World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
65
Citations
14249
World Ranking
930
National Ranking
251

Carlos H. Crisosto publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlos H. Crisosto sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 276 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Carlos H. Crisosto D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlos H. Crisosto sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Horticulture
  • Gene

His scientific interests lie mostly in Horticulture, Botany, Prunus, Postharvest and Cultivar. Horticulture is represented through his Browning, Flesh, Soluble solids, Titratable acid and Maturity research. Carlos H. Crisosto works mostly in the field of Botany, limiting it down to topics relating to Ozone and, in certain cases, Phytotoxicity, Fiberboard, Plastic bag and Carton, as a part of the same area of interest.

His Prunus study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Quantitative trait locus, Qtl analysis, Expressed sequence tag and Arabidopsis. His Postharvest research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Fruit tree, Quality, Flame Seedless and Irrigation. In his study, Consumer satisfaction is strongly linked to Rosaceae, which falls under the umbrella field of Cultivar.

His most cited work include:

  • Chilling injury in peach and nectarine (359 citations)
  • Cell wall metabolism during maturation, ripening and senescence of peach fruit (311 citations)
  • Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color (217 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Horticulture, Botany, Postharvest, Cultivar and Flesh. His Horticulture research focuses on Ripening, Prunus, Browning, Titratable acid and Soluble solids. His studies deal with areas such as Food preservation and Genotype as well as Botany.

His Postharvest study combines topics in areas such as Botrytis cinerea, Flame Seedless and Agronomy. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Organoleptic, Food science, Flavor and Ficus. His Flesh research incorporates elements of Locus and Chilling injury.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Horticulture (64.68%)
  • Botany (27.23%)
  • Postharvest (22.98%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Horticulture (64.68%)
  • Cultivar (22.98%)
  • Postharvest (22.98%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Horticulture, Cultivar, Postharvest, Food science and Ripening. His Botany research extends to Horticulture, which is thematically connected. His studies deal with areas such as Shelf life, Juglans, Protein biomarkers, Ficus and Carica as well as Cultivar.

His Postharvest study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Table grape, Inoculation and Cladosporium. The concepts of his Food science study are interwoven with issues in Quinic acid and Micronutrient. Carlos H. Crisosto has included themes like Biochemistry, Gene, Flesh and Japanese plum in his Ripening study.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • High density SNP mapping and QTL analysis for fruit quality characteristics in peach (Prunus persica L.) (74 citations)
  • Nutritional Quality of Fruits and Vegetables (61 citations)
  • Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) and Mendelian Trait Loci (MTL) Analysis in Prunus: a Breeding Perspective and Beyond (56 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Horticulture

Carlos H. Crisosto mainly investigates Cultivar, Horticulture, Quantitative trait locus, Genetics and Botany. In Cultivar, Carlos H. Crisosto works on issues like Food science, which are connected to Composition. His research in Horticulture is mostly concerned with Postharvest.

His work deals with themes such as Japanese plum, Ripening, Shelf life and Prunus salicina, which intersect with Postharvest. Carlos H. Crisosto interconnects Genetic linkage, Prunus, Genome and Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the investigation of issues within Quantitative trait locus. His Botany research includes elements of Transcriptome, Gene expression, Browning and Auxin.

Best Publications

  • Chilling injury in peach and nectarine

    Susan Lurie;Carlos H. Crisosto

  • Cell wall metabolism during maturation, ripening and senescence of peach fruit

    David A. Brummell;Valeriano Dal Cin;Carlos H. Crisosto;John M. Labavitch

  • Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color

    Carlos H Crisosto;Gayle M Crisosto;Paul Metheney

  • Increasing 'Blackamber' plum (Prunus salicina Lindell) consumer acceptance

    Carlos H. Crisosto;David Garner;Gayle M. Crisosto;Earl Bowerman

  • Susceptibility to Chilling Injury of Peach, Nectarine, and Plum Cultivars Grown in California

    Carlos H. Crisosto;F. Gordon Mitchell;Zhiguo Ju

  • Effects of continuous 0.3 ppm ozone exposure on decay development and physiological responses of peaches and table grapes in cold storage

    Lluõ ´ s Palou;Carlos H. Crisosto;Joseph L. Smilanick;James E. Adaskaveg

  • Cell wall metabolism during the development of chilling injury in cold-stored peach fruit: association of mealiness with arrested disassembly of cell wall pectins

    David A. Brummell;Valeriano Dal Cin;Susan Lurie;Carlos H. Crisosto

  • Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid melting flesh peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cultivars

    Carlos H. Crisosto;Gayle M. Crisosto

  • Application of abscisic acid (ABA) at veraison advanced red color development and maintained postharvest quality of ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes

    Celia M. Cantín;Matthew W. Fidelibus;Carlos H. Crisosto

  • Carbon dioxide-enriched atmospheres during cold storage limit losses from Botrytis but accelerate rachis browning of ‘Redglobe’ table grapes

    Carlos H Crisosto;David Garner;Gayle Crisosto

  • Relationship between nondestructive firmness measurements and commercially important ripening fruit stages for peaches, nectarines and plums

    Constantino Valero;Carlos H. Crisosto;David Slaughter

  • Factors in fresh market stone fruit quality

    Carlos H. Crisosto;F. Gordon Mitchell;Scott Johnson

  • Effect of Gaseous Ozone Exposure on the Development of Green and Blue Molds on Cold Stored Citrus Fruit

    Lluís Palou;Joseph L. Smilanick;Carlos H. Crisosto;Monir Mansour

  • Genotypic variability in vulnerability of leaf xylem to cavitation in water-stressed and well-irrigated sugarcane.

    Howard S. Neufeld;David A. Grantz;Frederick C. Meinzer;Guillermo Goldstein

  • Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality

    C.H. Crisosto;R.S. Johnson;T. DeJong;K.R. Day

  • The Fig: Overview of an Ancient Fruit

    Ed Stover;Malli Aradhya;Louise Ferguson;Carlos H. Crisosto

  • Browning Potential, Phenolic Composition, and Polyphenoloxidase Activity of Buffer Extracts of Peach and Nectarine Skin Tissue

    Guiwen W. Cheng;Carlos H. Crisosto

  • Irrigation Regimes Affect Fruit Soluble Solids Concentration and Rate of Water Loss of `O'Henry' Peaches

    Carlos H. Crisosto;R. Scott Johnson;Juvenal G. Luza;Gayle M. Crisosto

  • Stone fruit maturity indices: a descriptive review

    Carlos H. Crisosto

  • Evaluating Quality Attributes of Four Fresh Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars Harvested at Two Maturity Stages

    Carlos H. Crisosto;Vanessa Bremer;Louise Ferguson;Gayle M. Crisosto

  • Orchard Factors Affecting Postharvest Stone Fruit Quality

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas M. Gradziel
Thomas M. Gradziel University of California, Davis
George A. Manganaris
George A. Manganaris Cyprus University of Technology
Joseph L. Smilanick
Joseph L. Smilanick Agricultural Research Service
Lluís Palou
Lluís Palou Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias
John M. Labavitch
John M. Labavitch University of California, Davis
Abhaya M. Dandekar
Abhaya M. Dandekar University of California, Davis
Pietro Tonutti
Pietro Tonutti Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Susan Lurie
Susan Lurie Agricultural Research Organization
Randall S. Johnson
Randall S. Johnson University of Cambridge
Themis J. Michailides
Themis J. Michailides University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Carlos H. Crisosto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles