World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 43 7359 6784 168 156 118 8135

Ferath Kherif publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ferath Kherif between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ferath Kherif published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 10 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1999 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ferath Kherif: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 2
2001 5
2002 6
2003 4
2004 3
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 1
2011 5
2012 0
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 3
2017 2
2018 4
2019 11
2020 18
2021 14
2022 10
2023 13
2024 4
2025 6
Total 142
Download as CSV

Ferath Kherif publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ferath Kherif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 118
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ferath Kherif D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ferath Kherif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ferath Kherif is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to fields intersecting medicine and neuroscience. Their research spans cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and neurology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Kherif has published papers in a number of venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
  • Neurobiology of Aging

Selected recent publications include:

  • "Converging patterns of aging-associated brain volume loss and tissue microstructure differences," 2020, Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Towards a European health research and innovation cloud (HRIC)," 2020, Genome Medicine
  • "Mean Oxygen Saturation during Sleep Is Related to Specific Brain Atrophy Pattern," 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • "Machine Learning for Health: Algorithm Auditing & Quality Control," 2021, Journal of Medical Systems
  • "Restoring statistical validity in group analyses of motion-corrupted MRI data," 2022, Human Brain Mapping

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kherif include:

  • Bogdan Draganski
  • Antoine Lutti
  • Adeliya Latypova
  • Martin Preisig
  • Drozdstoy Stoyanov

Best Publications

  • Evidence for segregated and integrative connectivity patterns in the human Basal Ganglia.

    Bogdan Draganski;Ferath Kherif;Stefan Klöppel;Philip A Cook

  • Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Martina Huss;Ferath Kherif;Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin

  • Regional specificity of MRI contrast parameter changes in normal ageing revealed by voxel-based quantification (VBQ)

    Bogdan Draganski;John Ashburner;Chloe Hutton;Ferat Kherif;Ferat Kherif

  • hMRI – A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research

    Karsten Tabelow;Evelyne Balteau;John Ashburner;Martina F. Callaghan

  • Principal component analysis

    Ferath Kherif;Adeliya Latypova

  • The 16p11.2 locus modulates brain structures common to autism, schizophrenia and obesity

    A M Maillard;A Ruef;F Pizzagalli;E Migliavacca;E Migliavacca

  • Multivariate voxel-based morphometry successfully differentiates schizophrenia patients from healthy controls.

    Yasuhiro Kawasaki;Michio Suzuki;Ferath Kherif;Tsutomu Takahashi

  • Electroconvulsive therapy-induced brain plasticity determines therapeutic outcome in mood disorders.

    Juergen Dukart;Francesca Regen;Ferath Kherif;Michael Colla

  • Does semantic context benefit speech understanding through top-down processes? evidence from time-resolved sparse fmri

    Matthew H. Davis;Michael A. Ford;Ferath Kherif;Ingrid S. Johnsrude

  • Retinotopic organization of visual mental images as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Isabelle Klein;Jessica Dubois;Jean-François Mangin;Ferath Kherif

  • Detection of fMRI activation using cortical surface mapping.

    Alexandre Andrade;Ferath Kherif;Jean‐François Mangin;Keith J. Worsley

  • Automatized clustering and functional geometry of human parietofrontal networks for language, space, and number

    Olivier Simon;Ferath Kherif;Guillaume Flandin;Jean-Baptiste Poline

  • A primal sketch of the cortex mean curvature: a morphogenesis based approach to study the variability of the folding patterns

    A. Cachia;J.-F. Mangin;D. Riviere;F. Kherif

  • Explaining Function with Anatomy: Language Lateralization and Corpus Callosum Size

    Goulven Josse;Mohamed L. Seghier;Ferath Kherif;Cathy J. Price

  • Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects

    Ferath Kherif;Goulven Josse;Cathy J. Price

  • New tissue priors for improved automated classification of subcortical brain structures on MRI.

    Sara Lorio;Samuel Fresard;Stanislaw Adaszewski;Ferath Kherif

  • The role of the left head of caudate in suppressing irrelevant words

    Nilufa Ali;David W. Green;Ferath Kherif;Joseph T. Devlin

  • A generic framework for the parcellation of the cortical surface into gyri using geodesic Voronoı̈ diagrams

    Arnaud Cachia;Jean-François Mangin;Denis Rivière;Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos

  • Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures.

    Ferath Kherif;Jean-Baptiste Poline;Sébastien Mériaux;Habib Benali

  • Imagery or meaning? Evidence for a semantic origin of category-specific brain activity in metabolic imaging

    Olaf Hauk;Matthew H Davis;Ferath Kherif;Friedemann Pulvermüller

  • Evidence for segregated and integrative connectivity patterns in the human basal ganglia

    Bogdan Draganski;F Kherif;Stefan Klöppel;PA Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

Bogdan Draganski
Bogdan Draganski University Hospital of Bern
Antoine Lutti
Antoine Lutti University of Lausanne
Jean-Baptiste Poline
Jean-Baptiste Poline Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Richard S. J. Frackowiak
Richard S. J. Frackowiak École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Juergen Dukart
Juergen Dukart Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London
Jean-François Démonet
Jean-François Démonet University Hospital of Lausanne
Denis Le Bihan
Denis Le Bihan University of Paris-Saclay
John Ashburner
John Ashburner University College London
Martin Preisig
Martin Preisig University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to various lucrative and rewarding pathways. Many graduates pursue roles in research, healthcare, or technology, and some of these are among the highest paying jobs available today. Neuroscience also pairs well with interdisciplinary fields like data science or psychology, further expanding your options.

If you’re looking for a flexible and cost-effective start, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA. These programs offer quality education while helping you manage tuition and avoid heavy student debt. For those interested in quickly building specialized skills, certificate programs that pay well can be a smart, fast track toward specialized roles in medical technology, data analysis, or health administration.

If you’re new to remote learning or seeking a less demanding workload, exploring the easiest online degrees might be a good way to start your academic journey. These related online degrees and career pathways offer valuable entry points into both neuroscience and adjacent fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ferath Kherif

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles