World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 56 4136 4021 1954 1887 373 10508

Douglas W. Oard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Douglas W. Oard between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Douglas W. Oard published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2008. 17 of the 388 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2008. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
1994 2025

388 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Douglas W. Oard: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 2
1996 3
1997 7
1998 11
1999 4
2000 14
2001 17
2002 9
2003 22
2004 13
2005 12
2006 21
2007 13
2008 23
2009 23
2010 10
2011 8
2012 15
2013 22
2014 13
2015 16
2016 10
2017 9
2018 4
2019 10
2020 17
2021 18
2022 15
2023 7
2024 9
2025 8
Total 388
Download as CSV

Douglas W. Oard publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas W. Oard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 372–381 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 373 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127 373
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Douglas W. Oard D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas W. Oard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458 56
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Douglas W. Oard is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research principally spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their work addresses various topics within their disciplines, notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Douglas W. Oard has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
  • Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
  • Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management

Recent papers include:

  • "C3: Continued Pretraining with Contrastive Weak Supervision for Cross Language Ad-Hoc Retrieval" (2022), Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
  • "Towards Clinical Encounter Summarization: Learning to Compose Discharge Summaries from Prior Notes" (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Providing More Efficient Access to Government Records: A Use Case Involving Application of Machine Learning to Improve FOIA Review for the Deliberative Process Privilege" (2022), Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
  • "Contextualized Formula Search Using Math Abstract Meaning Representation" (2022), Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
  • "Search with Discretion" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Collaboration forms a significant part of their work, with frequent co-authors including Eugene Yang, Dawn Lawrie, James Mayfield, Richard Zanibbi, and Behrooz Mansouri. These collaborations indicate a network spanning expertise in related computing disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Implicit Feedback for Recommender Systems

    Douglas W Oard;Jinmook Kim

  • A survey of information retrieval and filtering methods

    Christos Faloutsos;Douglas W. Oard

  • Pairwise Document Similarity in Large Collections with MapReduce

    Tamer Elsayed;Jimmy Lin;Douglas Oard

  • Cross-Language Information Retrieval.

    Douglas W. Oard;Anne R. Diekema

  • ENSM-SE at CLEF 2006 : Fuzzy Proximity Method with an Adhoc Influence Function in Evaluation of Multilingual and Multi-modal Information Retrieval 7th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, CLEF 2006, Alicante, Spain

    Carol Peters;Paul Clough;Fredric C. Gey;Jussi Karlgren

  • Confidentiality-preserving rank-ordered search

    Ashwin Swaminathan;Yinian Mao;Guan-Ming Su;Hongmei Gou

  • Advances in Multilingual and Multimodal Information Retrieval

    Carol Peters;Valentin Jijkoun;Thomas Mandl;Henning Müller

  • Textual Data Mining to Support Science and Technology Management

    Paul Losiewicz;Douglas W. Oard;Ronald N. Kostoff

  • A survey of multilingual text retrieval

    Douglas W. Oard;Bonnie J. Dorr

  • The State of the Art in Text Filtering

    Douglas W. Oard

  • Modeling Information Content Using Observable Behavior

    Douglas W Oard;Jinmook Kim

  • A Comparative Study of Query and Document Translation for Cross-Language Information Retrieval

    Douglas W. Oard

  • A Conceptual Framework for Text Filtering Process

    Douglas W. Oard;Gary Marchionini

  • Automatic recognition of spontaneous speech for access to multilingual oral history archives

    W. Byrne;D. Doermann;M. Franz;S. Gustman

  • Dictionary-based techniques for cross-language information retrieval

    Gina-Anne Levow;Douglas W. Oard;Philip Resnik

  • Alternative Approaches for Cross-Language Text Retrieval

    Douglas W. Oard

  • Probabilistic structured query methods

    Kareem Darwish;Douglas W. Oard

  • CLEF Experiments at Maryland: Statistical Stemming and Backoff Translation

    Douglas W. Oard;Gina-Anne Levow;Clara I. Cabezas

  • Serving Users in Many Languages: Cross-Language Information Retrievalfor Digital Libraries

    Douglas W. Oard

  • The Multilingual TEDx Corpus for Speech Recognition and Translation

    Elizabeth Salesky;Matthew Wiesner;Jacob Bremerman;Roldano Cattoni

  • Overview of the CLEF-2006 cross-language speech retrieval track

    Douglas W. Oard;Jianqiang Wang;Gareth J. F. Jones;Ryen W. White

  • Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Mari Ostendorf;Michael Collins;Shri Narayanan;Douglas W. Oard

  • Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    Tat-Seng Chua;Mun-Kew Leong;Syung Hyon Myaeng;Douglas W. Oard

Frequent Co-Authors

Bonnie J. Dorr
Bonnie J. Dorr University of Florida
Dagobert Soergel
Dagobert Soergel University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Philip Resnik
Philip Resnik University of Maryland, College Park
David Doermann
David Doermann University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jimmy Lin
Jimmy Lin University of Waterloo
Dina Demner-Fushman
Dina Demner-Fushman National Institutes of Health
Sanjeev Khudanpur
Sanjeev Khudanpur Johns Hopkins University
Kareem Darwish
Kareem Darwish Hamad bin Khalifa University
Bhuvana Ramabhadran
Bhuvana Ramabhadran Google (United States)
Julio Gonzalo
Julio Gonzalo National University of Distance Education

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up numerous academic and career opportunities. Many students consider it among the top 10 best majors for the future due to strong job prospects and high earning potential. However, Computer Science skills also complement other in-demand fields, offering flexibility for career shifts or interdisciplinary roles.

For graduates seeking to expand their expertise, pursuing an easy masters degree might be a practical way to boost qualifications without a heavy workload. Additionally, ambitious professionals interested in teaching or research often look for the most affordable online doctoral programs to minimize costs while advancing their careers.

Those aiming for educational leadership can benefit from accelerated edd programs online that offer fast-track pathways to earn advanced degrees in a shorter time frame. Each of these options helps students and professionals tailor their education to changing industry demands and personal goals.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas W. Oard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles