World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6929
World Ranking
11986
National Ranking
211

Julio Gonzalo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julio Gonzalo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 186 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Julio Gonzalo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julio Gonzalo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julio Gonzalo is affiliated with the National University of Distance Education in Spain and contributes to the field of Computer Science, with a primary focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Literature and Literary Theory, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their work addresses key topics such as Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Topic Modeling, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Digital Communication and Language, Data Stream Mining Techniques, Advanced Text Analysis Techniques, and Natural Language Processing Techniques.

Julio Gonzalo has published research in various academic venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante)
  • IEEE Access
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • Information Retrieval

Recent representative papers include:

  • "Overview of EXIST 2021: sEXism Identification in Social neTworks" (2021), published in Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante)
  • "An Effectiveness Metric for Ordinal Classification: Formal Properties and Experimental Results" (2022), published in Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine)
  • "What is my Problem Identifying Formal Tasks and Metrics in Data Mining on the Basis of Measurement Theory" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • "On the foundations of similarity in information access" (2020), published in Information Retrieval
  • "Automated Metric Analysis of Spanish Poetry: Two Complementary Approaches" (2021), published in IEEE Access

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Jorge Carrillo-de-Albornoz
  • Laura Plaza
  • Enrique Amigó
  • Paolo Rosso
  • Stefano Mizzaro

Best Publications

  • A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints

    Enrique Amigó;Julio Gonzalo;Javier Artiles;Felisa Verdejo

  • Accessing Multilingual Information Repositories

    Carol Peters;Fredric C. Gey;Julio Gonzalo;Henning Müller

  • Indexing with WordNet synsets can improve text retrieval.

    Julio Gonzalo;Felisa Verdejo;Irina Chugur;Juan M. Cigarrán

  • The SemEval-2007 WePS Evaluation: Establishing a benchmark for the Web People Search Task

    Javier Artiles;Julio Gonzalo;Satoshi Sekine

  • Multilingual Information Access for Text, Speech and Images

    Carol Peters;Paul Clough;Julio Gonzalo;Gareth J. F. Jones

  • Evaluation of cross-language information retrieval systems

    Carol Peters;Martin Braschler;Julio Gonzalo;Michael Kluck

  • WePS 2 Evaluation Campaign: overview of the Web People Search ClusteringTask

    Javier Artiles;Julio Gonzalo;Satoshi Sekine

  • Advances in cross-language information retrieval

    Martin Braschler;Julio Gonzalo;Michael Kluck

  • Comparative Evaluation of Multilingual Information Access Systems

    Carol Peters;Julio Gonzalo;Martin Braschler;Michael Kluck

  • Overview of RepLab 2013: Evaluating Online Reputation Monitoring Systems

    Enrique Amigó;Jorge Carrillo De Albornoz;Irina Chugur;Adolfo Corujo

  • Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access

    Carol Peters;Thomas Deselaers;Nicola Ferro;Julio Gonzalo

  • A general evaluation measure for document organization tasks

    Enrique Amigó;Julio Gonzalo;Felisa Verdejo

  • Towards real-time summarization of scheduled events from twitter streams

    Arkaitz Zubiaga;Damiano Spina;Enrique Amigó;Julio Gonzalo

  • A testbed for people searching strategies in the WWW

    Javier Artiles;Julio Gonzalo;Felisa Verdejo

  • Applying EuroWordNet to cross-language text retrieval

    Julio Gonzalo;Felisa Verdejo;Carol Peters;Nicoletta Calzolari

  • WePS-3 Evaluation Campaign: Overview of the Web People Search Clustering and Attribute Extraction Tasks.

    Javier Artiles;Andrew Borthwick;Julio Gonzalo;Satoshi Sekine

  • Overview of RepLab 2014: Author Profiling and Reputation Dimensions for Online Reputation Management

    Enrique Amigó;Jorge Carrillo-de-Albornoz;Irina Chugur;Adolfo Corujo

  • Overview of RepLab 2012: Evaluating Online Reputation Management Systems

    E. Amigó;A. Corujo;J. Gonzalo;E. Meij

  • WePS3 Evaluation Campaign: Overview of the On-line Reputation Management Task.

    Enrique Amigó;Javier Artiles;Julio Gonzalo;Damiano Spina

  • An Approach to Conceptual Text Retrieval Using the EuroWordNet Multilingual Semantic Database

    Julio Gilarranz;Julio Gonzalo;Felisa Verdejo

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Clough
Paul Clough University of Sheffield
Maarten de Rijke
Maarten de Rijke University of Amsterdam
Gareth J. F. Jones
Gareth J. F. Jones Dublin City University
Bernardo Magnini
Bernardo Magnini Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Douglas W. Oard
Douglas W. Oard University of Maryland, College Park
Piek Vossen
Piek Vossen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mark Sanderson
Mark Sanderson RMIT University
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Thomas Deselaers
Thomas Deselaers Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens the door to a range of specialized and flexible education options. For students prioritizing affordability, consider programs like the cheapest data science masters in usa, which provide quality education while keeping costs manageable.

Online engineering degrees are another strong choice, especially for those interested in diverse career opportunities. Graduates with an online electrical engineering background can expect promising online electrical engineering career outcomes, ranging from technology development to energy sector roles.

If you're seeking a quick entry into the tech job market, there are short certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can often be completed in a few months and offer immediate career advancement in areas like IT support or cybersecurity.

For those focused on earning an advanced degree quickly, some universities offer the shortest masters degree programs online, allowing students to complete their studies in just 12 to 18 months.

Best Scientists Citing Julio Gonzalo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles