World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
8162
World Ranking
5956
National Ranking
17

Krisztian Balog publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Krisztian Balog sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 241 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Krisztian Balog D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Krisztian Balog sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Krisztian Balog is affiliated with the University of Stavanger in Norway and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research primarily focuses on areas within artificial intelligence, information systems, and subfields such as computer vision and pattern recognition, management science and operations research, and information systems and management.

Their work covers several main topics including topic modeling, recommender systems and techniques, data quality and management, expert finding and Q&A systems, speech and dialogue systems, natural language processing techniques, and personal information management and user behavior.

Frequent publication venues for Krisztian Balog include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Krisztian Balog are:

  • "Web Table Extraction, Retrieval, and Augmentation", 2020, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
  • "Web Table Extraction, Retrieval and Augmentation: A Survey", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "On Natural Language User Profiles for Transparent and Scrutable Recommendation", 2022, Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
  • "A Systematic Review of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in Information Retrieval", 2023, ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Report on the 1st simulation for information retrieval workshop (Sim4IR 2021) at SIGIR 2021", 2021, ACM SIGIR Forum

Krisztian Balog has collaborated frequently with other researchers such as Filip Radlinski, Weronika Łajewska, Nolwenn Bernard, ChengXiang Zhai, and Vinay Setty. The number of co-authored works with these collaborators ranges from five to eight.

In addition to articles, Krisztian Balog has contributed to book publications. One notable book, "Advances in Information Retrieval," was published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2022 and has garnered significant citations.

Best Publications

  • Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora

    Krisztian Balog;Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke

  • Overview of the TREC 2010 Entity Track

    Krisztian Balog;Pavel Serdyukov;Arjen P. de Vries

  • A language modeling framework for expert finding

    Krisztian Balog;Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke

  • Expertise Retrieval

    Krisztian Balog;Yi Fang;Maarten de Rijke;Pavel Serdyukov

  • Determining expert profiles (with an application to expert finding)

    Krisztian Balog;Maarten De Rijke

  • Broad expertise retrieval in sparse data environments

    Krisztian Balog;Toine Bogers;Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke

  • Why are they excited?: identifying and explaining spikes in blog mood levels

    Krisztian Balog;Gilad Mishne;Maarten de Rijke

  • Building simulated queries for known-item topics: an analysis using six european languages

    Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke;Krisztian Balog

  • Overview of the TREC 2009 Entity Track

    Krisztian Balog;Arjen P. de Vries;Pavel Serdyukov;Paul Thomas

  • Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems via User Simulation

    Shuo Zhang;Krisztian Balog

  • Transparent, Scrutable and Explainable User Models for Personalized Recommendation

    Krisztian Balog;Filip Radlinski;Shushan Arakelyan

  • Finding experts and their eetails in e-mail corpora

    Krisztian Balog;Maarten de Rijke

  • REL: An Entity Linker Standing on the Shoulders of Giants

    Johannes M. van Hulst;Faegheh Hasibi;Koen Dercksen;Krisztian Balog

  • Ad Hoc Table Retrieval using Semantic Similarity

    Shuo Zhang;Krisztian Balog

  • Entity-Oriented Search

    Krisztian Balog

  • Web Table Extraction, Retrieval, and Augmentation: A Survey

    Shuo Zhang;Krisztian Balog

  • People search in the enterprise

    Krisztian Balog

  • A User-Oriented Model for Expert Finding

    Elena Smirnova;Krisztian Balog

  • Query modeling for entity search based on terms, categories, and examples

    Krisztian Balog;Marc Bron;Maarten De Rijke

  • Large Language Models are Competitive Near Cold-start Recommenders for Language- and Item-based Preferences

    Unknown

  • Overview of the TREC 2011 Entity Track.

    Krisztian Balog;Pavel Serdyukov;Arjen P. de Vries

  • DBpedia-Entity v2: A Test Collection for Entity Search

    Faegheh Hasibi;Fedor Nikolaev;Chenyan Xiong;Krisztian Balog

  • Coached Conversational Preference Elicitation: A Case Study in Understanding Movie Preferences

    Filip Radlinski;Krisztian Balog;Bill Byrne;Karthik Krishnamoorthi

Frequent Co-Authors

Maarten de Rijke
Maarten de Rijke University of Amsterdam
Kjetil Nørvåg
Kjetil Nørvåg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Leif Azzopardi
Leif Azzopardi University of Strathclyde
Pavel Serdyukov
Pavel Serdyukov Yandex (Russia)
Jamie Callan
Jamie Callan Carnegie Mellon University
Antal van den Bosch
Antal van den Bosch Radboud University
Filip Radlinski
Filip Radlinski Google (United States)
Martin Potthast
Martin Potthast Leipzig University
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is an excellent way for computer science students to expand career possibilities. Whether you’re interested in data-driven roles or management, there are flexible online options to consider.

For those aiming to specialize further, many universities now offer cheap online masters in data science. These programs allow you to gain in-demand analytical skills without breaking the bank.

If you want to pivot to a different sector, the online bachelor's in construction management can open doors to project management and operations roles in the growing construction industry.

Business-minded individuals may prefer pursuing one of the cheapest mba programs to develop leadership and strategic skills needed for tech-driven organizations.

For those seeking a fast-tracked credential, numerous 1 year online masters programs let you quickly gain new expertise and move up in your chosen career field.

Best Scientists Citing Krisztian Balog

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles