World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jay R. Hoffman

Jay R. Hoffman

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
25392
World Ranking
17037
National Ranking
46

Jay R. Hoffman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay R. Hoffman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 505 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jay R. Hoffman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay R. Hoffman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay R. Hoffman is affiliated with Ariel University in Israel and has a research focus rooted in the field of Medicine, with a notable emphasis on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Their scholarly work also spans areas such as Physiology, Cell Biology, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Hoffman's primary research topics include Sports Performance and Training, Sports Injuries and Prevention, Biochemical Effects in Animals, Muscle Metabolism and Nutrition, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Hormonal and Reproductive Studies, and Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology.

Frequent co-authors in Hoffman's publications include:

  • Tavor Ben-Zeev
  • Chagai Levi
  • Ishay Ostfeld
  • Yftach Gepner
  • Amit Zamir

Common venues for publishing their work are:

  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
  • Nutrients
  • Journal of Dietary Supplements
  • Sensors

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Hoffman include:

  • Evaluation of a Reactive Agility Assessment Device in Youth Football Players, 2020, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
  • Exercise-induced muscle damage: mechanism, assessment and nutritional factors to accelerate recovery, 2021, European Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Supplementation with Nitric Oxide Precursors for Strength Performance: A Review of the Current Literature, 2023, Nutrients
  • Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Use in Sports, Health, and Society, 2021, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Role of β-Alanine Supplementation on Cognitive Function, Mood, and Physical Function in Older Adults; Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study, 2023, Nutrients

Best Publications

  • American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults

    Kraemer Wj;Adams K;Cafarelli E;Dudley Ga

  • Protein – Which is Best?

    Jay R. Hoffman;Michael J. Falvo

  • International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: protein and exercise

    Ralf Jäger;Chad M. Kerksick;Bill I. Campbell;Paul J. Cribb

  • Physiological Aspects of Sport Training and Performance

    Jay Hoffman

  • Norms for Fitness, Performance, and Health

    Jay Hoffman

  • Effects of a Short-Term Plyometric and Resistance Training Program on Fitness Performance in Boys Age 12 to 15 Years

    Avery D. Faigenbaum;James E. McFarland;Fred B. Keiper;William Tevlin

  • Nutritional supplementation and anabolic steroid use in adolescents.

    Jay R Hoffman;Avery D Faigenbaum;Nicholas A Ratamess;Ryan Ross

  • Relationship Between Athletic Performance Tests and Playing Time in Elite College Basketball Players

    Jay R. Hoffman;Gershon Tenenbaum;Carl M. Maresh;William J. Kraemer

  • The effect of rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise

    Nicholas A. Ratamess;Michael J. Falvo;Gerald T. Mangine;Jay R. Hoffman

  • International society of sports nutrition position stand: Beta-Alanine.

    Eric T. Trexler;Abbie E. Smith-Ryan;Jeffrey R. Stout;Jay R. Hoffman

  • Thermal and circulatory responses during exercise: effects of hypohydration, dehydration, and water intake

    Lawrence E. Armstrong;Carl M. Maresh;Catherine V. Gabaree;Jay R. Hoffman

  • Effect of creatine and beta-alanine supplementation on performance and endocrine responses in strength/power athletes.

    Jay Hoffman;Nicholas Ratamess;Jie Kang;Gerald Mangine

  • Comparison of Olympic vs. traditional power lifting training programs in football players.

    Jay R. Hoffman;Joshua J. Cooper;Michael Wendell;Jie Kang

  • Effects of β-alanine supplementation on the onset of neuromuscular fatigue and ventilatory threshold in women

    J. R. Stout;J. T. Cramer;R. F. Zoeller;D. Torok

  • MEDICAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID USE: ARE THEY EXAGGERATED?

    Jay R. Hoffman;Nicholas A. Ratamess

  • Dynamic warm-up protocols, with and without a weighted vest, and fitness performance in high school female athletes.

    Avery D Faigenbaum;James E McFarland;Jeff A Schwerdtman;Nicholas A Ratamess

  • Short-duration β-alanine supplementation increases training volume and reduces subjective feelings of fatigue in college football players.

    Jay R. Hoffman;Nicholas A. Ratamess;Avery D. Faigenbaum;Ryan Ross

  • The effect of training volume and intensity on improvements in muscular strength and size in resistance‐trained men

    Gerald T. Mangine;Jay R. Hoffman;Adam M. Gonzalez;Jeremy R. Townsend

  • International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: energy drinks.

    Bill Campbell;Colin Wilborn;Paul La Bounty;Lem Taylor

  • International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand

    Ralf Jäger;Chad M Kerksick;Bill I Campbell;Paul J Cribb

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas A. Ratamess
Nicholas A. Ratamess College of New Jersey
Avery D. Faigenbaum
Avery D. Faigenbaum College of New Jersey
Carl M. Maresh
Carl M. Maresh The Ohio State University
William J. Kraemer
William J. Kraemer The Ohio State University
Lawrence E. Armstrong
Lawrence E. Armstrong University of Connecticut
Bobby Samir Acharya
Bobby Samir Acharya King's College London
Mark Klein
Mark Klein University of Liverpool
J. T. Linnemann
J. T. Linnemann Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering Medicine in the USA opens a range of related online degrees and flexible career pathways. Prospective students aiming to work in healthcare, but seeking alternatives to traditional medical school, can explore various accessible routes.

For those interested in patient care, nursing schools with high acceptance rates can provide a valuable entry point. Some programs, like lpn to rn programs without teas test, allow students to advance without the added stress of standardized entrance exams.

Students looking for administrative or behind-the-scenes roles may consider programs in medical billing and coding. There are online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, helping eligible students access financial aid.

For a broader impact in healthcare organizations, an healthcare administration degree can open doors to management and leadership roles—many of which are available through accelerated online programs.

By exploring these diverse options, students can find a cost-effective and flexible path to a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Jay R. Hoffman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles