World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
89
Citations
35079
World Ranking
641
National Ranking
6

Maarten de Rijke publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten de Rijke sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 786 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maarten de Rijke D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten de Rijke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2017 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Maarten de Rijke is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their work is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Management Science and Operations Research, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's research addresses a range of topics, reflecting diverse interests within computational and information sciences. Some of the main topics they explore include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Maarten de Rijke has contributed to many research papers published in reputable venues. Some recent notable papers include:

  • "A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence" (2020, Computer)
  • "Challenges and research opportunities in eCommerce search and recommendations" (2020, ACM SIGIR Forum)
  • "Knowledge Graphs: An Information Retrieval Perspective" (2020, Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval)
  • "Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Distantly Supervised Global-to-Local Knowledge Selection for Background Based Conversation" (2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence)
  • "A Survey on Variational Autoencoders in Recommender Systems" (2024, ACM Computing Surveys)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Pengjie Ren
  • Zhaochun Ren
  • Zhumin Chen
  • Ruqing Zhang
  • Jiafeng Guo

Maarten de Rijke has published extensively in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, and ACM SIGIR Forum.

In 2017, the scientist was recognized by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Their ongoing research spans multiple aspects of artificial intelligence and information retrieval, contributing to the body of knowledge in computational sciences through varied topics and collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Modal logic

    Patrick Blackburn;Maarten de Rijke;Yde Venema

  • Using WordNet to measure semantic orientations of adjectives

    Jaap Kamps;Maarten Marx;Robert J. Mokken;Maarten de Rijke

  • Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora

    Krisztian Balog;Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke

  • Short Text Similarity with Word Embeddings

    Tom Kenter;Maarten de Rijke

  • Overview of the TREC 2006 Blog Track

    Iadh Ounis;Craig Macdonald;Maarten de Rijke;Gilad Mishne

  • Adding semantics to microblog posts

    Edgar Meij;Wouter Weerkamp;Maarten de Rijke

  • Accessing Multilingual Information Repositories

    Carol Peters;Fredric C. Gey;Julio Gonzalo;Henning Müller

  • Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

    James Bailey;Alistair Moffat;Charu C. Aggarwal;Maarten de Rijke

  • Click Models for Web Search

    Aleksandr Chuklin;Ilya Markov;Maarten de Rijke

  • A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

    Zeynep Akata;Dan Balliet;Maarten de Rijke;Frank Dignum

  • A language modeling framework for expert finding

    Krisztian Balog;Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke

  • Siamese CBOW: Optimizing Word Embeddings for Sentence Representations

    Tom Kenter;Alexey Borisov;Maarten de Rijke

  • Expertise Retrieval

    Krisztian Balog;Yi Fang;Maarten de Rijke;Pavel Serdyukov

  • ENSM-SE at CLEF 2006 : Fuzzy Proximity Method with an Adhoc Influence Function in Evaluation of Multilingual and Multi-modal Information Retrieval 7th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, CLEF 2006, Alicante, Spain

    Carol Peters;Paul Clough;Fredric C. Gey;Jussi Karlgren

  • Adding Semantics to Detectors for Video Retrieval

    C.G.M. Snoek;B. Huurnink;L. Hollink;M. de Rijke

  • RepeatNet: A Repeat Aware Neural Recommendation Machine for Session-Based Recommendation

    Pengjie Ren;Zhumin Chen;Jing Li;Zhaochun Ren

  • Advances and challenges in conversational recommender systems: A survey

    Chongming Gao;Wenqiang Lei;Xiangnan He;Maarten de Rijke

  • A Collaborative Session-based Recommendation Approach with Parallel Memory Modules

    Meirui Wang;Pengjie Ren;Lei Mei;Zhumin Chen

  • Incorporating query expansion and quality indicators in searching microblog posts

    Kamran Massoudi;Manos Tsagkias;Maarten de Rijke;Wouter Weerkamp

  • Discovering missing links in Wikipedia

    Sisay Fissaha Adafre;Maarten de Rijke

  • A study of blog search

    Gilad Mishne;Maarten de Rijke

  • Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    Gareth J.F. Jones;Páraic Sheridan;Diane Kelly;Maarten de Rijke

  • Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining

    Maarten de Rijke;Milad Shokouhi;Andrew Tomkins;Min Zhang

  • Modal Logic: Algebras and General Frames

    Patrick Blackburn;Maarten de Rijke;Yde Venema

  • Modal Logic: Models

    Patrick Blackburn;Maarten de Rijke;Yde Venema

Frequent Co-Authors

Krisztian Balog
Krisztian Balog University of Stavanger
Jaap Kamps
Jaap Kamps University of Amsterdam
Christof Monz
Christof Monz University of Amsterdam
Shimon Whiteson
Shimon Whiteson University of Oxford
Evangelos Kanoulas
Evangelos Kanoulas University of Amsterdam
Maarten Marx
Maarten Marx University of Amsterdam
Pavel Serdyukov
Pavel Serdyukov Yandex (Russia)
Leif Azzopardi
Leif Azzopardi University of Strathclyde
Julio Gonzalo
Julio Gonzalo National University of Distance Education
Bernardo Magnini
Bernardo Magnini Fondazione Bruno Kessler

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking beyond a traditional bachelor’s, students interested in computer science can explore a variety of online degree paths. For those looking to specialize or advance their knowledge, several cheap masters programs offer flexibility and significant cost savings without sacrificing quality.

Professionals aiming for leadership positions may consider the best online doctorate in organizational leadership to blend technical know-how with management expertise. If you’re seeking a quicker, entry-level credential, researching what's the easiest associate's degree to get can help you start your tech career sooner and with less financial investment.

Among universities providing affordable doctoral options, the university of north georgia stands out for its fully online Ed.D. programs, allowing educators and tech professionals to upskill on their own schedules. Whether your goal is to advance quickly or pursue long-term academic growth, these online degrees offer accessible routes into diverse computer science and tech-driven careers.

Best Scientists Citing Maarten de Rijke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles