World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
50983
World Ranking
5115
National Ranking
2765

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
111
Citations
50520
World Ranking
928
National Ranking
578

Richard A. Miller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Miller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 535 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard A. Miller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Miller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Miller is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant work also spanning subfields such as molecular biology, physiology, aging, epidemiology, and surgery.

The scientist has been notably active in exploring themes related to genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms, adipose tissue and metabolism, pancreatic function and diabetes, circadian rhythm and melatonin, mitochondrial function and pathology, metabolism, diabetes, and cancer, as well as diabetes treatment and management.

Frequent coauthors include Randy Strong, James F. Nelson, David E. Harrison, Peter C. Reifsnyder, and Nadia Rosenthal. These collaborations have contributed to a body of work distributed across several publication venues.

Preferred venues for publication have been:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • GeroScience
  • Aging Cell
  • Aging
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A

Selected recent papers include:

  • Muribaculaceae Genomes Assembled from Metagenomes Suggest Genetic Drivers of Differential Response to Acarbose Treatment in Mice, 2021, mSphere
  • Distinct longevity mechanisms across and within species and their association with aging, 2023, Cell
  • Canagliflozin extends life span in genetically heterogeneous male but not female mice, 2020, JCI Insight
  • Rapamycin-mediated mouse lifespan extension: Late-life dosage regimes with sex-specific effects, 2020, Aging Cell
  • 17-a-estradiol late in life extends lifespan in aging UM-HET3 male mice; nicotinamide riboside and three other drugs do not affect lifespan in either sex, 2021, Aging Cell

Best Publications

  • Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice

    David E. F. Harrison;Randy Strong;Zelton Dave Sharp;James F Nelson

  • The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor PCI-32765 blocks B-cell activation and is efficacious in models of autoimmune disease and B-cell malignancy

    Lee A. Honigberg;Ashley M. Smith;Mint Sirisawad;Erik Verner

  • The Aging Immune System: Primer and Prospectus

    Richard A. Miller

  • Treatment of B-Cell Lymphoma with Monoclonal Anti-Idiotype Antibody

    Richard A. Miller;David G. Maloney;Roger Warnke;Ronald Levy

  • Rapamycin, But Not Resveratrol or Simvastatin, Extends Life Span of Genetically Heterogeneous Mice

    Richard A. Miller;Richard A. Miller;David E. Harrison;C. M. Astle;Joseph A. Baur

  • Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-I and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistance

    Richard A. Miller;Gretchen Buehner;Yayi Chang;James M. Harper

  • Lifespan extension and delayed immune and collagen aging in mutant mice with defects in growth hormone production

    Kevin Flurkey;John Papaconstantinou;Richard A. Miller;David E. Harrison

  • mTOR regulates MAPKAPK2 translation to control the senescence-associated secretory phenotype

    Nicolás Herranz;Suchira Gallage;Massimiliano Mellone;Torsten Wuestefeld

  • Rapamycin slows aging in mice.

    John E. Wilkinson;Lisa Burmeister;Susan V. Brooks;Chi Chao Chan

  • Vitamin E supplementation enhances cell-mediated immunity in healthy elderly subjects.

    S. N. Meydani;M. P. Barklund;S. Liu;M. Meydani

  • Neurocognitive Function and Progression in Patients With Brain Metastases Treated With Whole-Brain Radiation and Motexafin Gadolinium: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial

    Christina A. Meyers;Jennifer A. Smith;Andrea Bezjak;Minesh P. Mehta

  • A clinical trial of anti-idiotype therapy for B cell malignancy.

    Timothy C. Meeker;James Lowder;David G. Maloney;Richard A. Miller

  • Rapamycin-mediated lifespan increase in mice is dose and sex dependent and metabolically distinct from dietary restriction

    Richard A. Miller;David E. Harrison;Clinton M. Astle;Elizabeth Fernandez

  • Survival and Neurologic Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Motexafin Gadolinium and Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in Brain Metastases

    Minesh P. Mehta;Patrick Rodrigus;C. H J Terhaard;Aroor Rao

  • Extending the lifespan of long-lived mice.

    Andrzej Bartke;J. Chris Wright;Julie A. Mattison;Donald K. Ingram

  • Acarbose, 17‐α‐estradiol, and nordihydroguaiaretic acid extend mouse lifespan preferentially in males

    David E. Harrison;Randy Strong;David B. Allison;Bruce N. Ames

  • Aging and immune function

    Richard A. Miller

  • Monoclonal antibody therapeutic trials in seven patients with T-cell lymphoma

    Richard A. Miller;Allan R. Oseroff;Paul T. Stratte;Ronald Levy

  • Texaphyrins: new drugs with diverse clinical applications in radiation and photodynamic therapy.

    Jonathan L Sessler;Richard A Miller

  • Colorectal cancer screening: prospects for molecular stool analysis

    R. Justin Davies;Richard Miller;Nicholas Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan L. Sessler
Jonathan L. Sessler The University of Texas at Austin
David E. Harrison
David E. Harrison Jackson Laboratory
Vadim N. Gladyshev
Vadim N. Gladyshev Brigham and Women's Hospital
John J. Kopchick
John J. Kopchick Ohio University
Vladimír Král
Vladimír Král University of Chemistry and Technology
Martin A. Javors
Martin A. Javors The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Anthony Harriman
Anthony Harriman Newcastle University
Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore
Arlan Richardson
Arlan Richardson University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
David B. Lombard
David B. Lombard University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles