World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4999
World Ranking
13083
National Ranking
253

Franciska de Jong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franciska de Jong sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Franciska de Jong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franciska de Jong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Improving cyberbullying detection with user context

    Maral Dadvar;Dolf Trieschnigg;Roeland Ordelman;Franciska de Jong

  • Exploiting emoticons in sentiment analysis

    Alexander Hogenboom;Daniella Bal;Flavius Frasincar;Malissa Bal

  • Computational sociolinguistics: A survey

    Dong Nguyen;A. Seza Doğruöz;Carolyn P. Rosé;Franciska de Jong

  • Improved cyberbullying detection using gender information

    Maral Dadvar;Franciska de Jong;Roeland Ordelman;Dolf Trieschnigg

  • A survey of pre-retrieval query performance predictors

    Claudia Hauff;Djoerd Hiemstra;Franciska de Jong

  • Care more about customers: Unsupervised domain-independent aspect detection for sentiment analysis of customer reviews

    Ayoub Bagheri;Mohamad Saraee;Franciska De Jong

  • Polarity analysis of texts using discourse structure

    Bas Heerschop;Frank Goossen;Alexander Hogenboom;Flavius Frasincar

  • Experts and Machines against Bullies: A Hybrid Approach to Detect Cyberbullies

    Maral Dadvar;Dolf Trieschnigg;Franciska de Jong

  • A Survey of event extraction methods from text for decision support systems

    Frederik Hogenboom;Flavius Frasincar;Uzay Kaymak;Franciska de Jong

  • Why Gender and Age Prediction from Tweets is Hard: Lessons from a Crowdsourcing Experiment

    Dong Nguyen;Dolf Trieschnigg;A. Seza Doğruöz;Rilana Gravel

  • Cyberbullying detection: a step toward a safer internet yard

    Maral Dadvar;Franciska de Jong

  • Multi-lingual support for lexicon-based sentiment analysis guided by semantics

    Alexander Hogenboom;Bas Heerschop;Flavius Frasincar;Uzay Kaymak

  • MeSH Up

    Dolf Trieschnigg;Piotr Pezik;Vivian Lee;Franciska de Jong

  • Disambiguation Strategies for Cross-Language Information Retrieval

    Djoerd Hiemstra;Franciska de Jong

  • Temporal Language Models for the Disclosure of Historical Text

    F.M.G. de Jong;H. Rode;D. Hiemstra

  • Annotation of heterogeneous multimedia content using automatic speech recognition

    Marijn Huijbregts;Roeland Ordelman;Franciska de Jong

  • Exploiting emoticons in polarity classification of text

    Alexander Hogenboom;Danella Bal;Flavius Frasincar;Malissa Bal

  • Scope of negation detection in sentiment analysis

    Maral Dadvar;Claudia Hauff;Franciska de Jong

  • Using rhetorical structure in sentiment analysis

    Alexander Hogenboom;Flavius Frasincar;Franciska de Jong;Uzay Kaymak

  • TwNC: a Multifaceted Dutch News Corpus

    Roeland J.F. Ordelman;Franciska M.G. de Jong;Adrianus J. van Hessen;G.H.W. Hondorp

Frequent Co-Authors

Djoerd Hiemstra
Djoerd Hiemstra Radboud University
Wessel Kraaij
Wessel Kraaij Leiden University
Flavius Frasincar
Flavius Frasincar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Uzay Kaymak
Uzay Kaymak Eindhoven University of Technology
Martha Larson
Martha Larson Radboud University
Leif Azzopardi
Leif Azzopardi University of Strathclyde
Noel E. O'Connor
Noel E. O'Connor Dublin City University
Arjen P. de Vries
Arjen P. de Vries Radboud University
Douglas W. Oard
Douglas W. Oard University of Maryland, College Park
Gerben Johan Westerhof
Gerben Johan Westerhof University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Franciska de Jong

Recently Published Articles