World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
18079
World Ranking
11751
National Ranking
5054

Chemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
16898
World Ranking
10928
National Ranking
2995

Diane M. Barrett publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 117 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Diane M. Barrett D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diane M. Barrett is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research contributions fall primarily within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on three main subfields: Information Systems, Signal Processing, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their work encompasses several key topics, including:

  • Digital and Cyber Forensics
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Digital Media Forensic Detection

Diane M. Barrett has published three papers in total across the identified subfields of study, demonstrating interdisciplinary engagement within Computer Science. Their research includes two publications related to Digital and Cyber Forensics, two addressing Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, and two in the area of Digital Media Forensic Detection.

The scientist's research appears to be focused on enhancing mechanisms for detecting and analyzing digital threats, malware, and forensic evidence in digital media. This aligns with emerging concerns in cybersecurity and digital integrity that utilize methods from computer vision and pattern recognition as well as signal processing.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, frequent publication venues, or book publications data are available for further detailing their collaborative engagements or publishing patterns.

Best Publications

  • Methods for Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Efficient Hydrolysis and Biofuel Production

    Parveen Kumar;Diane M. Barrett;Michael J. Delwiche;Pieter Stroeve

  • Comparison of the total phenolic and ascorbic acid content of freeze-dried and air-dried marionberry, strawberry, and corn grown using conventional, organic, and sustainable agricultural practices.

    Danny K Asami;Yun-Jeong Hong;Diane M Barrett;Alyson E Mitchell

  • Color, Flavor, Texture, and Nutritional Quality of Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: Desirable Levels, Instrumental and Sensory Measurement, and the Effects of Processing

    Diane M. Barrett;John C. Beaulieu;Rob Shewfelt

  • Review Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds

    Joy C Rickman;Diane M Barrett;Christine M Bruhn

  • Ten-year comparison of the influence of organic and conventional crop management practices on the content of flavonoids in tomatoes.

    Alyson E. Mitchell;Yun Jeong Hong;Eunmi Koh;Diane M. Barrett

  • Comparison of calcium chloride and calcium lactate effectiveness in maintaining shelf stability and quality of fresh-cut cantaloupes.

    Irene Luna-Guzmán;Diane M Barrett

  • Thermal degradation of glucosinolates in red cabbage

    Kirsten Oerlemans;Diane M. Barrett;Carme Bosch Suades;Ruud Verkerk

  • Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen, and canned fruits and vegetables II. Vitamin A and carotenoids, vitamin E, minerals and fiber

    Joy C Rickman;Christine M Bruhn;Diane M Barrett

  • Kinetic Parameters for the Thermal Inactivation of Quality-Related Enzymes in Carrots and Potatoes

    Gordon E. Anthon;Diane M. Barrett

  • Fresh-cut cantaloupe: effects of CaCl2 dips and heat treatments on firmness and metabolic activity

    Irene Luna-Guzmán;Marita Cantwell;Diane M Barrett

  • Changes in pH, acids, sugars and other quality parameters during extended vine holding of ripe processing tomatoes.

    Gordon E Anthon;Michelle LeStrange;Diane M Barrett

  • Preservative Treatments for Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables

    Elisabeth Garcia;Diane M. Barrett

  • Textural Modification of Processing Tomatoes

    Diane M. Barrett;Elisabeth Garcia;Jo Ellen Wayne

  • Modified method for the determination of pyruvic acid with dinitrophenylhydrazine in the assessment of onion pungency

    Gordon E Anthon;Diane M Barrett

  • Comparison of Three Colorimetric Reagents in the Determination of Methanol with Alcohol Oxidase. Application to the Assay of Pectin Methylesterase

    Gordon E Anthon;Diane M Barrett

  • Low-Density Lipoprotein Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds and Polyphenol Oxidase Activity in Selected Clingstone Peach Cultivars

    Susan Chang;Christine Tan;Edwin N. Frankel;Diane M. Barrett

  • Nonenzymatic Degradation of Citrus Pectin and Pectate during Prolonged Heating: Effects of pH, Temperature, and Degree of Methyl Esterification

    Jerome V Diaz;Gordon E Anthon;Diane M Barrett

  • Advanced preservation methods and nutrient retention in fruits and vegetables.

    Diane M Barrett;Beate Lloyd

  • Thermal, High Pressure, and Electric Field Processing Effects on Plant Cell Membrane Integrity and Relevance to Fruit and Vegetable Quality

    Maria E. Gonzalez;Diane M. Barrett

  • Processing fruits : science and technology

    Diane M. Barrett;Laszlo P. Somogyi;Hosahalli S. Ramaswamy

Frequent Co-Authors

Pieter Stroeve
Pieter Stroeve University of California, Davis
Elizabeth J. Mitcham
Elizabeth J. Mitcham University of California, Davis
Thomas M. Gradziel
Thomas M. Gradziel University of California, Davis
Juming Tang
Juming Tang Washington State University
Chang Yong Lee
Chang Yong Lee Cornell University
Shyam S. Sablani
Shyam S. Sablani Washington State University
Luis E. Rodriguez-Saona
Luis E. Rodriguez-Saona The Ohio State University
Susan E. Ebeler
Susan E. Ebeler University of California, Davis
Ronald E. Wrolstad
Ronald E. Wrolstad Oregon State University
R. Ford Denison
R. Ford Denison University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Diane M. Barrett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles