World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
51
Citations
10859
World Ranking
941
National Ranking
138

David Probert publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Probert sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 216 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

David Probert D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Probert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

David Probert is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile does not list any recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues, indicating limited publicly available bibliographic details at this time.

There is no specific information about David Probert's main fields or subfields of study, nor a listing of primary research topics. This absence suggests either an early stage in their research publication record or a focus in areas without extensive bibliometric documentation.

There are no recorded book publications or awards associated with David Probert. The lack of citations and references to published papers also means detailed insight into their research contributions, thematic focus, or collaborative networks is currently unavailable.

Despite the limited public data, David Probert's connection to a prominent institution such as the University of Cambridge suggests association with a research environment that supports academic rigor and scientific inquiry. Additional information on their scholarly activities or publication output may emerge in the future as their career progresses.

Best Publications

  • Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution

    Robert Phaal;Clare J.P. Farrukh;David R. Probert

  • A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice

    Imoh M. Ilevbare;David Probert;Robert Phaal

  • Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities

    Dilek Cetindamar;Robert Phaal;David Probert

  • A framework for mapping industrial emergence

    R. Phaal;E. O'Sullivan;M. Routley;S. Ford

  • Technology management tools: concept, development and application

    Robert Phaal;Clare J.P. Farrukh;David R. Probert

  • Customizing roadmapping

    R. Phaal;C. Farrukh;D. Probert

  • Developing a framework for make‐or‐buy decisions

    L.E. Cánez;K.W. Platts;D.R. Probert

  • Developing a technology roadmapping system

    R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert

  • A framework for supporting the management of technological knowledge

    Robert Phaal;Clare J.P. Farrukh;David R Probert

  • Strategic Roadmapping: A Workshop-based Approach for Identifying and Exploring Strategic Issues and Opportunities

    R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert

  • Starting-up roadmapping fast

    R. Phaal;C. Farrukh;R. Mitchell;D. Probert

  • From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework

    Noordin Shehabuddeen;David Probert;Robert Phaal

  • Morphology analysis for technology roadmapping: application of text mining

    Byungun Yoon;Rob Phaal;David Probert

  • A conceptual model for technology intelligence

    C.I.V. Kerr;L. Mortara;R. Phaal;D.R. Probert

  • Characterisation of technology roadmaps: purpose and format

    R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert

  • Technology Management: Activities and Tools

    Dilek Çetindamar;Robert Phaal;David Probert

  • Roadmapping for Strategy and Innovation: Aligning Technology and Markets in a Dynamic World

    Rob Phaal;C. J. P. Farrukh;David Probert

  • Technology management process assessment: a case study

    R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert

  • Beyond absorptive capacity in open innovation process: the relationships between openness, capacities and firm performance

    Joon Mo Ahn;Yonghan Ju;Tae Hee Moon;Timothy Herbert Minshall

  • Development of a Design Audit Tool for SMEs

    James Moultrie;P. John Clarkson;David Probert

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Phaal
Robert Phaal University of Cambridge
Elizabeth Garnsey
Elizabeth Garnsey University of Cambridge
Mike Gregory
Mike Gregory University of Cambridge
Cornelius Herstatt
Cornelius Herstatt Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Sungjoo Lee
Sungjoo Lee Seoul National University
Ken Platts
Ken Platts University of Cambridge
Keith Goffin
Keith Goffin Cranfield University
Byungun Yoon
Byungun Yoon Dongguk University
P. John Clarkson
P. John Clarkson University of Cambridge
So Young Sohn
So Young Sohn Yonsei University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up new opportunities for students and professionals looking to advance in Business and Management. Today, a variety of quality programs cater to different interests, backgrounds, and career goals—all with the convenience and flexibility of remote learning.

Finance-driven students may consider an accounting degree online for foundational skills that are in high demand across multiple industries. Meanwhile, technology enthusiasts can delve into an online ai degree to explore the integration of artificial intelligence in modern business strategies.

Those interested in project oversight and leadership can pursue the best online construction management degree, which opens doors in the dynamic construction and real estate sectors. For experienced professionals aiming for top executive roles, an affordable online executive mba can significantly boost leadership prospects.

Selecting the right program involves considering affordability, curriculum relevance, and industry connections to maximize your educational investment and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing David Probert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles