World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
9665
World Ranking
7130
National Ranking
175

Fabio Martinelli publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Martinelli sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 535 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fabio Martinelli D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Martinelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fabio Martinelli is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy. Their research spans across multiple disciplines with a focus on both Physics and Astronomy as well as Mathematics.

Martinelli's primary fields of study include:

  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Mathematics

Within these broad domains, their work delves into several subfields such as:

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mathematical Physics
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Their research topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach, covering areas like:

  • Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Liquid Crystal Research Advancements
  • Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)

Fabio Martinelli has published extensively, with a significant presence in leading journals and repositories. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Annals of Probability
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Probability Theory and Related Fields
  • The Annals of Applied Probability

Among their recent papers are:

  • Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2025
  • Exact asymptotics for Duarte and supercritical rooted kinetically constrained models, 2020, The Annals of Probability
  • Sharp threshold for the FA-2f kinetically constrained model, 2022, Probability Theory and Related Fields
  • Universality for critical KCM: Finite number of stable directions, 2021, The Annals of Probability
  • Coalescing and branching simple symmetric exclusion process, 2022, The Annals of Applied Probability

Collaboration is a notable part of Martinelli's career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Cristina Toninelli
  • Ivailo Hartarsky
  • Yannick Couzinié
  • Zahra Pooranian
  • Concetta Campailla

Best Publications

  • A Survey on Security for Mobile Devices

    M. La Polla;Fabio Martinelli;D. Sgandurra

  • MADAM: a multi-level anomaly detector for android malware

    Gianluca Dini;Fabio Martinelli;Andrea Saracino;Daniele Sgandurra

  • MADAM: Effective and Efficient Behavior-based Android Malware Detection and Prevention

    Andrea Saracino;Daniele Sgandurra;Gianluca Dini;Fabio Martinelli

  • A Classification of Security Properties

    R. Focardi;R. Gorrieri

  • Classification of ransomware families with machine learning based on N-gram of opcodes

    Hanqi Zhang;Hanqi Zhang;Xi Xiao;Francesco Mercaldo;Shiguang Ni

  • Cyber-insurance survey

    Angelica Marotta;Fabio Martinelli;Stefano Nanni;Albina Orlando

  • Formal Aspects in Security and Trust

    Pierpaolo Degano;Joshua Guttman;Fabio Martinelli

  • Survey: Usage control in computer security: A survey

    Aliaksandr Lazouski;Fabio Martinelli;Paolo Mori

  • Non Interference for the Analysis of Cryptographic Protocols

    Riccardo Focardi;Roberto Gorrieri;Fabio Martinelli

  • A Uniform Approach for the Definition of Security Properties

    Unknown

  • Information flow analysis in a discrete-time process algebra

    R. Focardi;R. Gorrieri;F. Martinelli

  • Human behavior characterization for driving style recognition in vehicle system

    Fabio Martinelli;Francesco Mercaldo;Albina Orlando;Vittoria Nardone

  • R-PackDroid: API package-based characterization and detection of mobile ransomware

    Davide Maiorca;Francesco Mercaldo;Giorgio Giacinto;Corrado Aaron Visaggio

  • Car hacking identification through fuzzy logic algorithms

    Fabio Martinelli;Francesco Mercaldo;Vittoria Nardone;Antonella Santone

  • Evaluating Convolutional Neural Network for Effective Mobile Malware Detection

    Fabio Martinelli;Fiammetta Marulli;Francesco Mercaldo

  • Detection of images with adult content for parental control on mobile devices

    Giuseppe Amato;Paolo Bolettieri;Gabriele Costa;Francesco la Torre

  • Analysis of security protocols as open systems

    Unknown

  • SEAS, a secure e-voting protocol: Design and implementation

    Fabrizio Baiardi;Alessandro Falleni;Riccardo Granchi;Fabio Martinelli

  • Trust Aware Continuous Authorization for Zero Trust in Consumer Internet of Things

    Unknown

  • Towards an interpretable deep learning model for mobile malware detection and family identification

    Giacomo Iadarola;Fabio Martinelli;Francesco Mercaldo;Francesco Mercaldo;Antonella Santone

  • Real-time information flow analysis

    R. Focardi;R. Gorrieri;F. Martinelli

  • On the effectiveness of system API-related information for Android ransomware detection

    Michele Scalas;Davide Maiorca;Francesco Mercaldo;Corrado Aaron Visaggio

  • Classification of Security Properties - Part II: Network Security.

    Riccardo Focardi;Roberto Gorrieri;Fabio Martinelli

  • Usage Control on Cloud systems

    Enrico Carniani;Davide D'Arenzo;Aliaksandr Lazouski;Fabio Martinelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Mercaldo
Francesco Mercaldo University of Molise
Antonella Santone
Antonella Santone University of Molise
Roberto Gorrieri
Roberto Gorrieri University of Bologna
Alfredo Cuzzocrea
Alfredo Cuzzocrea University of Calabria
Fabio Massacci
Fabio Massacci Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Corrado Aaron Visaggio
Corrado Aaron Visaggio University of Sannio
Gianluca Dini
Gianluca Dini University of Pisa
Antonia Bertolino
Antonia Bertolino National Research Council (CNR)
Valérie Issarny
Valérie Issarny French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right degree and college can open doors to rewarding career opportunities in Computer Science. For those seeking fast entry into the workforce or a flexible start, pursuing online associate degree programs is a popular route. These programs allow students to build foundational skills affordably and on their own schedule.

Many learners are also looking for affordable online colleges to minimize tuition costs while earning a reputable degree. These institutions provide access to quality education without the financial strain of traditional programs.

For students concerned about past academic performance, there are options such as a college that accepts low gpa, expanding access to higher education and career advancement.

If you’re aiming for advanced opportunities, it’s helpful to know which master's degree is most in demand in usa to align your studies with current job market needs.

Exploring these flexible pathways can help you choose the best educational route to a successful technology career.

Best Scientists Citing Fabio Martinelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles