World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6868
World Ranking
8068
National Ranking
186

Antoine Lutti publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine Lutti sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Antoine Lutti D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine Lutti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antoine Lutti is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research focuses on various aspects of neuroimaging, neuroscience, and medicine, with particular attention to advanced imaging techniques and brain function studies.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publications in prominent venues, with recent papers including:

  • "GnRH replacement rescues cognition in Down syndrome" (2022, Science)
  • "Converging patterns of aging-associated brain volume loss and tissue microstructure differences" (2020, Neurobiology of Aging)
  • "Mean Oxygen Saturation during Sleep Is Related to Specific Brain Atrophy Pattern" (2020, Annals of Neurology)
  • "Restoring statistical validity in group analyses of motion-corrupted MRI data" (2022, Human Brain Mapping)
  • "Temporal trajectory of brain tissue property changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy" (2021, NeuroImage)

Frequent coauthors in Antoine Lutti's publications include:

  • Bogdan Draganski
  • Ferath Kherif
  • Rita Oliveira
  • Giulia Di Domenicantonio
  • Quentin Raynaud

The scientist's work is published often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping

Main fields of study in Antoine Lutti's research consist of:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Subfields of study cover:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

The primary topics addressed in their research include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • NMR Spectroscopy and Applications
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function

Best Publications

  • Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD(*), MT, and R2(*) at 3T: a multi-center validation.

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;John Suckling;Guy Williams;Marta Morgado Correia

  • Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination

    Antoine Lutti;Antoine Lutti;Frederic Dick;Martin I. Sereno;Martin I. Sereno;Nikolaus Weiskopf

  • Confirmation of functional zones within the human subthalamic nucleus: patterns of connectivity and sub-parcellation using diffusion weighted imaging.

    Christian Lambert;Ludvic U. Zrinzo;Zoltán Nagy;Antoine Lutti

  • Widespread age-related differences in the human brain microstructure revealed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

    Martina F. Callaghan;Patrick Freund;Patrick Freund;Patrick Freund;Bogdan Draganski;Elaine Anderson

  • Unified segmentation based correction of R1 brain maps for RF transmit field inhomogeneities (UNICORT).

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Antoine Lutti;Gunther Helms;Marianne Novak

  • Mapping the human cortical surface by combining quantitative T(1) with retinotopy.

    Martin I. Sereno;Martin I. Sereno;Antoine Lutti;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Frederic Dick

  • Detecting representations of recent and remote autobiographical memories in vmPFC and hippocampus

    Heidi M. Bonnici;Martin J. Chadwick;Antoine Lutti;Demis Hassabis

  • hMRI – A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research

    Karsten Tabelow;Evelyne Balteau;John Ashburner;Martina F. Callaghan

  • Advances in MRI-based computational neuroanatomy: From morphometry to in-vivo histology

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Siawoosh Mohammadi;Antoine Lutti;Martina F. Callaghan

  • In Vivo Functional and Myeloarchitectonic Mapping of Human Primary Auditory Areas

    Frederic Dick;Adam Taylor Tierney;Antoine Lutti;Oliver Josephs;Oliver Josephs

  • Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T

    Antoine Lutti;Chloe Hutton;Juergen Finsterbusch;Gunther Helms

  • Robust and fast whole brain mapping of the RF transmit field B1 at 7T.

    Antoine Lutti;Joerg Stadler;Oliver Josephs;Christian Windischberger

  • The habenula encodes negative motivational value associated with primary punishment in humans

    Rebecca Lawson;Benjamin Seymour;Eleanor Loh;Antoine Lutti;Antoine Lutti

  • New tissue priors for improved automated classification of subcortical brain structures on MRI.

    Sara Lorio;Samuel Fresard;Stanislaw Adaszewski;Ferath Kherif

  • A general linear relaxometry model of R1 using imaging data.

    Martina F. Callaghan;Gunther Helms;Antoine Lutti;Siawoosh Mohammadi

  • Evolution of white matter tract microstructure across the life span

    David A. Slater;Lester Melie‐Garcia;Martin Preisig;Ferath Kherif

  • Estimating the apparent transverse relaxation time (R2*) from images with different contrasts (ESTATICS) reduces motion artifacts

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Martina F. Callaghan;Oliver Josephs;Oliver Josephs;Antoine Lutti

  • Neurobiological origin of spurious brain morphological changes: A quantitative MRI study.

    Sara Lorio;Ferath Kherif;Anne Ruef;Lester Melie-Garcia

  • Investigating the functions of subregions within anterior hippocampus

    Peter Zeidman;Antoine Lutti;Eleanor A. Maguire

  • The extrastriate body area is involved in illusory limb ownership.

    Jakub Limanowski;Antoine Lutti;Felix Blankenburg

  • Brain tissue properties differentiate between motor and limbic basal ganglia circuits

    Ettore A. Accolla;Ettore A. Accolla;Juergen Dukart;Juergen Dukart;Gunther Helms;Nikolaus Weiskopf

  • High-resolution functional MRI at 3 T: 3D/2D echo-planar imaging with optimized physiological noise correction

    Antoine Lutti;David L. Thomas;Chloe Hutton;Nikolaus Weiskopf

Frequent Co-Authors

Bogdan Draganski
Bogdan Draganski University Hospital of Bern
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Nikolaus Weiskopf Max Planck Society
Ferath Kherif
Ferath Kherif University of Lausanne
John Ashburner
John Ashburner University College London
Evelyne Balteau
Evelyne Balteau University of Liège
Martin I. Sereno
Martin I. Sereno San Diego State University
Martin Preisig
Martin Preisig University of Lausanne
Richard S. J. Frackowiak
Richard S. J. Frackowiak École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Frederic Dick
Frederic Dick Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, exploring related degrees and career pathways online can be a strategic next step. Many students pursue fields in counseling, psychology, and therapy, which often intersect with neuroscience through behavioral science, mental health, and research roles.

For those aiming to support others in clinical or academic settings, cacrep accredited counseling programs ensure your credentials meet recognized standards. If affordability is a concern, you might consider the cheapest online lpc programs, which offer professional licensure pathways at a lower cost.

Family dynamics and therapeutic approaches are covered through marriage and family masters programs, which provide specialized training with strong job prospects in mental health services. Curious about graduate study costs? Learn how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology to plan your academic journey wisely.

These flexible, online programs make it possible to advance your education and career in areas closely aligned with neuroscience, all while balancing work and life obligations.

Best Scientists Citing Antoine Lutti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles