World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
165
Citations
93308
World Ranking
638
National Ranking
367

William J. Kraemer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Kraemer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,015 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Kraemer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Kraemer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 165 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Kraemer is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Physiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cell Biology, Rehabilitation, and Public Health, Environmental, and Occupational Health.

Their work covers a range of topics, including:

  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology

Kraemer has co-authored numerous publications with several frequent collaborators, among them Jeff S. Volek, Carl M. Maresh, Mike Nitka, Lydia K. Caldwell, and Robert U. Newton.

Their research has been published in a variety of venues, with notable frequency in:

  • Strength and Conditioning Journal
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • PubMed
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology

Some recent publications authored or co-authored by William J. Kraemer include:

  • "Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis," 2020, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • "Growth Hormone(s), Testosterone, Insulin-Like Growth Factors, and Cortisol: Roles and Integration for Cellular Development and Growth With Exercise," 2020, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • "A Narrative Review of Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Functioning: Bringing a New Characteristic to Muscle Memory," 2020, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • "A ketogenic diet combined with exercise alters mitochondrial function in human skeletal muscle while improving metabolic health," 2020, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • "Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Use in Sports, Health, and Society," 2021, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Best Publications

  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults

    Kraemer Wj;Adams K;Cafarelli E;Dudley Ga

  • Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription.

    William J. Kraemer;Nicholas A. Ratamess

  • Science and Practice of Strength Training

    V. M. Zat︠s︡iorskiĭ;William J. Kraemer

  • Hormonal Responses and Adaptations to Resistance Exercise and Training

    William J. Kraemer;William J. Kraemer;Nicholas A. Ratamess

  • Designing Resistance Training Programs

    Steven J. Fleck;William J. Kraemer

  • Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones.

    Gerson E R Campos;Thomas J Luecke;Heather K Wendeln;Kumika Toma

  • Youth resistance training: updated position statement paper from the national strength and conditioning association.

    Avery D Faigenbaum;William J Kraemer;Cameron J R Blimkie;Ian Jeffreys

  • Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations.

    W. J. Kraemer;J. F. Patton;S. E. Gordon;E. A. Harman

  • Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols.

    William J. Kraemer;Louis Marchitelli;Scott E. Gordon;Everett Harman

  • Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women

    Robert S. Staron;D. L. Karapondo;William J. Kraemer;Andrew C. Fry

  • Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people

    K. Häkkinen;M. Kallinen;M. Izquierdo;K. Jokelainen

  • Resistance Training for Older Adults: Position Statement From the National Strength and Conditioning Association.

    Maren S. Fragala;Eduardo Lusa Cadore;Sandor Dorgo;Mikel Izquierdo

  • Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training

    K. Häkkinen;M. Alen;W. J. Kraemer;E. Gorostiaga

  • Effects of heavy-resistance training on hormonal response patterns in younger vs. older men.

    William J. Kraemer;Keijo Häkkinen;Robert U. Newton;Bradley C. Nindl

  • Endogenous anabolic hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise in males and females.

    W. J. Kraemer;S. E. Gordon;S. J. Fleck;L. J. Marchitelli

  • Developing Explosive Muscular Power: Implications for a Mixed Methods Training Strategy

    Robert U. Newton;William J. Kraemer

  • American College of Sports Medicine roundtable. The physiological and health effects of oral creatine supplementation.

    R.L. Terjung;P. Clarkson;E.R. Eichner;P.L. Greenhaff

  • Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus

    Rhodri S Lloyd;Avery D Faigenbaum;Michael H Stone;Jon L Oliver

  • Muscle hypertrophy, hormonal adaptations and strength development during strength training in strength-trained and untrained men.

    Juha P. Ahtiainen;Arto Pakarinen;Markku Alen;William J. Kraemer

  • Performance and muscle fiber adaptations to creatine supplementation and heavy resistance training.

    Jeff Volek;Noel Duncan;Scott Mazzetti;Robert Staron

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff S. Volek
Jeff S. Volek The Ohio State University
Carl M. Maresh
Carl M. Maresh The Ohio State University
Keijo Häkkinen
Keijo Häkkinen University of Jyväskylä
Robert U. Newton
Robert U. Newton Edith Cowan University
Nicholas A. Ratamess
Nicholas A. Ratamess College of New Jersey
Lawrence E. Armstrong
Lawrence E. Armstrong University of Connecticut
Andrea M. Mastro
Andrea M. Mastro Pennsylvania State University
Maria Luz Fernandez
Maria Luz Fernandez University of Connecticut
Mikel Izquierdo
Mikel Izquierdo Universidad Publica De Navarra
Jay R. Hoffman
Jay R. Hoffman Ariel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, there are various online degrees and career pathways that can enhance or complement medical training. Nursing is a particularly popular and flexible option. If cost is a concern, exploring what is the cheapest online college for nursing? can help prospective students find accredited and affordable nursing programs online, making a healthcare career more accessible.

Nurses looking to advance their education may consider a doctorate for leadership or teaching roles. Fully online doctorate in nursing education online programs offer flexibility for working professionals. Likewise, those who are registered nurses and want to elevate their qualifications can look into the cheapest rn to bsn program online options, which allow RNs to complete a Bachelor of Science in Nursing at an affordable rate.

For individuals with a non-nursing background but interested in advanced nursing, accelerated pathways exist. Programs such as direct entry np programs for non nurses online help non-nurses earn a Master’s in Nursing, opening the door to advanced practice roles without starting from scratch.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Kraemer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles