World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
7128
World Ranking
9690
National Ranking
282

Antonia Bertolino publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonia Bertolino sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 270 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antonia Bertolino D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonia Bertolino sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonia Bertolino is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy and has a focus in computer science with a substantial volume of research contributions. Their academic work prominently addresses software-related fields and methodologies.

The researcher's publication history spans several key venues known for software engineering and computing research. Frequent publication venues include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of Software Evolution and Process, Journal of Systems and Software, and Information and Software Technology.

Research fields that define Antonia Bertolino's work consist primarily of:

  • Computer Science

Their subfields highlight specialization in:

  • Software
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Main topics of research include:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies

The most recent papers authored or co-authored by Antonia Bertolino cover areas such as test flakiness prediction, field-based testing techniques, continuous reliability testing in DevOps, regression testing, and flakiness localization in web applications. Notable works include:

  • "Know You Neighbor: Fast Static Prediction of Test Flakiness" (2021, IEEE Access)
  • "A Survey of Field-based Testing Techniques" (2021, ACM Computing Surveys)
  • "DevOpRET: Continuous reliability testing in DevOps" (2020, Journal of Software Evolution and Process)
  • "State of Practical Applicability of Regression Testing Research: A Live Systematic Literature Review" (2023, ACM Computing Surveys)
  • "FlakyLoc: Flakiness Localization for Reliable Test Suites in Web Applications" (2020, Journal of Web Engineering)

Frequent collaborators in research projects include Guglielmo De Angelis, Jesús Morán, Claudio de la Riva, Javier Tuya, and Breno Miranda, each having multiple co-authored works with Bertolino. This network reflects interdisciplinary and collaborative engagement within software engineering and related domains.

Best Publications

  • Software Testing Research: Achievements, Challenges, Dreams

    A. Bertolino

  • WS-TAXI: A WSDL-based Testing Tool for Web Services

    Cesare Bartolini;Antonia Bertolino;Eda Marchetti;Andrea Polini

  • Using spanning sets for coverage testing

    M. Marre;A. Bertolino

  • Automatic synthesis of behavior protocols for composable web-services

    Antonia Bertolino;Paola Inverardi;Patrizio Pelliccione;Massimo Tivoli

  • PLUTO: A test methodology for product families

    Antonia Bertolino;Stefania Gnesi

  • Automatic generation of path covers based on the control flow analysis of computer programs

    A. Bertolino;M. Marre

  • Using software architecture for code testing

    H. Muccini;P. Inverardi;A. Bertolino

  • On the use of testability measures for dependability assessment

    A. Bertolino;L. Strigini

  • The Cow_Suite Approach to Planning and Deriving Test Suites in UML Projects

    Francesca Basanieri;Antonia Bertolino;Eda Marchetti

  • The audition framework for testing Web services interoperability

    A. Bertolino;A. Polini

  • CB-SPE Tool: Putting Component-Based Performance Engineering into Practice

    Antonia Bertolino;Raffaela Mirandola

  • Use case-based testing of product lines

    Antonia Bertolino;Stefania Gnesi

  • Deriving test plans from architectural descriptions

    A. Bertolino;F. Corradini;P. Inverardi;H. Muccini

  • FAST approaches to scalable similarity-based test case prioritization

    Breno Miranda;Emilio Cruciani;Roberto Verdecchia;Antonia Bertolino

  • Model-Based Generation of Testbeds for Web Services

    Antonia Bertolino;Guglielmo Angelis;Lars Frantzen;Andrea Polini

  • Audition of web services for testing conformance to open specified protocols

    Antonia Bertolino;Lars Frantzen;Andrea Polini;Jan Tretmans

  • Introducing a Reasonably Complete and Coherent Approach for Model-based Testing

    A. Bertolino;E. Marchetti;H. Muccini

  • Software testing research and practice

    Antonia Bertolino

  • An Orchestrated Survey on Automated Software Test Case Generation I

    Saswat Anand;Edmund Burke;Tsong Yueh Chen;John Clark

  • Testing software components for integration: a survey of issues and techniques

    Muhammad Jaffar-ur Rehman;Fakhra Jabeen;Antonia Bertolino;Andrea Polini

  • What is the Vocabulary of Flaky Tests

    Gustavo Pinto;Breno Miranda;Supun Dissanayake;Marcelo d'Amorim

  • Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 2

    Antonia Bertolino;Gerardo Canfora;Sebastian Elbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Raffaela Mirandola
Raffaela Mirandola Polytechnic University of Milan
Henry Muccini
Henry Muccini University of L'Aquila
Paola Inverardi
Paola Inverardi University of L'Aquila
Marta Kwiatkowska
Marta Kwiatkowska University of Oxford
Fabio Martinelli
Fabio Martinelli National Research Council (CNR)
Valérie Issarny
Valérie Issarny French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Stefania Gnesi
Stefania Gnesi Institute of Information Science and Technologies
Ivica Crnkovic
Ivica Crnkovic Chalmers University of Technology
Sebastian Elbaum
Sebastian Elbaum University of Virginia
Bengt Jonsson
Bengt Jonsson Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career opportunities. Students interested in expanding their skills might consider an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering, which can complement computer science knowledge with practical engineering expertise.

For those looking to quickly boost their qualifications or change career paths, several 3-month certificate programs that pay well are available online. These options are ideal for gaining in-demand skills in a short timeframe and increasing earning potential efficiently.

If you are interested in graduate education but want to minimize time spent, consider enrolling in the shortest online masters degree programs. These accelerated paths offer a fast-track to advanced qualifications without sacrificing quality.

When planning your next step, it's also wise to explore graduate degrees that are worth it. Choosing a program widely recognized for its market demand can improve job prospects and long-term career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Antonia Bertolino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles