact of Task Abandonment in Crowdsourcing

    Lei Han;Kevin Roitero;Ujwal Gadiraju;Cristina Sarasua

  • All Those Wasted Hours: On Task Abandonment in Crowdsourcing

    Lei Han;Kevin Roitero;Ujwal Gadiraju;Cristina Sarasua

  • Crowd Worker Strategies in Relevance Judgment Tasks

    Lei Han;Eddy Maddalena;Alessandro Checco;Cristina Sarasua

  • The many dimensions of truthfulness: Crowdsourcing misinformation assessments on a multidimensional scale

    Michael Soprano;Kevin Roitero;David La Barbera;Davide Ceolin

  • Investigating User Perception of Gender Bias in Image Search: The Role of Sexism

    Jahna Otterbacher;Alessandro Checco;Gianluca Demartini;Paul Clough

  • Let's Agree to Disagree: Fixing Agreement Measures for Crowdsourcing

    Alessandro Checco;Kevin Roitero;Eddy Maddalena;Stefano Mizzaro

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Cudré-Mauroux
Philippe Cudré-Mauroux University of Fribourg
Wolfgang Nejdl
Wolfgang Nejdl University of Hannover
Karl Aberer
Karl Aberer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Shazia Sadiq
Shazia Sadiq University of Queensland
Guido Zuccon
Guido Zuccon University of Queensland
Chris Welty
Chris Welty Google (United States)
Arjen P. de Vries
Arjen P. de Vries Radboud University
Paul Clough
Paul Clough University of Sheffield
Boualem Benatallah
Boualem Benatallah Dublin City University
Nick Craswell
Nick Craswell Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of connected fields and flexible study options. Many students interested in technology also consider pathways like online engineering programs, which offer high-quality education with flexible schedules. If you're intrigued, learning more about electrical engineering degree online admissions can help you compare related technical disciplines.

If you want a quicker entry into the tech workforce, there are short certificate programs that pay well, offering specialized skills in less time than traditional degrees. For those seeking to accelerate their education, you might explore the fastest masters degree online options, allowing you to complete an advanced degree and boost your credentials in as little as 12-18 months.

Finally, if you’re planning your long-term career, it’s useful to focus your efforts on in-demand qualifications. Investigating the most valuable masters degrees can help you choose a path that aligns with employer needs and emerging trends in technology and business.

Best Scientists Citing Gianluca Demartini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles