World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
6744
World Ranking
3474
National Ranking
873

Thomas M. Gradziel publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Gradziel sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 193 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Thomas M. Gradziel D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Gradziel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Structural and Transcriptional Analysis of the Self-Incompatibility Locus of Almond: Identification of a Pollen-Expressed F-Box Gene with Haplotype-Specific Polymorphism

    Koichiro Ushijima;Hidenori Sassa;Abhaya M. Dandekar;Thomas M. Gradziel

  • Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding S-RNases from almond (Prunus dulcis): primary structural features and sequence diversity of the S-RNases in Rosaceae

    K. Ushijima;H. Sassa;R. Tao;H. Yamane

  • Factors Influencing Gene Delivery into Zea Mays Cells by High–Velocity Microprojectiles

    Unknown

  • IDENTIFICATION OF SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY GENOTYPES OF ALMOND BY ALLELE-SPECIFIC PCR ANALYSIS

    M. Tamura;K. Ushijima;H. Sassa;H. Hirano

  • Identification of Stylar RNases Associated with Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in Almond (Prunus dulcis)

    Ryutaro Tao;Hisayo Yamane;Hidenori Sassa;Hitoshi Mori

  • Endopolygalacturonase: a Candidate Gene for Freestone and Melting Flesh in Peach

    C. P. Peace;C. H. Crisosto;T. M. Gradziel

  • Transient Gene Expression in Maize, Rice, and Wheat Cells Using an Airgun Apparatus

    James H. Oard;David F. Paige;John A. Simmonds;Thomas M. Gradziel

  • OIL CONTENT AND FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF ALMOND KERNELS FROM DIFFERENT GENOTYPES AND CALIFORNIA PRODUCTION REGIONS

    Ashraf Abdallah;Miguel H. Ahumada;Thomas M. Gradziel

  • Amplified fragment length polymorphism as a tool for molecular characterization of almond germplasm: genetic diversity among cultivated genotypes and related wild species of almond, and its relationships with agronomic traits

    Karim Sorkheh;Behrouz Shiran;Thomas M. Gradziel;B. K. Epperson

  • A fruit quality gene map of Prunus.

    Ebenezer A Ogundiwin;Cameron P Peace;Thomas M Gradziel;Dan E Parfitt

  • An extended interspecific gene pool available to peach and almond breeding as characterized using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers

    Pedro Martínez-Gómez;S. Arulsekar;D. Potter;Thomas M. Gradziel

  • Phenotypic diversity within native Iranian almond ( Prunus spp.) species and their breeding potential

    K. Sorkheh;B. Shiran;V. Rouhi;E. Asadi

  • Almond Quality: A Breeding Perspective

    R. Socias;O. Kodad;J. M. Alonso;T. M. Gradziel

  • Genetic Characterization and Relatedness among California Almond Cultivars and Breeding Lines Detected by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Analysis

    F. Bartolozzi;M.L. Warburton;S. Arulsekar;T.M. Gradziel

  • High density SNP mapping and QTL analysis for fruit quality characteristics in peach (Prunus persica L.)

    Pedro J. Martínez-García;Dan E. Parfitt;Ebenezer A. Ogundiwin;Joseph Fass

  • Chilling injury susceptibility in an intra-specific peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) progeny

    C.M. Cantín;C.H. Crisosto;E.A. Ogundiwin;T. Gradziel

  • Characterization of the S-locus region of almond (Prunus dulcis): analysis of a somaclonal mutant and a cosmid contig for an S haplotype.

    Koichiro Ushijima;Hidenori Sassa;Mihoko Tamura;Makoto Kusaba

  • Identifying Pollen Incompatibility Groups in California Almond Cultivars

    D.E. Kester;T.M. Gradziel;W.C. Micke

  • Development of ChillPeach genomic tools and identification of cold-responsive genes in peach fruit

    Ebenezer A. Ogundiwin;Ebenezer A. Ogundiwin;Cristina Martí;Javier Forment;Clara Pons

  • Whole genome sequencing of peach (Prunus persica L.) for SNP identification and selection

    Riaz Ahmad;Dan E Parfitt;Joseph Fass;Ebenezer Ogundiwin

  • Advances in Rootstock Breeding of Nut Trees: Objectives and Strategies.

    Kourosh Vahdati;Saadat Sarikhani;Mohammad Mehdi Arab;Charles A. Leslie

  • Stylar ribonucleases in almond: correlation with and prediction of incompatibility genotypes

    R. Bǒskovic;K. R. Tobutt;I. Batlle;H. Duval

  • Electrophoretic and Immunological Analyses of Almond (Prunus dulcis L.) Genotypes and Hybrids

    Shridhar K. Sathe;Suzanne S. Teuber;Thomas M. Gradziel;Kenneth H. Roux

  • Low Temperature Storage of Almond Pollen

    P. Martínez-Gómez;T.M. Gradziel;E. Ortega;F. Dicenta

  • Relationships among Peach, Almond, and Related Species as Detected by Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

    Pedro Martínez-Gómez;S. Arulsekar;D. Potter;Thomas M. Gradziel

  • QTL mapping of pomological traits in peach and related species breeding germplasm

    Jonathan Fresnedo-Ramírez;Jonathan Fresnedo-Ramírez;Marco C. A. M. Bink;Eric van de Weg;Thomas R. Famula

  • The origin and dissemination of the cultivated almond as determined by nuclear and chloroplast SSR marker analysis

    M. Zeinalabedini;M. Khayam-Nekoui;V. Grigorian;T.M. Gradziel

  • Discovery of non-climacteric and suppressed climacteric bud sport mutations originating from a climacteric Japanese plum cultivar (Prunus salicina Lindl.).

    Ioannis S. Minas;Carolina Font i Forcada;Gerald S. Dangl;Thomas M. Gradziel

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos H. Crisosto
Carlos H. Crisosto University of California, Davis
Abhaya M. Dandekar
Abhaya M. Dandekar University of California, Davis
Ryutaro Tao
Ryutaro Tao Kyoto University
Hisayo Yamane
Hisayo Yamane Kyoto University
Richard M. Bostock
Richard M. Bostock University of California, Davis
Diane M. Barrett
Diane M. Barrett University of California, Davis
Pere Arús
Pere Arús Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology
Kenneth H. Roux
Kenneth H. Roux Florida State University
Hisashi Hirano
Hisashi Hirano Yokohama City University
Kenneth A. Shackel
Kenneth A. Shackel University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Gradziel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles