World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
96515
World Ranking
4816
National Ranking
472

Bryan Williams publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Williams sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 591 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bryan Williams D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Williams sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan Williams is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research is focused primarily on the field of Medicine, with a significant number of publications in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other areas of research include Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics covered in their body of work include:

  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Sodium Intake and Health

Frequent publication venues where Bryan Williams has contributed include:

  • Journal of Hypertension
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet
  • European Heart Journal
  • Hypertension

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as:

  • Luís M. Ruilope
  • Giuseppe Mancia
  • Markus P. Schlaich
  • Maciej Tomaszewski
  • Felix Mahfoud

A selection of recent papers authored or co-authored by Bryan Williams includes:

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines, 2020, Hypertension
  • 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, 2023, Journal of Hypertension
  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines, 2020, Journal of Hypertension
  • Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine, 2021, Future Healthcare Journal

Best Publications

  • 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    Giuseppe Mancia;Guy De Backer;Anna Dominiczak;Renata Cifkova

  • Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Anushka Patel;Stephen MacMahon;John Chalmers

  • 2003 European society of hypertension - European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    G Mancia;EA Rosei;R Cifkova;G DeBacker

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Frank L J Visseren;François Mach;Yvo M Smulders;David Carballo

  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines.

    Thomas Unger;Claudio Borghi;Fadi Charchar;Nadia A Khan

  • Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study.

    Bryan Williams;Peter S. Lacy;Simon M. Thom;Kennedy Cruickshank

  • 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension : The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension

    Bryan Williams;Giuseppe Mancia;Wilko Spiering;Enrico Agabiti Rosei

  • MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY RESULTS FROM THE EUROPEAN WORKING PARTY ON HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IN THE ELDERLY TRIAL

    A. Amery;P. Brixko;D. Clement;A. De Schaepdryver

  • Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people.

    Eleni Rapsomaniki;Adam Timmis;Julie George;Mar Pujades-Rodriguez

  • Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IV

    Williams B;Poulter Nr;Brown Mj;Davis M

  • Lifestyle interventions to reduce raised blood pressure: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    Heather O Dickinson;James M Mason;Donald J Nicolson;Fiona Campbell

  • Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial

    Bryan Williams;Thomas M MacDonald;Steve Morant;David J Webb

  • Albuminuria and Kidney Function Independently Predict Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetes

    Toshiharu Ninomiya;Vlado Perkovic;Bastiaan E de Galan;Bastiaan E de Galan;Sophia Zoungas

  • British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary

    Bryan Williams;Neil R Poulter;Morris J Brown;Mark Davis

  • Central Blood Pressure Measurements and Antihypertensive Therapy: A Consensus Document

    Enrico Agabiti-Rosei;Giuseppe Mancia;Michael F. O'Rourke;Mary J. Roman

  • Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society.

    LE Ramsay;B Williams;GD Johnston;GA MacGregor

  • Follow-up of Blood-Pressure Lowering and Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

    Sophia Zoungas;John Chalmers;Bruce Neal;Laurent Billot

  • Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomised controlled trial.

    Richard J McManus;Jonathan Mant;Emma P Bray;Roger Holder

  • Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance

    Taryn Krause;Kate Lovibond;Mark Caulfield;Terry McCormack

  • Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Differential Impact of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on Central Aortic Pressure and Clinical Outcomes: Principal Results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study”

    Bryan Williams;Peter S. Lacy;Herbert Thurston;Simon Thom

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Giuseppe Mancia
Giuseppe Mancia University of Milano-Bicocca
Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Richard J McManus
Richard J McManus University of Oxford
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Luis M. Ruilope
Luis M. Ruilope European University of Madrid
Neil R. Poulter
Neil R. Poulter Imperial College London
Michel Marre
Michel Marre Université Paris Cité
Bruce Neal
Bruce Neal George Institute for Global Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medical education in the USA offers numerous online pathways for those seeking flexible alternatives or specialized fields outside of traditional MD programs. For entry-level nursing, lpn program options provide an efficient way to begin a nursing career or expand your healthcare skills.

Those interested in advanced nursing may consider the msn to pmhnp online pathway, allowing registered nurses to quickly specialize in psychiatric-mental health and increase their career prospects.

For students aspiring to lead or manage healthcare organizations, earning a health care administration online degree is a practical choice. This pathway opens doors to administrative and leadership roles within hospitals, clinics, and public health systems.

Additionally, professionals seeking further advancement often choose to pursue a master's in healthcare administration online. Such programs focus on high-level policy, finance, and operational management, and are ideal for those aiming for executive positions in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles