World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
7894
World Ranking
6558
National Ranking
2900

Ronald N. Kostoff publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald N. Kostoff sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ronald N. Kostoff D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald N. Kostoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald N. Kostoff is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States and has contributed extensively to research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work focuses on several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Immunology, Modeling and Simulation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, as well as Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of topics related to COVID-19 and broader health impacts. These topics include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Immune responses and vaccinations, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity.

A selection of recent papers highlights the research scope and publication venues:

  • Towards effective COVID-19 vaccines: Updates, perspectives and challenges (Review), 2020, International Journal of Molecular Medicine
  • COVID-19 in Northern Italy: An integrative overview of factors possibly influencing the sharp increase of the outbreak (Review), 2020, Molecular Medicine Reports
  • Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions, 2020, Toxicology Letters
  • COVID-19, an opportunity to reevaluate the correlation between long-term effects of anthropogenic pollutants on viral epidemic/pandemic events and prevalence, 2020, Food and Chemical Toxicology
  • Improved strategies to counter the COVID-19 pandemic: Lockdowns vs. primary and community healthcare, 2020, Toxicology Reports

Frequent collaborators in research include Aristidis Tsatsakis, Michael B. Briggs, Alan L. Porter, Daniela Călina, and Michael Aschner. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications alongside Kostoff.

Articles featuring Ronald N. Kostoff have been published in several scientific venues, with repeat publications in Toxicology Reports and Food and Chemical Toxicology. Other notable journals include the International Journal of Molecular Medicine, Molecular Medicine Reports, and Toxicology Letters.

Best Publications

  • Science and technology roadmaps

    R.N. Kostoff;R.R. Schaller

  • Disruptive technology roadmaps

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Robert Boylan;Gene R. Simons

  • Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery

    Ronald N. Kostoff

  • Towards effective COVID­19 vaccines: Updates, perspectives and challenges (Review).

    Daniela Calina;Anca Oana Docea;Demetrios Petrakis;Alex M. Egorov

  • The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation

    Ronald N. Kostoff

  • Textual Data Mining to Support Science and Technology Management

    Paul Losiewicz;Douglas W. Oard;Ronald N. Kostoff

  • The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Jesse A. Stump;Dustin Johnson;James S. Murday;James S. Murday

  • Text mining using database tomography and bibliometrics: A review

    Ronald N Kostoff;Darrell Ray Toothman;Henry J Eberhart;James A Humenik

  • Global nanotechnology research literature overview

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Raymond G. Koytcheff;Clifford G.Y. Lau

  • Citation mining: Integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling

    Ronald N. Kostoff;J. Antonio del Río;James A. Humenik;Esther Ofilia García

  • Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions.

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Paul Heroux;Michael Aschner;Aristides Tsatsakis

  • Database tomography for information retrieval

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Henry J. Eberhart;Darrell Ray Toothman

  • Database tomography for technical intelligence: a roadmap of the near-earth space science and technology literature

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Henry J. Eberhart;Darrell Ray Toothman

  • System and method for database tomography

    Ronald N. Kostoff;David L. Miles;Henry J. Eberhart

  • Power source roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography

    R. N. Kostoff;R. Tshiteya;K. M. Pfeil;J. A. Humenik

  • Science and technology innovation

    Ronald N. Kostoff

  • Citation analysis of research performer quality

    Ronald N. Kostoff

  • Literature-Related Discovery (LRD): Introduction and background

    Ronald N. Kostoff

  • Global nanotechnology research metrics

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Raymond G. Koytcheff;Clifford G. Y. Lau

  • The role of toxic stimuli combinations in determining safe exposure limits

    Ronald N. Kostoff;Marina Goumenou;Aristidis Tsatsakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Aristidis Tsatsakis
Aristidis Tsatsakis University of Crete
Alan L. Porter
Alan L. Porter Georgia Institute of Technology
Tibor Braun
Tibor Braun Eötvös Loránd University
Michael Aschner
Michael Aschner Albert Einstein College of Medicine
András Schubert
András Schubert Hungarian Academy of Sciences
George Karypis
George Karypis University of Minnesota
Demetrios A. Spandidos
Demetrios A. Spandidos University of Crete
Daniela Calina
Daniela Calina University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova
Michael Pecht
Michael Pecht University of Maryland, College Park
Michael F. Shlesinger
Michael F. Shlesinger Office of Naval Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens doors to a variety of related degrees and career paths. For those seeking a quick entry into tech, associates degrees offer foundational knowledge and practical skills that can be completed in just two years, ideal for early career changers.

If leadership roles in education technology or administration interest you, consider an online ed.d educational leadership program. These advanced degrees can position graduates for high-level roles in schools, universities, and edtech companies.

It’s important to choose a reputable institution. Enroll at one of the highly accredited online universities to ensure that your degree is recognized and valued by employers nationwide.

For those interested in creative fields, pursuing a game design masters online offers specialized knowledge in gaming technology and digital storytelling—a sector projecting rapid growth in coming years.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald N. Kostoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles