World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5557
World Ranking
9854
National Ranking
492

Ralf Schenkel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Schenkel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 234 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ralf Schenkel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf Schenkel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralf Schenkel is affiliated with the University of Trier in Germany. Their research is centered in the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on several specialized areas.

The main subfields of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Molecular Biology

Their primary topics of work encompass:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Software Engineering Research

Frequent publication venues for Schenkel's work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Datenbank-Spektrum
  • International Journal on Digital Libraries
  • Scientometrics

Selected recent publications illustrate the scope and direction of their research:

  • "Scientific paper recommendation systems: a literature review of recent publications," 2022, International Journal on Digital Libraries
  • "Towards an Argument Mining Pipeline Transforming Texts to Argument Graphs," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "SchenQL: in-depth analysis of a query language for bibliographic metadata," 2021, International Journal on Digital Libraries
  • "Evaluating semantometrics from computer science publications," 2020, Scientometrics
  • "Same Side Stance Classification Task: Facilitating Argument Stance Classification by Fine-tuning a BERT Model," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent collaborators in research include:

  • Christin Katharina Kreutz
  • Lorik Dumani
  • Premtim Sahitaj
  • Ralph Bergmann
  • Tobias Zeimetz

Best Publications

  • FedX: optimization techniques for federated query processing on linked data

    Andreas Schwarte;Peter Haase;Katja Hose;Ralf Schenkel

  • Top-k query evaluation with probabilistic guarantees

    Martin Theobald;Gerhard Weikum;Ralf Schenkel

  • Efficient top-k querying over social-tagging networks

    Ralf Schenkel;Tom Crecelius;Mouna Kacimi;Sebastian Michel

  • HOPI: An efficient connection index for complex XML document collections

    Ralf Schenkel;Anja Theobald;Gerhard Weikum

  • IO-Top-k: index-access optimized top-k query processing

    Holger Bast;Debapriyo Majumdar;Ralf Schenkel;Martin Theobald

  • An efficient and versatile query engine for TopX search

    Martin Theobald;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum

  • The SphereSearch engine for unified ranked retrieval of heterogeneous XML and web documents

    Jens Graupmann;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum

  • YAWN: A Semantically Annotated Wikipedia XML Corpus

    Ralf Schenkel;Fabian M. Suchanek;Gjergji Kasneci

  • Partout: a distributed engine for efficient RDF processing

    Luis Galárraga;Katja Hose;Ralf Schenkel

  • RankReduce - processing K-nearest Neighbor Queries on Top of MapReduce

    Aleksandar Stupar;Sebastian Michel;Ralf Schenkel

  • Efficient creation and incremental maintenance of the HOPI index for complex XML document collections

    R. Schenkel;A. Theobald;G. Weikum

  • TopX: efficient and versatile top-k query processing for semistructured data

    Martin Theobald;Holger Bast;Debapriyo Majumdar;Ralf Schenkel

  • Language-model-based ranking for queries on RDF-graphs

    Shady Elbassuoni;Maya Ramanath;Ralf Schenkel;Marcin Sydow

  • WARP: Workload-aware replication and partitioning for RDF

    K. Hose;R. Schenkel

  • FedX: a federation layer for distributed query processing on linked open data

    Andreas Schwarte;Peter Haase;Katja Hose;Ralf Schenkel

  • Exploiting social relations for query expansion and result ranking

    M. Bender;T. Crecelius;M. Kacimi;S. Michel

  • Exploiting Structure, Annotation, and Ontological Knowledge for Automatic Classification of XML Data

    Martin Theobald;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum;Vassilis Christophides

  • Efficient text proximity search

    Ralf Schenkel;Andreas Broschart;Seungwon Hwang;Martin Theobald

  • Searching RDF Graphs with SPARQL and Keywords

    Shady Elbassuoni;Maya Ramanath;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum

  • Efficient and self-tuning incremental query expansion for top-k query processing

    Martin Theobald;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum

  • The SphereSearch Engine for Unified Ranked Retrieval of Heterogeneous XML and Web Documents

    Jens Graupmann;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum;Klemens Böhm

  • IO-Top-k: Index-Access Optimized Top-k Query Processing

    Holger Bast;Debapriyo Majumdar;Ralf Schenkel;Martin Theobald

  • Top-k Query Evaluation with Probabilistic Guarantees

    Martin Theobald;Gerhard Weikum;Ralf Schenkel;Mario A. Nascimento

  • An Efficient and Versatile Query Engine for TopX Search

    Martin Theobald;Ralf Schenkel;Gerhard Weikum;Klemens Böhm

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerhard Weikum
Gerhard Weikum Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Jaap Kamps
Jaap Kamps University of Amsterdam
Gabriella Kazai
Gabriella Kazai Microsoft (United States)
Thomas Neumann
Thomas Neumann Technical University of Munich
Norbert Fuhr
Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen
Andreas Harth
Andreas Harth University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Fabian M. Suchanek
Fabian M. Suchanek Télécom ParisTech
Marko Grobelnik
Marko Grobelnik Jožef Stefan Institute
Ioana Manolescu
Ioana Manolescu French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students interested in technology and STEM fields may also consider degrees in other high-demand areas, such as environmental science or engineering.

For those passionate about sustainability, an environmental science degree can lead to impactful roles analyzing ecosystems or developing solutions for global environmental challenges. Alternatively, if you prefer a more technical approach to real-world problems, there are reputable environmental engineering schools online that offer affordable and flexible programs.

If you want to accelerate your tech career, consider enrolling in an online computer science degree program. These programs are designed for students eager to enter the workforce quickly while balancing other commitments. Engineering enthusiasts looking for flexibility and value should also explore the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online options to gain essential skills and credentials without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Ralf Schenkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles