World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas M. MacDonald

Thomas M. MacDonald

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
27676
World Ranking
14116
National Ranking
1306

Thomas M. MacDonald publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. MacDonald sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 532 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas M. MacDonald D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. MacDonald sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Diabetes mellitus

His scientific interests lie mostly in Internal medicine, Cohort study, Surgery, Epidemiology and Endocrinology. His Internal medicine research incorporates themes from Diabetes mellitus and Cardiology. Thomas M. MacDonald combines subjects such as Relative risk, Clinical trial, Retrospective cohort study and Hazard ratio with his study of Cohort study.

His work deals with themes such as Meta-analysis, Lower risk, Poisson regression and Pioglitazone, which intersect with Surgery. The study incorporates disciplines such as Incidence and Etiology in addition to Epidemiology. His work in the fields of Endocrinology, such as Renin–angiotensin system, intersects with other areas such as Context.

His most cited work include:

  • Taking glucocorticoids by prescription is associated with subsequent cardiovascular disease. (538 citations)
  • Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial (528 citations)
  • Association of road-traffic accidents with benzodiazepine use (474 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Cardiology, Surgery and Endocrinology. His work on Internal medicine is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Diabetes mellitus. Thomas M. MacDonald has included themes like Ambulatory, Anesthesia and Placebo in his Blood pressure study.

His research in Surgery intersects with topics in Epidemiology and Myocardial infarction. In his work, Pediatrics is strongly intertwined with Incidence, which is a subfield of Epidemiology. His Cohort study research integrates issues from Proportional hazards model and Hazard ratio.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (56.40%)
  • Blood pressure (18.80%)
  • Cardiology (17.40%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (56.40%)
  • Blood pressure (18.80%)
  • Clinical trial (5.80%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Thomas M. MacDonald mainly investigates Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Clinical trial, Hazard ratio and Randomized controlled trial. His Internal medicine study which covers Cardiology that intersects with Uric acid. His Blood pressure research includes elements of Diabetes mellitus, Spironolactone, Placebo and Urology.

His study on Clinical trial also encompasses disciplines like

  • Morning which intersects with area such as Physical therapy and Primary care,
  • Dosing and related Pediatrics,
  • Ambulatory blood pressure, Drug, Alternative medicine and Public health most often made with reference to Intensive care medicine. As a member of one scientific family, Thomas M. MacDonald mostly works in the field of Hazard ratio, focusing on Proportional hazards model and, on occasion, Clostridium difficile, Stool test, Campylobacter and Bacterial Gastroenteritis. His Randomized controlled trial research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Amlodipine, Tolerability, Combination therapy and Prospective cohort study.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial (528 citations)
  • Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a multipopulation pooled, cumulative exposure analysis (112 citations)
  • Endocrine and haemodynamic changes in resistant hypertension, and blood pressure responses to spironolactone or amiloride: the PATHWAY-2 mechanisms substudies (81 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Diabetes mellitus

Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Hazard ratio, Clinical endpoint and Spironolactone are his primary areas of study. Internal medicine is closely attributed to Cardiology in his research. His work is dedicated to discovering how Blood pressure, Urology are connected with Diuretic and Hydrochlorothiazide and other disciplines.

Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Proportional hazards model under Hazard ratio, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Dutasteride. His Clinical endpoint study also includes fields such as

  • Myocardial infarction, Emergency medicine and Surgery most often made with reference to Stroke,
  • Allopurinol that connect with fields like Risk factor, Febuxostat, Prospective cohort study, Gout and Record linkage. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Bisoprolol and Placebo, Crossover study.

Best Publications

  • Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial

    Bryan Williams;Thomas M MacDonald;Steve Morant;David J Webb

  • Taking glucocorticoids by prescription is associated with subsequent cardiovascular disease.

    Li Wei;Thomas M. MacDonald;Brian R. Walker

  • Association of road-traffic accidents with benzodiazepine use

    F. Barbone;F. Barbone;A. D. McMahon;P. G. Davey;Andrew Morris

  • Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Andrew D Morris;Douglas I R Boyle;Alex D McMahon;Stephen A Greene

  • Effect of ibuprofen on cardioprotective effect of aspirin

    TM MacDonald;L Wei

  • Adherence to prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medication in a population of patients with Type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

    P. T. Donnan;T. M. MacDonald;A. D. Morris

  • Primary non-compliance with prescribed medication in primary care.

    P. H. G. Beardon;M. M. Mcgilchrist;A. D. Mckendrick;D. G. Mcdevitt

  • Socio-economic status, obesity and prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Josie Evans;Ray W Newton;Danny A Ruta;Thomas M MacDonald

  • Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration and morbidity from cardiovascular disease and fractures in patients on long-term thyroxine therapy

    Robert W. Flynn;Sandra R. Bonellie;Roland T. Jung;Thomas M. MacDonald

  • Nebivolol Reverses Endothelial Dysfunction in Essential Hypertension A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

    Nikolaos Tzemos;Pitt O. Lim;Thomas M. MacDonald

  • Association of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with continued exposure: cohort study

    T. M. MacDonald;S. V. Morant;G. C. Robinson;M. J. Shield

  • The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (darts) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register

    Andrew D. Morris;Douglas I R Boyle;Ritchie MacAlpine;Alistair Emslie-Smith

  • Echocardiography in chronic heart failure in the community

    N.M. Wheeldon;T.M. MacDONALD;C.J. Flucker;A.D. McKENDRICK

  • Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycaemic control: observational study with diabetes database.

    Josie M M Evans;Ray W Newton;Danny A Ruta;Thomas M MacDonald

  • Adherence to statin treatment and readmission of patients after myocardial infarction: a six year follow up study

    L Wei;J Wang;P Thompson;S Wong

  • Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the UK 1990–2010: a descriptive study in the General Practice Research Database

    I S Mackenzie;S V Morant;G A Bloomfield;T M MacDonald

  • High prevalence of primary aldosteronism in the Tayside hypertension clinic population.

    Pitt O. Lim;E. Dow;G. Brennan;R. T. Jung

  • Review of aldosterone- and angiotensin II-induced target organ damage and prevention

    Allan D Struthers;Thomas M MacDonald

  • Potentially high prevalence of primary aldosteronism in a primary-care population

    Pitt O Lim;Paula Rodgers;Kate Cardale;Alexander D Watson

  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with emergency admission to hospital for colitis due to inflammatory bowel disease.

    Josie Evans;Alex McMahon;Frank E Murray;Denis G McDevitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan D. Struthers
Allan D. Struthers University of Dundee
Andrew D. Morris
Andrew D. Morris University of Edinburgh
Peter T. Donnan
Peter T. Donnan University of Dundee
Ian Ford
Ian Ford University of Glasgow
Alex S. F. Doney
Alex S. F. Doney University of Dundee
Morris J. Brown
Morris J. Brown Queen Mary University of London
Bryan Williams
Bryan Williams University College London
David J. Webb
David J. Webb University of Edinburgh
Gordon D. Murray
Gordon D. Murray University of Edinburgh
Peter S. Sever
Peter S. Sever Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees and career pathways in healthcare can open doors to rewarding opportunities, even for those not pursuing traditional medical school. For instance, students interested in administrative or non-clinical roles might consider training at the best medical billing and coding schools online, which often offer flexible schedules and the possibility of financial aid.

Those drawn to direct patient care, but seeking a quicker entry point, may look at lpn program no entrance exam options. These programs allow aspiring nurses to bypass standardized testing requirements, streamlining the admission process.

Leadership-minded students can accelerate their journey into healthcare management by enrolling in healthcare administration degree programs, available fully online for maximum convenience.

For registered nurses considering advanced practice roles, the asn to fnp programs offer seamless bridge opportunities to become a family nurse practitioner without repeating undergraduate coursework.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. MacDonald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles