World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
12003
World Ranking
6371
National Ranking
103

Jaap Kamps publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaap Kamps sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 425 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jaap Kamps D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaap Kamps sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Jaap Kamps is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science with a concentration on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and related subfields.

The scientist has actively contributed to various domains including Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Text Readability and Simplification, Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Information Retrieval and Search Behavior, Data Quality and Management, and Library Science and Information Systems.

Kamps's recent publications include the following papers:

  • Learning to rank for multi-label text classification: Combining different sources of information, 2020, Natural Language Engineering
  • Current research on theory and practice of digital libraries: best papers from TPDL 2017, 2020, International Journal on Digital Libraries
  • Revisiting Bag of Words Document Representations for Efficient Ranking with Transformers, 2024, ACM Transactions on Information Systems
  • Neural Coreference Resolution for Dutch Parliamentary Documents with the DutchParliament Dataset, 2023, Data
  • A collection of FAIR Dutch Freedom of Information Act documents, 2025, Scientific Data

The scientist has published frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Liana Ermakova
  • Hosein Azarbonyad
  • Éric SanJuan
  • M. Marx
  • Stéphane Huet

Jaap Kamps has published multiple works in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Discover Computing
  • Natural Language Engineering
  • International Journal on Digital Libraries
  • ACM Transactions on Information Systems

As an author of books, Kamps has contributed to publications under Springer Science+Business Media, including several editions of "Advances in Information Retrieval" released in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Using WordNet to measure semantic orientations of adjectives

    Jaap Kamps;Maarten Marx;Robert J. Mokken;Maarten de Rijke

  • Neural Ranking Models with Weak Supervision

    Mostafa Dehghani;Hamed Zamani;Aliaksei Severyn;Jaap Kamps

  • Neural Ranking Models with Weak Supervision

    M. Dehghani;H. Zamani;A. Severyn;J. Kamps

  • Words with attitude

    J. Kamps;M.J. Marx

  • Worker types and personality traits in crowdsourcing relevance labels

    Gabriella Kazai;Jaap Kamps;Natasa Milic-Frayling

  • Crowdsourcing for book search evaluation: impact of hit design on comparative system ranking

    Gabriella Kazai;Jaap Kamps;Marijn Koolen;Natasa Milic-Frayling

  • From Neural Re-Ranking to Neural Ranking: Learning a Sparse Representation for Inverted Indexing

    Hamed Zamani;Mostafa Dehghani;W. Bruce Croft;Erik Learned-Miller

  • Focused Access to XML Documents: 6th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2007 Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, December 17-19, 2007. Selected Papers

    Norbert Fuhr;Jaap Kamps;Mounia Lalmas;Andrew Trotman

  • An analysis of human factors and label accuracy in crowdsourcing relevance judgments

    Gabriella Kazai;Jaap Kamps;Natasa Milic-Frayling

  • The face of quality in crowdsourcing relevance labels: demographics, personality and labeling accuracy

    Gabriella Kazai;Jaap Kamps;Natasa Milic-Frayling

  • Monolingual Document Retrieval for European Languages

    Vera Hollink;Jaap Kamps;Christof Monz;Maarten De Rijke

  • Overview of the TREC 2013 contextual suggestion track

    Adriel Dean-Hall;Charles L Clarke;Jaap Kamps;Paul Thomas

  • Overview of the TREC 2012 Contextual Suggestion Track.

    Adriel Dean-Hall;Charles L. A. Clarke;Jaap Kamps;Paul Thomas

  • INEX 2007 Evaluation Measures

    Jaap Kamps;Jovan Pehcevski;Gabriella Kazai;Mounia Lalmas

  • An Element-based Approach to XML Retrieval

    B. Sigurbjörnsson;J. Kamps;M. de Rijke

  • Length normalization in XML retrieval

    Jaap Kamps;Maarten de Rijke;Börkur Sigurbjörnsson

  • Advances in Focused Retrieval: 7th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval, INEX 2008, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, December 15-18, 2008. Revised and Selected Papers

    Shlomo Geva;Jaap Kamps;Andrew Trotman

  • Where to stop reading a ranked list?: threshold optimization using truncated score distributions

    Avi Arampatzis;Jaap Kamps;Stephen Edward Robertson

  • Entity ranking using Wikipedia as a pivot

    Rianne Kaptein;Pavel Serdyukov;Arjen De Vries;Jaap Kamps

  • Is Wikipedia link structure different

    Jaap Kamps;Marijn Koolen

  • Report on the SIGIR 2010 workshop on the simulation of interaction

    Leif Azzopardi;Kalervo Järvelin;Jaap Kamps;Mark D. Smucker

Frequent Co-Authors

Maarten Marx
Maarten Marx University of Amsterdam
Maarten de Rijke
Maarten de Rijke University of Amsterdam
Ralf Schenkel
Ralf Schenkel University of Trier
Gabriella Kazai
Gabriella Kazai Microsoft (United States)
Charles L. A. Clarke
Charles L. A. Clarke University of Waterloo
Djoerd Hiemstra
Djoerd Hiemstra Radboud University
Vanessa Murdock
Vanessa Murdock Amazon (United States)
Christof Monz
Christof Monz University of Amsterdam
Norbert Fuhr
Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options can create flexible career pathways for computer science students. Many professionals consider an online masters for data science to expand their expertise in areas like analytics and machine learning. This is especially valuable for those seeking high-demand tech roles without interrupting their current careers.

Students interested in bridging technology with project leadership may look into the best construction management schools to pursue online programs that blend engineering principles with management skills. These degrees can open doors in both tech-driven industries and infrastructure development.

For those aiming to accelerate their leadership potential, affordable online mba programs offer a practical path to business management roles by building key business and technical skills for the digital economy.

Shorter, intensive courses are also emerging as popular options. The online masters completed in just one year provide technical training in a condensed format, enabling rapid upskilling for various tech-driven careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jaap Kamps

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles