| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business and Management | 51 | 941 | 877 | 138 | 122 | 216 | 10859 |
The chart shows the history of publications by David Probert between 1993 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Probert published across 27 years, from 1993 to 2019, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2007. 2 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.
219 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1997 | 8 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 7 |
| 2000 | 7 |
| 2001 | 9 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2004 | 16 |
| 2005 | 11 |
| 2006 | 14 |
| 2007 | 18 |
| 2008 | 12 |
| 2009 | 17 |
| 2010 | 16 |
| 2011 | 12 |
| 2012 | 13 |
| 2013 | 16 |
| 2014 | 7 |
| 2015 | 8 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 2 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| Total | 219 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Probert sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 216 publications — 79th percentile
79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 35–39 | 2 | |
| 40–44 | 2 | |
| 45–49 | 5 | |
| 50–54 | 20 | |
| 55–59 | 39 | |
| 60–64 | 66 | |
| 65–69 | 52 | |
| 70–74 | 80 | |
| 75–79 | 83 | |
| 80–84 | 116 | |
| 85–89 | 94 | |
| 90–94 | 111 | |
| 95–99 | 122 | |
| 100–104 | 104 | |
| 105–109 | 113 | |
| 110–114 | 96 | |
| 115–119 | 97 | |
| 120–124 | 112 | |
| 125–129 | 93 | |
| 130–134 | 79 | |
| 135–139 | 69 | |
| 140–144 | 80 | |
| 145–149 | 81 | |
| 150–154 | 85 | |
| 155–159 | 50 | |
| 160–164 | 74 | |
| 165–169 | 61 | |
| 170–174 | 40 | |
| 175–179 | 44 | |
| 180–184 | 47 | |
| 185–189 | 59 | |
| 190–194 | 35 | |
| 195–199 | 37 | |
| 200–204 | 49 | |
| 205–209 | 48 | |
| 210–214 | 34 | |
| 215–219 | 31 | 216 |
| 220–224 | 37 | |
| 225–229 | 34 | |
| 230–234 | 25 | |
| 235–239 | 28 | |
| 240–244 | 34 | |
| 245–249 | 28 | |
| 250–254 | 23 | |
| 255–259 | 22 | |
| 260–264 | 11 | |
| 265–269 | 16 | |
| 270–274 | 23 | |
| 275–279 | 12 | |
| 280–284 | 16 | |
| 285–289 | 10 | |
| 290–294 | 12 | |
| 295–299 | 12 | |
| 300–304 | 8 | |
| 305–309 | 13 | |
| 310–314 | 13 | |
| 315–319 | 6 | |
| 320–324 | 10 | |
| 325–329 | 9 | |
| 330–334 | 7 | |
| 335–339 | 10 | |
| 340–344 | 10 | |
| 345–349 | 7 | |
| 350–354 | 4 | |
| 355–359 | 10 | |
| 360–364 | 3 | |
| 365–369 | 7 | |
| 370–374 | 2 | |
| 375–379 | 8 | |
| 380–384 | 4 | |
| 385–389 | 5 | |
| 390–394 | 5 | |
| 395–399 | 2 | |
| 400–404 | 2 | |
| 405–409 | 4 | |
| 410–414 | 3 | |
| 415–419 | 2 | |
| 420–424 | 5 | |
| 425–429 | 3 | |
| 430–434 | 1 | |
| 435 | 1 | |
| 436+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Probert sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 51 D-Index — 71st percentile
71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 156 | |
| 31 | 159 | |
| 32 | 171 | |
| 33 | 161 | |
| 34 | 135 | |
| 35 | 124 | |
| 36 | 114 | |
| 37 | 111 | |
| 38 | 103 | |
| 39 | 89 | |
| 40 | 81 | |
| 41 | 97 | |
| 42 | 80 | |
| 43 | 69 | |
| 44 | 68 | |
| 45 | 63 | |
| 46 | 54 | |
| 47 | 69 | |
| 48 | 50 | |
| 49 | 58 | |
| 50 | 54 | |
| 51 | 62 | 51 |
| 52 | 54 | |
| 53 | 43 | |
| 54 | 49 | |
| 55 | 35 | |
| 56 | 40 | |
| 57 | 44 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 29 | |
| 60 | 48 | |
| 61 | 32 | |
| 62 | 30 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 22 | |
| 65 | 19 | |
| 66 | 20 | |
| 67 | 18 | |
| 68 | 17 | |
| 69 | 21 | |
| 70 | 20 | |
| 71 | 19 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 10 | |
| 74 | 16 | |
| 75 | 24 | |
| 76 | 13 | |
| 77 | 19 | |
| 78 | 8 | |
| 79 | 6 | |
| 80 | 4 | |
| 81 | 12 | |
| 82 | 7 | |
| 83 | 7 | |
| 84 | 6 | |
| 85 | 10 | |
| 86 | 4 | |
| 87 | 11 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89+ | 96 |
David Probert is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile does not list any recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues, indicating limited publicly available bibliographic details at this time.
There is no specific information about David Probert's main fields or subfields of study, nor a listing of primary research topics. This absence suggests either an early stage in their research publication record or a focus in areas without extensive bibliometric documentation.
There are no recorded book publications or awards associated with David Probert. The lack of citations and references to published papers also means detailed insight into their research contributions, thematic focus, or collaborative networks is currently unavailable.
Despite the limited public data, David Probert's connection to a prominent institution such as the University of Cambridge suggests association with a research environment that supports academic rigor and scientific inquiry. Additional information on their scholarly activities or publication output may emerge in the future as their career progresses.
Robert Phaal;Clare J.P. Farrukh;David R. Probert
Imoh M. Ilevbare;David Probert;Robert Phaal
Dilek Cetindamar;Robert Phaal;David Probert
R. Phaal;E. O'Sullivan;M. Routley;S. Ford
Robert Phaal;Clare J.P. Farrukh;David R. Probert
R. Phaal;C. Farrukh;D. Probert
L.E. Cánez;K.W. Platts;D.R. Probert
R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert
Robert Phaal;Clare J.P. Farrukh;David R Probert
R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert
R. Phaal;C. Farrukh;R. Mitchell;D. Probert
Noordin Shehabuddeen;David Probert;Robert Phaal
Byungun Yoon;Rob Phaal;David Probert
C.I.V. Kerr;L. Mortara;R. Phaal;D.R. Probert
R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert
Dilek Çetindamar;Robert Phaal;David Probert
Rob Phaal;C. J. P. Farrukh;David Probert
R. Phaal;C.J.P. Farrukh;D.R. Probert
Joon Mo Ahn;Yonghan Ju;Tae Hee Moon;Timothy Herbert Minshall
James Moultrie;P. John Clarkson;David Probert
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring online education opens up new opportunities for students and professionals looking to advance in Business and Management. Today, a variety of quality programs cater to different interests, backgrounds, and career goals—all with the convenience and flexibility of remote learning.
Finance-driven students may consider an accounting degree online for foundational skills that are in high demand across multiple industries. Meanwhile, technology enthusiasts can delve into an online ai degree to explore the integration of artificial intelligence in modern business strategies.
Those interested in project oversight and leadership can pursue the best online construction management degree, which opens doors in the dynamic construction and real estate sectors. For experienced professionals aiming for top executive roles, an affordable online executive mba can significantly boost leadership prospects.
Selecting the right program involves considering affordability, curriculum relevance, and industry connections to maximize your educational investment and career advancement.
Technical University of Denmark
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science
Cornell University
University of Geneva
University of Oregon
University of California, Irvine
University of Iowa
Emory University
University of California, Davis
Yale University
National Research Council (CNR)
American Enterprise Institute
University of Hong Kong
Qingdao University
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Grenoble Alpes University
