World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7598
World Ranking
7999
National Ranking
3440

Ramesh Johari publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramesh Johari sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ramesh Johari D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramesh Johari sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ramesh Johari is a researcher affiliated with Stanford University in the United States, with a focus primarily on the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Management Science and Operations Research, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Marketing, Surgery, and Genetics.

Their research covers a range of main topics, notably:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: the Pilot 4T Study" (2021) published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • "Managing Congestion in Matching Markets" (2021) published in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
  • "Always Valid Inference: Continuous Monitoring of A/B Tests" (2021) published in Operations Research
  • "Population-level management of type 1 diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring and algorithm-enabled patient prioritization: Precision health meets population health" (2021) published in Pediatric Diabetes
  • "Studying Undergraduate Course Consideration at Scale" (2021) published in AERA Open

Johari's frequent co-authors include:

  • David Scheinker
  • David M. Maahs
  • Priya Prahalad
  • Johannes O. Ferstad
  • Dessi P. Zaharieva

Their publications are often found in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Operations Research
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

In addition to journal papers, Johari has contributed to book publications. One example is a book published by Frontiers Media titled Developing Strategies to Improve Diabetes Management in College-Going Young Adults, published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: evidence from a large video streaming service

    Te-Yuan Huang;Ramesh Johari;Nick McKeown;Matthew Trunnell

  • Efficiency Loss in a Network Resource Allocation Game

    Ramesh Johari;John N. Tsitsiklis

  • End-to-end congestion control for the internet: delays and stability

    Ramesh Johari;David Kim Hong Tan

  • Carving research slices out of your production networks with OpenFlow

    Rob Sherwood;Michael Chan;Adam Covington;Glen Gibb

  • Confused, timid, and unstable: picking a video streaming rate is hard

    Te-Yuan Huang;Nikhil Handigol;Brandon Heller;Nick McKeown

  • Pricing in Ride-Share Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach

    Siddhartha Banerjee;Carlos Riquelme;Ramesh Johari

  • Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach

    Siddhartha Banerjee;Ramesh Johari;Carlos Riquelme

  • How many tiers?: pricing in the internet transit market

    Vytautas Valancius;Cristian Lumezanu;Nick Feamster;Ramesh Johari

  • Efficiency of Scalar-Parameterized Mechanisms

    Ramesh Johari;John N. Tsitsiklis

  • Peeking at A/B Tests: Why it matters, and what to do about it

    Ramesh Johari;Pete Koomen;Leonid Pekelis;David Walsh

  • Equilibria of dynamic games with many players: Existence, approximation, and market structure

    Sachin Adlakha;Ramesh Johari;Grabriel Y. Weintraub

  • Downton abbey without the hiccups: buffer-based rate adaptation for HTTP video streaming

    Te-Yuan Huang;Ramesh Johari;Nick McKeown

  • Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game: the case of elastic supply

    R. Johari;S. Mannor;J.N. Tsitsiklis

  • Mean Field Equilibrium in Dynamic Games with Strategic Complementarities

    Sachin Adlakha;Ramesh Johari

  • A contract-based model for directed network formation

    Ramesh Johari;Shie Mannor;John N. Tsitsiklis

  • Information-Theoretic Operating Regimes of Large Wireless Networks

    A. Ozgur;R. Johari;D.N.C. Tse;O. Leveque

  • A scalable network resource allocation mechanism with bounded efficiency loss

    R. Johari;J.N. Tsitsiklis

  • Implications of autonomy for the expressiveness of policy routing

    Nick Feamster;Ramesh Johari;Hari Balakrishnan

  • Traffic Engineering vs. Content Distribution: A Game Theoretic Perspective

    D. DiPalantino;R. Johari

  • Network Formation: Bilateral Contracting and Myopic Dynamics

    E. Arcaute;R. Johari;S. Mannor

  • Always Valid Inference: Bringing Sequential Analysis to A/B Testing

    Ramesh Johari;Leo Pekelis;David J. Walsh

  • Experimental Design in Two-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of Bias

    Ramesh Johari;Hannah Li;Inessa Liskovich;Gabriel Weintraub

Frequent Co-Authors

Shie Mannor
Shie Mannor Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Sanjay Shakkottai
Sanjay Shakkottai The University of Texas at Austin
Ram Rajagopal
Ram Rajagopal Stanford University
Nick Feamster
Nick Feamster University of Chicago
Baosen Zhang
Baosen Zhang University of Washington
Nick McKeown
Nick McKeown Stanford University
Michael J. Freedman
Michael J. Freedman Princeton University
Andrea Goldsmith
Andrea Goldsmith Stony Brook University
Vijay V. Vazirani
Vijay V. Vazirani University of California, Irvine
David Tse
David Tse Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to several complementary technology fields. Many students interested in tech also consider online degree programs in related areas, such as engineering, physics, and data science. These paths can help broaden your career opportunities and skill set.

For those focused on engineering, comparing mechanical engineering degree online cost and electrical engineering online tuition costs is essential. Understanding the investment required aids in making informed education and financial decisions.

If you’re passionate about the scientific side of technology, a bachelor of science in physics online provides a strong foundation in advanced problem-solving. Meanwhile, the demand for big data skills continues to rise, and seeking the cheapest data science degree online can be a great way to break into the growing analytics job market.

No matter your chosen pathway, researching program costs, course offerings, and career prospects will help you make the best choice for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Ramesh Johari

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles