World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8068 7451 186 172 107 6868

Antoine Lutti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antoine Lutti between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antoine Lutti published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2022. 24 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2022. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 12 publications
2006 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antoine Lutti: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 1
2010 3
2011 2
2012 6
2013 13
2014 11
2015 5
2016 4
2017 2
2018 8
2019 8
2020 4
2021 8
2022 27
2023 14
2024 12
2025 12
Total 145
Download as CSV

Antoine Lutti publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine Lutti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 107
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Antoine Lutti D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine Lutti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Antoine Lutti is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research focuses on various aspects of neuroimaging, neuroscience, and medicine, with particular attention to advanced imaging techniques and brain function studies.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publications in prominent venues, with recent papers including:

  • "GnRH replacement rescues cognition in Down syndrome" (2022, Science)
  • "Converging patterns of aging-associated brain volume loss and tissue microstructure differences" (2020, Neurobiology of Aging)
  • "Mean Oxygen Saturation during Sleep Is Related to Specific Brain Atrophy Pattern" (2020, Annals of Neurology)
  • "Restoring statistical validity in group analyses of motion-corrupted MRI data" (2022, Human Brain Mapping)
  • "Temporal trajectory of brain tissue property changes induced by electroconvulsive therapy" (2021, NeuroImage)

Frequent coauthors in Antoine Lutti's publications include:

  • Bogdan Draganski
  • Ferath Kherif
  • Rita Oliveira
  • Giulia Di Domenicantonio
  • Quentin Raynaud

The scientist's work is published often in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping

Main fields of study in Antoine Lutti's research consist of:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Subfields of study cover:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

The primary topics addressed in their research include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • NMR Spectroscopy and Applications
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function

Best Publications

  • Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD(*), MT, and R2(*) at 3T: a multi-center validation.

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;John Suckling;Guy Williams;Marta Morgado Correia

  • Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination

    Antoine Lutti;Antoine Lutti;Frederic Dick;Martin I. Sereno;Martin I. Sereno;Nikolaus Weiskopf

  • Confirmation of functional zones within the human subthalamic nucleus: patterns of connectivity and sub-parcellation using diffusion weighted imaging.

    Christian Lambert;Ludvic U. Zrinzo;Zoltán Nagy;Antoine Lutti

  • Widespread age-related differences in the human brain microstructure revealed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

    Martina F. Callaghan;Patrick Freund;Patrick Freund;Patrick Freund;Bogdan Draganski;Elaine Anderson

  • Unified segmentation based correction of R1 brain maps for RF transmit field inhomogeneities (UNICORT).

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Antoine Lutti;Gunther Helms;Marianne Novak

  • Mapping the human cortical surface by combining quantitative T(1) with retinotopy.

    Martin I. Sereno;Martin I. Sereno;Antoine Lutti;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Frederic Dick

  • Detecting representations of recent and remote autobiographical memories in vmPFC and hippocampus

    Heidi M. Bonnici;Martin J. Chadwick;Antoine Lutti;Demis Hassabis

  • hMRI – A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research

    Karsten Tabelow;Evelyne Balteau;John Ashburner;Martina F. Callaghan

  • Advances in MRI-based computational neuroanatomy: From morphometry to in-vivo histology

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Nikolaus Weiskopf;Siawoosh Mohammadi;Antoine Lutti;Martina F. Callaghan

  • In Vivo Functional and Myeloarchitectonic Mapping of Human Primary Auditory Areas

    Frederic Dick;Adam Taylor Tierney;Antoine Lutti;Oliver Josephs;Oliver Josephs

  • Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T

    Antoine Lutti;Chloe Hutton;Juergen Finsterbusch;Gunther Helms

  • Robust and fast whole brain mapping of the RF transmit field B1 at 7T.

    Antoine Lutti;Joerg Stadler;Oliver Josephs;Christian Windischberger

  • The habenula encodes negative motivational value associated with primary punishment in humans

    Rebecca Lawson;Benjamin Seymour;Eleanor Loh;Antoine Lutti;Antoine Lutti

  • New tissue priors for improved automated classification of subcortical brain structures on MRI.

    Sara Lorio;Samuel Fresard;Stanislaw Adaszewski;Ferath Kherif

  • A general linear relaxometry model of R1 using imaging data.

    Martina F. Callaghan;Gunther Helms;Antoine Lutti;Siawoosh Mohammadi

  • Evolution of white matter tract microstructure across the life span

    David A. Slater;Lester Melie‐Garcia;Martin Preisig;Ferath Kherif

  • Estimating the apparent transverse relaxation time (R2*) from images with different contrasts (ESTATICS) reduces motion artifacts

    Nikolaus Weiskopf;Martina F. Callaghan;Oliver Josephs;Oliver Josephs;Antoine Lutti

  • Neurobiological origin of spurious brain morphological changes: A quantitative MRI study.

    Sara Lorio;Ferath Kherif;Anne Ruef;Lester Melie-Garcia

  • Investigating the functions of subregions within anterior hippocampus

    Peter Zeidman;Antoine Lutti;Eleanor A. Maguire

  • The extrastriate body area is involved in illusory limb ownership.

    Jakub Limanowski;Antoine Lutti;Felix Blankenburg

  • Brain tissue properties differentiate between motor and limbic basal ganglia circuits

    Ettore A. Accolla;Ettore A. Accolla;Juergen Dukart;Juergen Dukart;Gunther Helms;Nikolaus Weiskopf

  • High-resolution functional MRI at 3 T: 3D/2D echo-planar imaging with optimized physiological noise correction

    Antoine Lutti;David L. Thomas;Chloe Hutton;Nikolaus Weiskopf

Frequent Co-Authors

Bogdan Draganski
Bogdan Draganski University Hospital of Bern
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Nikolaus Weiskopf Max Planck Society
Ferath Kherif
Ferath Kherif University of Lausanne
John Ashburner
John Ashburner University College London
Evelyne Balteau
Evelyne Balteau University of Liège
Martin I. Sereno
Martin I. Sereno San Diego State University
Martin Preisig
Martin Preisig University of Lausanne
Richard S. J. Frackowiak
Richard S. J. Frackowiak École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Frederic Dick
Frederic Dick Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, exploring related degrees and career pathways online can be a strategic next step. Many students pursue fields in counseling, psychology, and therapy, which often intersect with neuroscience through behavioral science, mental health, and research roles.

For those aiming to support others in clinical or academic settings, cacrep accredited counseling programs ensure your credentials meet recognized standards. If affordability is a concern, you might consider the cheapest online lpc programs, which offer professional licensure pathways at a lower cost.

Family dynamics and therapeutic approaches are covered through marriage and family masters programs, which provide specialized training with strong job prospects in mental health services. Curious about graduate study costs? Learn how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology to plan your academic journey wisely.

These flexible, online programs make it possible to advance your education and career in areas closely aligned with neuroscience, all while balancing work and life obligations.

Best Scientists Citing Antoine Lutti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles